Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Challenging Heritage Visualisation: Beauty, Aura and Democratisation

Stuart Jeffrey
Published Online: 2015-05-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0008


In this paper I will pose a challenge to digital heritage visualisation that takes as its starting point the weirdness of the digital world in comparison to everyday experience. Related to this is the apparent inability for digital objects to benefit from or acquire aura from their originals. I contend that, unless mitigated, these properties will cause a continuing lack of engagement with digital heritage visualisation beyond the professional and academic circles in which they are created. Contrary to expectations, I will argue digital objects can indeed manifest an auratic quality and that this is in fact fundamental to how they are received by various audiences. I contend that both aura and the intimate relationship between digital representation, aesthetics and the creative imagination need to be understood and embraced in practice. Finally, I will suggest some ways of addressing the challenge by looking at modes of co-production, physical replication and aesthetic quality.

Keywords: visualisation; digital heritage; aura; aesthetics; replication


  • [1] Huggett, J., Archaeology and the new technological fetishism. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2004, 15. pp. 81-92. ISSN 1120-6861 Google Scholar

  • [2] Banks, S., Connected Communities scoping study, 2011, http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/Funding-Opportunities/Researchfunding/ Connected-Communities/Scoping-studies-and-reviews/Documents/Community-based%20Participatory%20 Research.pdf Google Scholar

  • [3] Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 Google Scholar

  • [4] Lowenthal, D., Changing Criteria of Authenticity. In K. E. Larsen (Ed.), NARA Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Paris: ICOMOS 1995, pp. 121–35. Google Scholar

  • [5] Niven, K., Jeffrey, S. and Richards, J. D., Archiving Three-Dimensional Archaeology: New Technologies, New Solutions? In E. Graeme, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska, & D. Wheatley (Eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era Volume II, e-Papers from the 40th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Southampton, 26-30 March 2012, 2012, pp.289-294 Google Scholar

  • [6] Holtorf, C., On pastness: a reconsideration of materiality in archaeological object authenticity. Anthropological Quarterly, 2013 86(2): 427-443 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Jones, S., Negotiating authentic objects and authentic selves: beyond the deconstruction of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture, 2010, 15(2): 188-97. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Pye, E., Caring for the Past: Issues in Conservation for Archaeology and Museums. London: James and James. 2001, 58-9 Google Scholar

  • [9] Benjamin, W., “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, 217-51. New York: Schocken Books, (1936), 1968 Google Scholar

  • [10] Macdonald, S., A people’s story: heritage, identity and authenticity. In C. Rojek and J. Urry (Eds.), Touring Cultures: transformations of travel and theory, London: Routledge ,1997, 155–175 (169). Google Scholar

  • [11] Latour B. & Lowe A., The migration of the aura, or how to explore the original through its facsimiles. In T. Bartscherer (Ed.), Switching Codes, 275-98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011 Google Scholar

  • [12] Gillings, M,. The real, the virtually real and the hyperreal. In S. Smiles and S. Moser (Eds.), Envisioning the Past: Archaeology and the image. NewYork: Blackwells, 2005, 223-39 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Bolter, D., MacIntyre, B., Gandy, M., & Schweitzer, P. New Media and the Permanent Crisis of Aura. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi 2006, 01354-8565 Vol 12(1): 21–39. DOI: 10.1177/1354856506061550 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Macdonald, S., Memorylands: Heritage and Identity in Europe Today, Routledge, 2013, 109-36 Google Scholar

  • [15] RCAHMS, Scotland’s Rural Past, 2011 http://www.rcahms.gov.uk/scotlands-rural-past.html accessed 14/11/2014 Google Scholar

  • [16] Scotland’s Coastal Heritage at Risk (SCH@RP),The SHARP project, 2014, http://scharp.co.uk/ accessed 14/11/2014 Google Scholar

  • [17] Jeffrey, S., Hale, A., Jones C., Jones, S., & Maxwell, M., The ACCORD project: Archaeological Community Co-Production of Research Resources . In Proc. 42st Int. Conf. on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Paris, France, 2014. 2015 Google Scholar

  • [18] Micropasts, A community platform for conducting, designing and funding research into our human past. (UCL and the British Museum). 2014 http://micropasts.org/ accessed 14/11/2014 Google Scholar

  • [19] Reilly, P. (in press). Additive Archaeology: an alternative framework for recontextualising archaeological entities, Open Archaeology, 2015, 1(1). Google Scholar

  • [20] Smithsonian Institution (Digitization Program Office/Office of the Chief Information Officer), Smithsonian X3d, 2014 http://3d.si.edu/ accessed 14/11/2014 Google Scholar

  • [21] Russell, I.A., Cochrane, A. (Eds), Collaborations, Conversations, Criticisms. One World Archaeology, Vol. 11 ISBN 978-1-4614-8990-0, Springer, New York, 2014 Google Scholar

  • [22] Watterson, A., Archaeological Visualisation Portfolio (personal website) 2014 http://www.alicewatterson.co.uk/ accessed 14/11/2014 Google Scholar

  • [23] Rua, H, Alvito, P., Living the past: 3D models, virtual reality and game engines as tools for supporting archaeology and the reconstruction of cultural heritage – the case-study of the Roman villa of Casal de Freiria. Journal of Archaeological Science Volume 38, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 3296–3308 Google Scholar

  • [24] Keys To Rome,. V-MusT - the Virtual Museum Transnational Network, 2014 http://keys2rome.eu/eng/ accessed 14/11/2014. Google Scholar

  • [25] Gillings, M. and Goodrick, G.T. ‘Sensuous and Reflexive GIS: exploring visualisation and VRML’, Internet Archaeology, Issue 1, 1996 http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue1/gillings_index.html, accessed 12/11/14. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-12-04

Accepted: 2015-04-17

Published Online: 2015-05-18

Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0008.

Export Citation

© 2015 Stuart Jeffrey. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Fabrizio Galeazzi
Current Anthropology, 2018, Volume 59, Number 3, Page 268
Siân Jones, Stuart Jeffrey, Mhairi Maxwell, Alex Hale, and Cara Jones
International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2017, Page 1
Elizabeth Tait, Richard Laing, Andy Grinnall, Simon Burnett, and John Isaacs
Journal of Information Science, 2016, Volume 42, Number 3, Page 420
Kevin Garstki
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2017, Volume 24, Number 3, Page 726

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in