Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year

Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Social Web and Archaeology’s Restructuring: Impact, Exploitation, Disciplinary Change

Sara Perry / Nicole Beale
Published Online: 2015-05-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0009


From blogs to crowdfunding, YouTube to LinkedIn, online photo-sharing sites to open-source community-based software projects, the social web has been a meaningful player in the development of archaeological practice for two decades now. Yet despite its myriad applications, it is still often appreciated as little more than a tool for communication, rather than a paradigm-shifting system that also shapes the questions we ask in our research, the nature and spread of our data, and the state of skill and expertise in the profession. We see this failure to critically engage with its dimensions as one of the most profound challenges confronting archaeology today. The social web is bound up in relations of power, control, freedom, labour and exploitation, with consequences that portend real instability for the cultural sector and for social welfare overall. Only a handful of archaeologists, however, are seriously debating these matters, which suggests the discipline is setting itself up to be swept away by our unreflective investment in the cognitive capitalist enterprise that marks much current web-based work. Here we review the state of play of the archaeological social web, and reflect on various conscientious activities aimed both at challenging practitioners’ current online interactions, and at otherwise situating the discipline as a more informed innovator with the social web’s possibilities.

Keywords: social web; archaeology; digital; heritage; social media; skill; labour; heteromation; neoliberalism; cognitive capitalism


  • [1] Reilly, P., Rahtz S., Archaeology and the Information Age: A Global Perspective, Routledge, London, 1992 Google Scholar

  • [2] Miller, P., Richards, J., The good, the bad, and the downright misleading: Archaeological adoption of computer visualisation. In Huggett, J., Ryan, N. (Eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1994, British Archaeological Reports International Series 600, 1995, 19-22 Google Scholar

  • [3] Henson, D., Digital media and public engagement in archaeology: an opinion piece, Archäologische Informationen, 2013, 36, 13-20 Google Scholar

  • [4] Smith, L., The Uses of Heritage. Routledge, Abingdon, 2006. Google Scholar

  • [5] Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T., Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, Altamira, Lanham, 2008 Google Scholar

  • [6] Conkey, M. Dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, Archaeologies, 2005, 1(1), 9-59 Google Scholar

  • [7] Moshenska, G., Schadla-Hall, T. Mortimer Wheeler’s theatre of the past, Public Archaeology, 2011, 10 (1), 46–55 Google Scholar

  • [8] Shanks, M., Tilley, C. Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Routledge, London, 1992 Google Scholar

  • [9] Tarlow, S., Nilsson-Stutz, L. Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual?, Archaeological Dialogues, 2013, 20 (1), 1-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Bintliff, J., Gaffney, C.F. (Eds.) Archaeology at the Interface: Studies in Archaeology’s Relationships with History, Geography, Biology, and Physical Science, British Archaeological Reports, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, 1986, 300(i–iv) Google Scholar

  • [11] Kintigh, K., Altschul, J., Beaudry, M., Drennan, R., Kinzig, A., Kohler, T., Grand challenges for archaeology, American Antiquity, 2014, 79 (1), 5-24 Google Scholar

  • [12] Berners-Lee, T., Fischetti, M., Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor, Harper, San Francisco, 1999 Google Scholar

  • [13] Gruber, T., Collective knowledge systems: Where the social web meets the semantic web, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2008, 6 (1), 4-13 Google Scholar

  • [14] Walker, D., Antisocial media in archaeology? Archaeological Dialogues, 2014, 21 (2), 217-235 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Moscati, P., Towards a history of archaeological computing: An introduction, 2014, http://caa2014.sciencesconf. org/46082/document Google Scholar

  • [16] Scollar, I., 25 years of computer applications in archaeology. In Dingwall, L., Exon, S., Gaffney, V., Laflin, S., van Leusen, M. (Eds.), Archaeology in the Age of the Internet: CAA 97, Archaeopress, Oxford, 1997, 5-10 Google Scholar

  • [17] Zubrow, E., Digital archaeology: A historical context. In Evans, T., Daly, P. (Eds.), Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory, Abingdon, Routledge, 2006, 10-31 Google Scholar

  • [18] Graham, S., Watrall, E., A digital archaeology of digital archaeology: work in progress, November 6, 2014, http://electricarchaeology. ca/2014/11/06/a-digital-archaeology-of-digital-archaeology-work-in-progress/ Google Scholar

  • [19] Kansa, E., Kansa, S., Watrall, E. (Eds.) Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2011, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1r6137tb Google Scholar

  • [20] Jeffrey, S., A new digital dark age? Collaborative web tools, social media and long-term preservation, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 553-570 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Sayer, F., Politics and the development of community archaeology in the UK, The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 2014, 5 (1), 55-73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000041/ CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Phillips, L.B., The temple and the bazaar: Wikipedia as a platform for open authority in museums, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013, 56 (2), 219-235 Google Scholar

  • [23] Spiliopoulou, A., Mahony, S., Routsis, V., Kamposiori, C., Cultural institutions in the digital age: British Museum’s use of Facebook Insights, Participations, 2014, 11 (1), 286-303 Google Scholar

  • [24] Richardson, L., Twitter and archaeology: an archaeological network in 140 characters or less. In Bonacchi, C. (Ed.), Archaeologists and the Digital: Towards Strategies of Engagement, Archetype, London, 2012, 15-24 Google Scholar

  • [25] Terras, M., The digital wunderkammer: Flickr as a platform for amateur cultural and heritage content, Library Trends, 2011, 59 (4), 686-706 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Huvila, I., Engagement has its consequences: The emergence of the representations of archaeology in social media, Archäologische Informationen, 2013, 36, 21-30 Google Scholar

  • [27] Harris, T., Interfacing archaeology and the world of citizen sensors: Exploring the impact of neogeography and volunteered geographic information on an authenticated archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 580-591 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Richardson, L., The Day of Archaeology: Blogging and online archaeological communities, European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies, 2014, 4, 421-446 Google Scholar

  • [29] Rocks-Macqueen, D., Webster, C. (Eds.) Blogging Archaeology, 2014, www.digtech-llc.com/s/2014-Blogging- Archaeology-eBook-35vc.pdf Google Scholar

  • [30] Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Pett, D., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Developing crowd- and community-fuelled archaeological research. Early research from the MicroPasts project. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology: CAA14, Paris, April 22-25, 2015 Google Scholar

  • [31] Steinbach, L., Digital cultural heritage is getting crowded: Crowdsourced, crowd-funded, and crowd-Engaged. In Din, H., Wu, S. (Eds.), Digital Heritage and Culture: Strategy and Implementation, London, World Scientific, 2014, 261-294 Google Scholar

  • [32] Jameson Jr., J. H., Toward multivocality in public archaeology: Public empowerment through collaboration. In Scott-Ireton, D. (Ed.), Between the Devil and the Deep: Meeting Challenges in the Public Interpretation of Maritime Cultural Heritage, Springer, New York, 2013, 3-10 Google Scholar

  • [33] Alcock, S., Dufton, A., Durusu-Tanriover, M., Archaeology for the people: First foray into the world of MOOCs, Anthropology News, 2013, 54 (11-12), 24 Google Scholar

  • [34] Earl, G., First thoughts from the Portus MOOC, Hestia2 Seminar: Digital pedagogy: How are new technologies transforming the interface between research and learning?, 2014, 6 June, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ LBArmT3XAY Google Scholar

  • [35] Ducke, B., Natives of a connected world: free and open source software in archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 571-579, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2012.743259 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Bonacchi, C. (Ed.) Archaeology and the Digital: Towards Strategies of Engagement, Archetype, London, 2012 Google Scholar

  • [37] Giaccardi, E. (Ed.) Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture, Routledge, London, 2012 Google Scholar

  • [38] Kansa, E., New directions for the digital past. In Kansa, E., Kansa, S., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2011, 1-25, http://escholarship. org/uc/item/1r6137tb Google Scholar

  • [39] Law, M., Morgan, C., The archaeology of digital abandonment: Online sustainability and archaeological sites, Present Pasts, 2014, 6 (1), 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pp.58 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Beale, N., Local Authority Museums and the Web: New Directions for Curatorial Practice, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, forthcoming, Unpublished PhD thesis Google Scholar

  • [41] Richardson, L., Public Archaeology in a Digital Age, University College London, London, UK, 2014, Unpublished PhD thesis http://figshare.com/authors/Lorna_Richardson/606491 Google Scholar

  • [42] Walker, D., Towards a Decentered Museum: Authority, Museums, and the Web, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, forthcoming, Unpublished PhD thesis Google Scholar

  • [43] Colley, S., Archaeological Communication and Digital Technology Use, in prep. Google Scholar

  • [44] Colley, S., Social media and archaeological communication. An Australian survey, Archäologische Informationen, 2014, 36, 65-80 Google Scholar

  • [45] Perry, S., Shipley, L., Osborne, J., Digital media, power and (in)equality in archaeology and heritage, Internet Archaeology, 2015, 38, http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.38.4 Google Scholar

  • [46] Richardson, L., Online survey data from Twitter and archaeology surveys 2011-2013, Journal of Open Archaeology Data, 2014, 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joad.ae Google Scholar

  • [47] Perry, S., Changing the way archaeologists work: Blogging and the development of expertise, Internet Archaeology, in press Google Scholar

  • [48] Sylaiou, S., Basiouka, S., Patias, P., Stylianidis, S., The volunteered geographic information in archaeology, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2013, II-5/W1, 301-306 Google Scholar

  • [49] Pietrobruno, S., Between narratives and lists: Performing digital intangible heritage through global media, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2014, 20 (7-8), 742-759, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.807398 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50] Austin, M., Archaeological blogging and engagement. In Rocks-Macqueen, D., Webster, C. (Eds.), Blogging Archaeology, 2014, 9-19, www.digtech-llc.com/s/2014-Blogging-Archaeology-eBook-35vc.pdf Google Scholar

  • [51] Williams, S., Terras, M., Warwick, C., What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers, Journal of Documentation, 2013, 69 (3), 384-410 Google Scholar

  • [52] Clack, T., Brittain, M. (Eds.), Archaeology and the Media, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 2007 Google Scholar

  • [53] Perry, S., The Archaeological Eye: Visualisation and the Institutionalisation of Academic Archaeology in London, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2011, Unpublished PhD thesis Google Scholar

  • [54] Walker, D., Decentering the discipline? Archaeology, museums and social media. Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 2014, 1, 77-102 Google Scholar

  • [55] Richardson, L., A digital public archaeology?, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2013, 23, 10, http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/pia.431 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [56] Limp, W.F., Web 2.0 and beyond, or on the web nobody knows you’re an archaeologist. In Kansa, E., Kansa, S., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2011, 265-280, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1r6137tb Google Scholar

  • [57] Hill, L., From field to media fodder: A cautionary tale from the trenches, Cultural Geographies in Practice, 2012, 20 (2), 249-255 Google Scholar

  • [58] Lake, M., Open archaeology, World Archaeology, 44 (4), 471-478 Google Scholar

  • [59] Law, J., Seeing Like a Survey, 2008, http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2008SeeingLikeASurvey.pdf Google Scholar

  • [60] Morgan, C., (ed.) Special Issue: Blogging, Internet Archaeology, forthcoming Google Scholar

  • [61] Colley, S., Ethics and digital heritage. In Ireland, T., Schofield, J. (Eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage, Springer, New York, 2015, 13-32 Google Scholar

  • [62] Oomen, J., Aroyo, L., Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges. In C&T ‘11 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, New York, ACM, 2011, 138-149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2103354.2103373/ CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [63] Ridge, M., From tagging to theorizing: Deepening engagement with cultural heritage through crowdsourcing, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013, 56 (4), 435-450 Google Scholar

  • [64] O’Neil, M., The sociology of critique in Wikipedia, Journal of Peer Production, 2011, 0, http://peerproduction.net/issues/ issue-0/ Google Scholar

  • [65] Moon, C., The Collective Power of Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: Research on Wiki Inventory-Making Focusing on South Korea’s ‘ICHPEDIA’ and Scotland’s ‘ICH Wiki List’, University of York, York, UK, 2014, Unpublished MSc Dissertation Google Scholar

  • [66] Restivo, M., van de Rijt, A., No praise without effort: Experimental evidence on how rewards affect Wikipedia’s contributor community, Information, Communication & Society, 2014, 17 (4), 451-462 Google Scholar

  • [67] Flamenbaum, R., Buyandelger, M., Downey, G., Starn, O., Laserna, C., Kelkar, S., Rouse, C., Looser, T., Anthropology in and of MOOCs, American Anthropologist, 2014, 116 (4), 1-10 Google Scholar

  • [68] Meisenhelder, S., MOOC mania, Thought and Action, 2013, Fall, 7-26 Google Scholar

  • [69] Jones, J., Introduction: MOOCs as media world, American Anthropologist, 2014, 116 (4), 1-2 Google Scholar

  • [70] Smith, M., Citizen science in archaeology, American Antiquity, 2014, 79 (4), 749-762 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [71] Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Pett, D., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Sparks, R., Wexler, J., Crowd-sourced archaeological research: The MicroPasts project, Archaeology International, 2014, 17, 61-68 Google Scholar

  • [72] Chandler, D., Kapelner, A., Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2013, 90, 123-133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.003/ CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [73] Owens, T., Making crowdsourcing compatible with the missions and values of cultural heritage organisations. In Ridge M. (Ed.), Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage, Ashgate, Oxford, 2014, 269-280 Google Scholar

  • [74] Fuchs, C., Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time, Time and Society, 2014, 23 (1), 97-123 Google Scholar

  • [75] Fuchs, C., Social Media: A Critical Introduction, 2014, Sage, London Google Scholar

  • [76] Fuchs, C., Sevignani, S., What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? triple, 2013, 11 (2), 237-298 Google Scholar

  • [77] Taylor B., Amateurs, professionals and the knowledge of archaeology, British Journal of Sociology, 1995, 46 (3), 499-508 Google Scholar

  • [78] Faulkner, N., Archaeology from below, Public Archaeology, 2000, 1 (1), 21-33, http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/pua.2000.1.1.21/ CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [79] Jones, S., Dialogues between past, present and future: Reflections on engaging the recent past. In Daglish, C. (Ed.) Archaeology, the Public and the Recent Past, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, 163-176 Google Scholar

  • [80] Sayre, M., Student-initiated projects, the flipped classroom, and crowdfunding, The SAA Archaeological Record, 2014, 14 (1), 14-17 Google Scholar

  • [81] Holtorf, C., Archaeology is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture, Archaeopress, Oxford, 2007 Google Scholar

  • [82] Simpson, F., Williams, H., Evaluating community archaeology in the UK, Public Archaeology, 2008, 7 (2), 69-90, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1179/175355308X329955 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [83] Beale, N., Beale, G., Community-driven approaches to open source archaeological imaging. In Edwards, B., Wilson, A. (Eds.), Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, in press, De Gruyter Open Google Scholar

  • [84] Noordegraaf, J., Barholomew, A., Eveleigh, A., Modeling crowdsourcing for cultural heritage. In Proctor, N., Cherry, R. (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2014: Selected Papers from an International Conference, Silver Spring, Museums and the Web, 2014, http://mw2014.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/modeling-crowdsourcing-for-cultural-heritage/ Google Scholar

  • [85] Holmes, K., Slater, A., Patterns of Voluntary Participation in Membership Associations: A Study of UK Heritage Supporter Groups, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2011, 41 (5), 850-869, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764011420881 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [86] Johnson, E., Why archaeologists must stop working for free: A response inspired by the #FreeArchaeology debate, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2014, 24 (1), 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pia.473 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [87] Hamilton, S., Under-representation in contemporary archaeology, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2014, 24 (1), 24, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pia.469 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [88] Hardy, S., Obstacles to career progression in archaeology: Precarious labour and unemployment, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2014, 24 (1), 21, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pia.474 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [89] Crary, J., 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep, Verso, London, 2013 Google Scholar

  • [90] Parikka, J., What is Media Archaeology? Polity Press, Cambridge, 2012 Google Scholar

  • [91] Ekbia H., Nardi, B., Inverse instrumentality: how technologies objectify patients and players. In Leonardi, P., Nardi, B., Kallinikos, J. (Eds.), Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, 157-176 Google Scholar

  • [92] Owens, T., Digital heritage and the crowd, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013, 56 (1), 121-130 Google Scholar

  • [93] Cefkin, M., Anya, O., Moore, R., A perfect storm? Reimagining work in the era of the end of the job, Ethnographic Praxis, 2014, 1, 3–19, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.01002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [94] Standing, G., The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, Bloomsbury, London, 2011 Google Scholar

  • [95] Standing G., Why the precariat is not a “bogus concept”, Open Democracy, March 4, 2014, https://www.opendemocracy. net/guy-standing/why-precariat-is-not-“bogus-concept” Google Scholar

  • [96] Moshenska, G., Reflections on the 1943 ‘Conference on the Future of Archaeology’, Archaeology International, Present Pasts, 2013, 16, 128-139, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ai.1606 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [97] Piscitelli M., Using social networks to fundraise: Crowdfunding for the archaeologist, The SAA Archaeological Record, 2013, 13 (4), 36-39, http://www.saa.org/Portals/0/SAA/Publications/thesaaarchrec/September2013.pdf Google Scholar

  • [98] Knowles, K., Britain must dig deeper to save its archaeology, The Independent, November 15, 2014, http://www. independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/britain-must-dig-deeper-to-save-its-archaeology-9602435.html Google Scholar

  • [99] Jackson, S., Lennox, R., Neal, C., Roskams, S., Hearle, J., Brown, S., Engaging Communities in the Big Society: What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology, The Historic Environment, 2014, 5 (1) Google Scholar

  • [100] Ekbia H., Nardi, B., Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines, First Monday, 2014, 19 (6), http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/5331/4090 Google Scholar

  • [101] Haklay, M., Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation, Environment and Planning, 2013, 45, 55-69 Google Scholar

  • [102] Parikka, J., The Anthrobscene, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2014 Google Scholar

  • [103] Morgan, C., Eve, S., DIY and digital archaeology: what are you doing to participate? World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 521-37 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [104] Insole, P., Piccini, A., Your place or mine? Crowdsourced planning, moving image archives and community archaeology, Archaologische Informationen, 2013, 36, 31-43Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-12-12

Accepted: 2015-04-14

Published Online: 2015-05-19

Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0009.

Export Citation

© 2015 Sara Perry, Nicole Beale. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Lorna-Jane Richardson, Matt Law, J.Andrew Dufton, Kate Ellenberger, Stuart Eve, Tom Goskar, Jess Ogden, Daniel Pett, and Andrew Reinhard
Internet Archaeology, 2018, Number 47
Diane E. Bailey, Eduardo H. Diniz, Bonnie A. Nardi, Paul M. Leonardi, and Dan Sholler
Information and Organization, 2018
Chiara Bonacchi and Bodil Petersson
Internet Archaeology, 2017
Ludvig Papmehl-Dufay and Ulrika Söderström
Internet Archaeology, 2017, Number 46
Lorna-Jane Richardson and James Dixon
Internet Archaeology, 2017, Number 46
L. Harald Fredheim
International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2017, Page 1
Lorna-Jane Richardson and Simon Lindgren
Open Archaeology, 2017, Volume 3, Number 1
Lorna-Jane Richardson
World Archaeology, 2017, Page 1
Howard Williams and Alison Atkin
Internet Archaeology, 2015, Number 40
Colleen Morgan and Judith Winters
Internet Archaeology, 2015, Number 39

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in