Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Further Frontiers in GIS: Extending Spatial Analysis to Textual Sources in Archaeology

Patricia Murrieta-Flores / Ian Gregory
Published Online: 2015-05-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0010


Although the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has a long history in archaeology, spatial technologies have been rarely used to analyse the content of textual collections. A newly developed approach termed Geographic Text Analysis (GTA) is now allowing the semi-automated exploration of large corpora incorporating a combination of Natural Language Processing techniques, Corpus Linguistics, and GIS. In this article we explain the development of GTA, propose possible uses of this methodology in the field of archaeology, and give a summary of the challenges that emerge from this type of analysis.

Keywords: GIS; Digital Humanities; Spatial Humanities; Geographic Text Analysis; NLP; Corpus Linguistics; corpora; digital archaeology


  • [1] L. Isaksen, ‘The application of network analysis to ancient transport geography: A case study of Roman Baetica’, Digital Medievalist, vol. 4, 2008. Google Scholar

  • [2] J. Baker and S. Brookes, ‘Outside the gate: sub-urban legal practices in early medieval England’, World Archaeology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 747–761, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/00438243.2013.865330. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] S. Jeffrey, J. Richards, F. Ciravegna, S. Waller, S. Chapman, and Z. Zhang, ‘The Archaeotools project: faceted classification and natural language processing in an archaeological context’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1897, pp. 2507–2519, Jun. 2009. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [4] E. Barker, S. Bouzarovski, C. Pelling, L. Isaksen, ‘Mapping an ancient historian in a digital age: the Herodotus Encoded Space-Text-Image Archive (HESTIA)’, Leeds International Classical Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, 2010. Google Scholar

  • [5] E. Barker, K. Byrne, L. Isanksen, E. Kansa, N. Rabinowitz, Google Ancient Places. (2012). at http://googleancientplaces. wordpress.com/2012/02/25/ the-story-continues/ Google Scholar

  • [6] C. Grover, R. Tobin, K. Byrne, M. Woollard, J. Reid, S. Dunn, and J. Ball, ‘Use of the Edinburgh geoparser for georeferencing digitized historical collections’, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, vol. 368, no. 1925, pp. 3875–3889, Aug. 2010. Google Scholar

  • [7] T. Harris, J. Corrigan, and D. Bodenhamer, ‘Challenges for the Spatial Humanities: Toward a Research Agenda’, in The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010, pp. 167–176. Google Scholar

  • [8] F. Moretti, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [9] D. Cooper and I. Gregory, ‘Mapping the English Lake District: A literary GIS’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 89–108, 2011. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10] I. N. Gregory and A. Hardie, ‘Visual GISting: bringing together corpus linguistics and Geographical Information Systems’, Lit Linguist Computing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 297–314, Jan. 2011. Google Scholar

  • [11] P. Murrieta-Flores, A. Baron, I. Gregory, A. Hardie, and P. Rayson, ‘Automatically Analyzing Large Texts in a GIS Environment: The Registrar General’s Reports and Cholera in the 19th Century’, Transactions in GIS, 2015, doi: 10.1111/ tgis.12106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] S. Adolphs, Introducing electronic text analysis. New York: Routledge, 2006. Google Scholar

  • [13] T. McEnery and A. Hardie, Corpus linguistics: method, theory and practice. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Google Scholar

  • [14] M. Kulldorff, ‘A spatial scan statistic’, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1481–1496, Jan. 1997. Google Scholar

  • [15] M. D. Eddy, ‘The prehistoric mind as a historical artefact’, Notes Rec. R. Soc., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2011. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [16] T. Hitchcock, ‘Confronting the Digital: Or How Academic History Writing Lost the Plot’, Cultural and Social History, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–23, Mar. 2013. Google Scholar

  • [17] S. Tanner, T. Munoz, and P. Hemy Ros, ‘Measuring Mass Text Digitization Quality and Usefulness : Lessons Learned from Assessing the OCR Accuracy of the British Library’s 19th Century Online Newspaper Archive’, Dlib Magazine, vol. 15, no. 78, 2009. Google Scholar

  • [18] R. Tobin, C. Grover, K. Byrne, J. Reid & J. Walsh, Evaluation of georeferencing. in 1 (ACM Press, 2010). doi:10.1145/1722080.1722089 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] C. J. Rupp, P. Rayson, I. Gregory, A. Hardie, A. Joulain, and D. Hartmann, ‘Dealing with heterogeneous big data when geoparsing historical corpora’, 2014, pp. 80–83.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-12-19

Accepted: 2015-03-31

Published Online: 2015-05-20

Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0010.

Export Citation

© 2015 Patricia Murrieta-Flores, Ian Gregory. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Miguel Won, Patricia Murrieta-Flores, and Bruno Martins
Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 2018, Volume 5

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in