Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Open Archaeology

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Further Frontiers in GIS: Extending Spatial Analysis to Textual Sources in Archaeology

Patricia Murrieta-Flores
  • History & Archaeology Department, University of Chester
/ Ian Gregory
  • History Department, University of Lancaster
Published Online: 2015-05-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0010

Abstract

Although the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has a long history in archaeology, spatial technologies have been rarely used to analyse the content of textual collections. A newly developed approach termed Geographic Text Analysis (GTA) is now allowing the semi-automated exploration of large corpora incorporating a combination of Natural Language Processing techniques, Corpus Linguistics, and GIS. In this article we explain the development of GTA, propose possible uses of this methodology in the field of archaeology, and give a summary of the challenges that emerge from this type of analysis.

Keywords: GIS; Digital Humanities; Spatial Humanities; Geographic Text Analysis; NLP; Corpus Linguistics; corpora; digital archaeology

References

  • [1] L. Isaksen, ‘The application of network analysis to ancient transport geography: A case study of Roman Baetica’, Digital Medievalist, vol. 4, 2008.

  • [2] J. Baker and S. Brookes, ‘Outside the gate: sub-urban legal practices in early medieval England’, World Archaeology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 747–761, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/00438243.2013.865330. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [3] S. Jeffrey, J. Richards, F. Ciravegna, S. Waller, S. Chapman, and Z. Zhang, ‘The Archaeotools project: faceted classification and natural language processing in an archaeological context’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1897, pp. 2507–2519, Jun. 2009. [Web of Science]

  • [4] E. Barker, S. Bouzarovski, C. Pelling, L. Isaksen, ‘Mapping an ancient historian in a digital age: the Herodotus Encoded Space-Text-Image Archive (HESTIA)’, Leeds International Classical Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, 2010.

  • [5] E. Barker, K. Byrne, L. Isanksen, E. Kansa, N. Rabinowitz, Google Ancient Places. (2012). at http://googleancientplaces. wordpress.com/2012/02/25/ the-story-continues/

  • [6] C. Grover, R. Tobin, K. Byrne, M. Woollard, J. Reid, S. Dunn, and J. Ball, ‘Use of the Edinburgh geoparser for georeferencing digitized historical collections’, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, vol. 368, no. 1925, pp. 3875–3889, Aug. 2010.

  • [7] T. Harris, J. Corrigan, and D. Bodenhamer, ‘Challenges for the Spatial Humanities: Toward a Research Agenda’, in The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010, pp. 167–176.

  • [8] F. Moretti, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, 2005.

  • [9] D. Cooper and I. Gregory, ‘Mapping the English Lake District: A literary GIS’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 89–108, 2011. [Web of Science]

  • [10] I. N. Gregory and A. Hardie, ‘Visual GISting: bringing together corpus linguistics and Geographical Information Systems’, Lit Linguist Computing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 297–314, Jan. 2011.

  • [11] P. Murrieta-Flores, A. Baron, I. Gregory, A. Hardie, and P. Rayson, ‘Automatically Analyzing Large Texts in a GIS Environment: The Registrar General’s Reports and Cholera in the 19th Century’, Transactions in GIS, 2015, doi: 10.1111/ tgis.12106. [Crossref]

  • [12] S. Adolphs, Introducing electronic text analysis. New York: Routledge, 2006.

  • [13] T. McEnery and A. Hardie, Corpus linguistics: method, theory and practice. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

  • [14] M. Kulldorff, ‘A spatial scan statistic’, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1481–1496, Jan. 1997.

  • [15] M. D. Eddy, ‘The prehistoric mind as a historical artefact’, Notes Rec. R. Soc., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2011. [Web of Science]

  • [16] T. Hitchcock, ‘Confronting the Digital: Or How Academic History Writing Lost the Plot’, Cultural and Social History, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–23, Mar. 2013.

  • [17] S. Tanner, T. Munoz, and P. Hemy Ros, ‘Measuring Mass Text Digitization Quality and Usefulness : Lessons Learned from Assessing the OCR Accuracy of the British Library’s 19th Century Online Newspaper Archive’, Dlib Magazine, vol. 15, no. 78, 2009.

  • [18] R. Tobin, C. Grover, K. Byrne, J. Reid & J. Walsh, Evaluation of georeferencing. in 1 (ACM Press, 2010). doi:10.1145/1722080.1722089 [Crossref]

  • [19] C. J. Rupp, P. Rayson, I. Gregory, A. Hardie, A. Joulain, and D. Hartmann, ‘Dealing with heterogeneous big data when geoparsing historical corpora’, 2014, pp. 80–83.

About the article

Received: 2014-12-19

Accepted: 2015-03-31

Published Online: 2015-05-20



Citation Information: Open Archaeology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0010. Export Citation

© 2015 Patricia Murrieta-Flores, Ian Gregory. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in