Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year

Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Curating Archaeological Knowledge in the Digital Continuum: from Practice to Infrastructure

Costis Dallas
  • Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, 140 St George St., Toronto, ON M5S 2G6, Canada
  • Department of Communication, Media and Culture, Panteion University, Syngrou 136, Athens 176 71, Greece
  • Digital Curation Unit, IMIS–Athena Research Centre, Artemidos 6 & Epidavrou, Maroussi 151 25, Greece
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-06-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0011


As a “grand challenge” for digital archaeology, I propose the adoption of programmatic research to meet the challenges of archaeological curation in the digital continuum, contingent on curation-enabled global digital infrastructures, and on contested regimes of archaeological knowledge production and meaning making. My motivation stems from an interest in the sociotechnical practices of archaeology, viewed as purposeful activities centred on material traces of past human presence. This is exemplified in contemporary practices of interpretation “at the trowel’s edge”, in epistemological reflexivity and in pluralization of archaeological knowledge. Adopting a practice-centred approach, I examine how the archaeological record is constructed and curated through archaeological activity “from the field to the screen” in a variety of archaeological situations. I call attention to Çatalhöyük as a salient case study illustrating the ubiquity of digital curation practices in experimental, well-resourced and purposefully theorized archaeological fieldwork, and I propose a conceptualization of digital curation as a pervasive, epistemic-pragmatic activity extending across the lifecycle of archaeological work. To address these challenges, I introduce a medium-term research agenda that speaks both to epistemic questions of theory in archaeology and information science, and to pragmatic concerns of digital curation, its methods, and application in archaeology. The agenda I propose calls for multidisciplinary, multi-team, multiyear research of a programmatic nature, aiming to re-examine archaeological ontology, to conduct focused research on pervasive archaeological research practices and methods, and to design and develop curation functionalities coupled with existing pervasive digital infrastructures used by archaeologists. It has a potential value in helping to establish an epistemologically coherent framework for the interdisciplinary field of archaeological curation, in aligning archaeological ontologies work with practice-based, agencyoriented and participatory theorizations of material culture, and in matching the specification and design of archaeological digital infrastructures with the increasingly globalized, ubiquitous and pervasive digital information environment and the multiple contexts of contemporary meaning-making in archaeology.

Keywords: archaeological curation; digital continuum; social studies of practice; digital infrastructures; ontologies


  • [1] Trigger, B.G., Archaeology at the crossroads: What’s new? Annual Review of Anthropology, 1984, 13, 275–300 Google Scholar

  • [2] Huggett, J., Disciplinary issues: challenging the research and practice of computer applications in archaeology, in: Earl, G., Sly, T., Chrysanthi, A., Murrieta-Flores, P., et al. (Eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26-29 March 2012, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2013, 13–24 Google Scholar

  • [3] Llobera, M., Archaeological visualization: Towards an archaeological information science (AISc), Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2011, 18, 193–223 Google Scholar

  • [4] Moser, S., Glazier, D., Phillips, J.E., el Nemr, L.N., et al., Transforming archaeology through practice: Strategies for collaborative archaeology and the Community Archaeology Project at Quseir, Egypt, World Archaeology, 2002, 34, 220–248 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] McDavid, C., Archaeologies that hurt; descendants that matter: a pragmatic approach to collaboration in the public interpretation of African-American archaeology, World Archaeology, 2002, 34, 303–314 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Richardson, L., A digital public archaeology? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2013, 23, 1–12 Google Scholar

  • [7] Beale, N., How community archaeology can make use of open data to achieve further its objectives, World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 612–633 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Arnold, D., Geser, G., EPOCH Research Agenda for the Applications of ICT to Cultural Heritage. Full Report, Archaeolingua, Budapest: 2008, http://public-repository.epoch-net.org/publications/RES_AGENDA/research_agenda.pdf Google Scholar

  • [9] Zhou, M., Romanowska, I., Wu, Z., Xu, P., et al. (Eds.), Revive the past: Proceedings of the XXXIX Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 2012 Google Scholar

  • [10] Kenderdine, S., Forte, M., Camporesi, C., Rhizome of Western Han: an omnispatial theatre for archaeology, in: Zhou, M., Romanowska, I., Wu, Z., Xu, P., et al. (Eds.), Revive the Past: Proceedings of the XXXIX Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 2012, 141–158 Google Scholar

  • [11] Cobb, C.R., The once and future archaeology, American Antiquity, 2014, 79, 589–595 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Clarke, D.L., Analytical archaeology, New York: Columbia University Press, 1978 Google Scholar

  • [13] Kintigh, K., Altschul, J., Beaudry, M., Drennan, R., et al., Grand challenges for archaeology, American Antiquity, 2014, 79, 5–24 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Ribes, D., Lee, C.P., Sociotechnical studies of cyberinfrastructure and e-research: Current themes and future trajectories, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2010, 19, 231–244 Google Scholar

  • [15] Bowker, G.C., Baker, K.S., Millerand, F., Ribes, D., Towards information infrastructure studies: ways of knowing in a networked environment, in: Hunsinger, J. (Ed.), International Handbook of Internet Research, 2010, 97–117 Google Scholar

  • [16] Ferguson, L.M., Murray, D.M., Archaeological documentary archives: preparation, curation and storage, Institute of Field Archaeologists, 1997 Google Scholar

  • [17] Sullivan, L.P., Childs, S.T., Curating archaeological collections: from the field to the repository, Walnut Creek Calif.: Rowman Altamira, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [18] Johnson, E., An archaeological curation dilemma with an approach to a solution - the Texas-based accreditation program for curatorial facilities, Plains Anthropologist, 2003, 48, 151-164 Google Scholar

  • [19] Limp, W.F., Curation of data, in: Maschner, H.D.G., Chippindale, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Archaeological Methods, Rowman Altamira, 2005, 1270–1294 Google Scholar

  • [20] Drewett, P., Field archaeology: an introduction, 2 edition, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge, 2011 Google Scholar

  • [21] Childs, S.T., The curation crisis, Federal Archaeology, 1995, 7, 11–15 Google Scholar

  • [22] Bustard, W., Archeological curation in the 21st century: or, making sure the roof doesn’t blow off, Cultural Resource Management, 2000, 23, 10–15 Google Scholar

  • [23] Bawaya, M., Archaeology: curation in crisis, Science, 2007, 317, 1025–1026 Google Scholar

  • [24] Peebles, C.S., Notes from underground: archaeological data management from excavation to curation, Curator: The Museum Journal, 1981, 24, 225–251 Google Scholar

  • [25] Richards, J.D., Digital preservation and access, European Journal of Archaeology, 2002, 5, 343–366 Google Scholar

  • [26] Richards, J.D., Managing digital preservation and access: the Archaeology Data Service, in: McManamon, F.P., Stout, A., Barnes, J.A. (Eds.), Managing Archaeological Resources: Global Context, National Programs, Local Actions, Walnut Creek Calif.: Left Coast Press, 2008, 173–194 Google Scholar

  • [27] Kintigh, K.W., Altschul, J.H., Sustaining the digital archaeological record, Heritage Management, 2010, 3, 264–274 Google Scholar

  • [28] McManamon, F.P., Kintigh, K.W., Brin, A., Digital Antiquity and the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR): broadening access and ensuring long-term preservation for digital archaeological data, CSA Newsletter, 2010, 23, http://csanet.org/newsletter/fall10/nlf1002.html Google Scholar

  • [29] Kintigh, K., The promise and challenge of archaeological data integration, American Antiquity, 2006, 71, 567–578 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Kintigh, K., Altschul, J., Forum sustaining the digital archaeological record, Heritage & Society, 2010, 3, 264–274 Google Scholar

  • [31] Kintigh, K.W., Altschul, J.H., Kinzig, A.P., Limp, W.F., et al., Cultural dynamics, deep time, and data planning cyberinfrastructure investments for archaeology, Advances in Archaeological Practice, 2015, 3, 1–15 Google Scholar

  • [32] Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B.A., Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design, Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press, 2007 Google Scholar

  • [33] Dallas, C., An agency-oriented approach to digital curation theory and practice, in: Trant, J., Bearman, D. (Eds.), The International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting Proceedings, Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, 2007, http://www.archimuse.com/ichim07/papers/dallas/dallas.html Google Scholar

  • [34] Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory, London: Routledge, 2001 Google Scholar

  • [35] Palmer, C.L., Cragin, M.H., Scholarship and disciplinary practices, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2008, 42, 163–212 Google Scholar

  • [36] Huizing, A., Cavanagh, M., Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science, Information Research, 2011, 16 (4), http://www.informationr.net/ir/16-4/paper497.html Google Scholar

  • [37] Barker, P., Techniques of archaeological excavation, London: Routledge, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [38] Lock, G., Using computers in archaeology: towards virtual pasts, London: Routledge, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [39] Patrik, L.E., Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 1985, 27–62 Google Scholar

  • [40] Edgeworth, M., Acts of discovery: An ethnography of archaeological practice, British Archaeological Reports, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [41] Searle, J.R., The construction of social reality. 1995, London: Allen Lane, 1995 Google Scholar

  • [42] Searle, J.R., Social ontology: some basic principles, Anthropological Theory, 2006, 6, 12–29 Google Scholar

  • [43] Latour, B., From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or how to make things public, in: Making Things Public - Atmospheres of Democracy: An Exhibition at ZKM Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe: ZKM, 2005, 4–31 Google Scholar

  • [44] Voss, B.L., Curation as research. A case study in orphaned and underreported archaeological collections, Archaeological Dialogues, 2012, 19, 145–169 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] Trigger, B.G., A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989 Google Scholar

  • [46] Schnapp, A., The discovery of the past: the origins of archaeology, London: British Museum, 1996 Google Scholar

  • [47] Dallas, C., Smith, P., Lock, G.R., Cornforth, J., et al., Digital multimedia and Classical culture: the Sacred Way perspective, in: Roberts, D.A. (Ed.), European Museum Documentation: Strategies and Standards, Cambridge: Museum Documentation Association, 1993, 117–130 Google Scholar

  • [48] Bianchi Bandinelli, R., Franchi dell’ Orto, L., Introduzione all’archeologia, Rome; Bari: Universale Laterza, 1976 Google Scholar

  • [49] Pearce, S.M. (Ed.), Interpreting objects and collections, London; New York: Routledge, 1994 Google Scholar

  • [50] Fuchs, B., Isaksen, L., Smith, A., The virtual lightbox for museums and archives: a portlet solution for structured data reuse across distributed visual resources, in: Trant, J., Bearman, D. (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2005: Proceedings, Toronto: Archives and Museum Informatics, 2005 Google Scholar

  • [51] Trant, J., Curating collections knowledge: museums on the cyberinfrastructure, in: Marty, P.F, Jones, B.K. (Eds.), Museum Informatics: People, Information, and Technology in Museums, New York & London: Routledge, 2007, 275–292 Google Scholar

  • [52] Goodwin, C., Things and their embodied environments, in: Malafouris, L., Renfrew, C. (Eds.), The cognitive life of things. Cambridge, McDonald Institute Monographs, 2010, 103–120 Google Scholar

  • [53] Witmore, C.L., On multiple fields. Between the material world and media: two cases from the Peloponnesus, Greece, Archaeological Dialogues, 2004, 11, 133–164 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [54] Malafouris, L., The cognitive basis of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate, in: DeMarrais, E., Gosden, C., Renfrew, C. (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world, Cambridge, McDonald Institute Monographs, 2004, 53–61 Google Scholar

  • [55] Gardin, J.-C., Archaeological constructs: an aspect of theoretical archaeology, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980 Google Scholar

  • [56] Gardin, J.-C., Roux, V., The Arkeotek project: a European network of knowledge bases in the archaeology of techniques, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2004, 15, 25–40 Google Scholar

  • [57] Dallas, C., Jean-Claude Gardin on archaeological data, representation and knowledge: implications for digital archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2015 Google Scholar

  • [58] Heyworth, M., Ross, S., Richards, J., Internet Archaeology: an electronic journal for archaeology, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 1996, 28, 517–523 Google Scholar

  • [59] Richards, J.D., Archaeology, e-publication and the Semantic Web, Antiquity, 2006, 80, 970–979 Google Scholar

  • [60] Dallas, C., A step beyond reading in archaeological publication, Archives and Museum Informatics, 1997, 11, 55–64 Google Scholar

  • [61] Richards, J.D., Disseminating the data: archaeological publication in the electronic age, in: Ross, S. (Ed.), Pre-Circulated Papers, Problems and Potentials of Electronic Information in Archaeology Seminar, London: British Library, 1994 Google Scholar

  • [62] Gardin, J.-C., The consequences, good or bad, of taking knowledge bases seriously, in: Ross, S. (Ed.), Pre-Circulated Papers, Problems and Potentials of Electronic Information in Archaeology Seminar, London: British Library, 1994 Google Scholar

  • [63] Roux, V., Faciliter la consultation de textes scientifiques. Nouvelles pratiques éditoriales..., Hermès, 2004, 151–159 Google Scholar

  • [64] Parsons, M.A., Fox, P.A., Is data publication the right metaphor? Data Science Journal, 2013, 12, WDS32–WDS46 Google Scholar

  • [65] Kopytoff, I., The cultural biography of things, in: Appadurai, A. (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, 64–91 Google Scholar

  • [66] Gosden, C., Marshall, Y., The cultural biography of objects, World Archaeology, 1999, 31, 169–178 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [67] Harley, D., Acord, S.K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., et al., Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines, Berkeley, Calif.: CSHE, University of California, Berkeley, 2010 Google Scholar

  • [68] Childs, S.T., Archaeological collections: valuing and managing an emerging frontier, in: Agnew, N., Bridgland, J. (Eds.), Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation. Proceedings of the Conservation Theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, DC, 22–26 June 2003, Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2006, 204–210 Google Scholar

  • [69] Trigger, B.G., Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man, 1984, 355–370 Google Scholar

  • [70] Kohl, P.L., Nationalism and archaeology: on the constructions of nations and the reconstructions of the remote past, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1998, 223–246 Google Scholar

  • [71] Meskell, L., Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, London: Routledge, 1998 Google Scholar

  • [72] Ferris, N., Between colonial and indigenous archaeologies: legal and extra-legal ownership of the archaeological past in North America, Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie, 2003, 27, 154–190 Google Scholar

  • [73] Habu, J., Fawcett, C., Matsunaga, J.M. (Eds.), Evaluating multiple narratives: beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies, Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2008 Google Scholar

  • [74] Hamilakis, Y., Decolonizing Greek archaeology: indigenous archaeologies, modernist archaeology and the post-colonial critique, in: Damaskos, D., Plantzos, D. (Eds.), A singular antiquity: Archaeology and Hellenic identity in twentieth-century Greece, Athens: Benaki Museum, 2008, 1–15 Google Scholar

  • [75] Hodder, I. (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge University Press New York, NY, 1982 Google Scholar

  • [76] Hodder, I., Interpretive archaeology and its role, American Antiquity, 1991, 56, 7–18 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [77] Shanks, M., Tilley, C.Y., Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice, London; New York: Routledge, 1992 Google Scholar

  • [78] Trigger, B.G., Archaeology and the image of the American Indian, American Antiquity, 1980, 662–676 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [79] Ucko, P.J., Australian academic archaeology: aboriginal transformation of its aims and practices, Australian Archaeology, 1983, 11–26 Google Scholar

  • [80] Watkins, J., Through wary eyes: Indigenous perspectives on archaeology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2005, 34, 429–449 Google Scholar

  • [81] Ascherson, N., Editorial, Public Archaeology, 2000, 1, 1–4 Google Scholar

  • [82] Marshall, Y., What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 2002, 34, 211–219 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [83] Merriman, N., Public archaeology, London; New York: Routledge, 2004 Google Scholar

  • [84] Faulkner, N., Archaeology from below, Public Archaeology, 2000, 1, 21–33 Google Scholar

  • [85] Lake, M., Open archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 471–478 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [86] Morgan, C., Eve, S., DIY and digital archaeology: what are you doing to participate? World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 521–537 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [87] Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: new approaches to communication and collaboration, Los Angeles, Calif.: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2011 Google Scholar

  • [88] Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W., Arbuckle, B., Publishing and pushing: mixing models for communicating research data in archaeology, International Journal of Digital Curation, 2014, 9, 57–70 Google Scholar

  • [89] Jeffrey, S., A new digital Dark Age? Collaborative web tools, social media and long-term preservation, World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 553–570 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [90] Elliott, T., Gillies, S., Digital geography and classics, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2009, 3(1), http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/1/000031/000031.html Google Scholar

  • [91] Limp, W.F., Web 2.0 and beyond, or on the Web nobody knows you’re an archaeologist, in: Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New approaches to communication and collaboration, Los Angeles, Calif.: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2011, 265–280 Google Scholar

  • [92] Isaksen, L., Martinez, K., Gibbins, N., Earl, G., et al., Interoperate with whom? Formality, archaeology and the semantic web, in: Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, April 26-27th, 2010, Raleigh, NC: 2010 Google Scholar

  • [93] Earl, G., Sly, T., Chrysanthi, A., Murrieta-Flores, P., et al. (Eds.), Archaeology in the digital era: papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26-29 March 2012, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2014 Google Scholar

  • [94] Giligny, F., Djindjan, F., Costa, L., Moscati, P., et al. (Eds.), CAA 2014 - 21st century archaeology: Concepts, methods and tools. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Oxford: Archaeopress, 2015 Google Scholar

  • [95] Mellaart, J., Çatal Hüyük: a neolithic town in Anatolia, London: Thames and Hudson, 1967 Google Scholar

  • [96] Rountree, K., Archaeologists and goddess feminists at Çatalhöyük: an experiment in multivocality, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 2007, 23, 7–26 Google Scholar

  • [97] Hodder, I., “Always momentary, fluid and flexible”: towards a reflexive excavation methodology, Antiquity, 1997, 71, 691–700 Google Scholar

  • [98] Berggren, Å., Dell’Unto, N., Forte, M., Haddow, S., et al., Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge, Antiquity, 2015, 89, 433–448 Google Scholar

  • [99] Wolle, A.-C., Tringham, R., Multiple Çatalhöyüks on the World Wide Web, Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük by Members of the Çatalhöyük Teams, 2000, 207–218 Google Scholar

  • [100] Morgan, C.L., (Re)building Çatalhöyük: changing virtual reality in archaeology, Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 2009, 5, 468–487 Google Scholar

  • [101] Tringham, R., Ashley, M., Creating and archiving the media database and documentation of the excavation, in: Tringham, R., Stevanovic, M. (Eds.), Last House on the Hill: BACH Area Reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey, Los Angeles, CA: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2012, 31–46 Google Scholar

  • [102] Earl, G., Chrysanthi, A., Pagi, H., Personal and reflexive video recording in archaeological research, in: Tung, B. (Ed.), Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report, Çatalhöyük Research Project, 2013, 280–288 Google Scholar

  • [103] Forte, M., Dell’Unto, N., Lercari, N., 3D digging projects - season 2013, in: Tung, B. (Ed.), Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report, Çatalhöyük Research Project, 2013, 212–219 Google Scholar

  • [104] Mickel, A., Diaries, 2013, in: Tung, B. (Ed.), Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report, Çatalhöyük Research Project, 2013, 275–279 Google Scholar

  • [105] Perry, S., Chrysanthi, A., Frankland, T., Site visualisation and presentation 2013, in: Tung, B. (Ed.), Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report, Çatalhöyük Research Project, 2013, 289–310 Google Scholar

  • [106] Taylor, J., Issavi, J., On-site tablet recording, in: Tung, B. (Ed.), Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report, Çatalhöyük Research Project, 2013, 256–259 Google Scholar

  • [107] Grossner, K., Hodder, I., Meeks, E., Engel, C., et al., A living archive for Çatalhöyük, in: Computer Applications in Archaeology (CAA) 2012, Paris: CAA, 2012, http://catalhoyuk.stanford.edu/assets/CAA2014_A%20Living%20Archive%20for%20Catalhoyuk_Apr2014.pdf Google Scholar

  • [108] Thorpe, R., Often fun, usually messy: fieldwork, recording and higher orders of things, in: Cobb, H., Harris, O.J.T., Jones, C., Richardson, P. (Eds.), Reconsidering archaeological fieldwork: Exploring on-site relationships between theory and practice, New York: Springer, 2012, 31–52 Google Scholar

  • [109] Harris, E.C., The stratigraphic sequence: A question of time, World Archaeology, 1975, 7, 109–121 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [110] Berggren, Å., Reflexive methodology, in: Tung, B. (Ed.), Çatalhöyük 2013 archive report, Çatalhöyük Research Project, 2013, 272–274 Google Scholar

  • [111] Barzun, J., Graff, H.F., The modern researcher, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1992 Google Scholar

  • [112] Tringham, R., Households through a digital lens, in: Parker, B.J., Foster, C.P. (Eds.), New perspectives in household archaeology, Winona Lake, IL: Eisenbrauns, 2012, 81–122 Google Scholar

  • [113] Hodder, I., Archaeological reflexivity and the “local” voice, Anthropological Quarterly, 2003, 76, 55–69 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [114] Video documentation, Çatal News: Newsletter of the Çatalhöyük Research Trust, 1996, 2, http://www.catalhoyuk.com/newsletters/02/index.html Google Scholar

  • [115] Forte, M., Dell’Unto, N., Haddow, S., Cyberarchaeology: how 3D modelling is unpeeling the Neolithic at Çatalhöyük, Current World Archaeology, 2013, 37–40 Google Scholar

  • [116] Reilly, P., Towards a virtual archaeology, in: Lockyear, K., Rahtz, S.P.Q. (Eds.), Computer Applications in Archaeology Conference, CAA1990, British Archaeological Reports (International Series 565), 1990, 133–139 Google Scholar

  • [117] Meskell, L., Nakamura, C., King, R., Farid, S., Figured lifeworlds and depositional practices at Çatalhöyük, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 2008, 18, 139–161 Google Scholar

  • [118] Tringham, R., Stevanovic, M., Different excavation styles create different windows into Çatalhöyük, in: Hodder, I. (Ed.), Towards reflexive method in archaeology: The example at Çatalhöyük by members of the Çatalhöyük teams, Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2000, 111–118 Google Scholar

  • [119] Huvila, I., The information condition: information use by archaeologists in labour, work and action, Information Research, 2008, 13, 13–4 Google Scholar

  • [120] Tringham, R., Stevanovic, M., Tringham, R. (Eds.), The public face of archaeology at Çatalhöyük, in: Last House on the Hill: BACH area reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey, Los Angeles, CA: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2012, 503–530 Google Scholar

  • [121] Boast, R., Biehl, P.F., Archaeological knowledge production and dissemination in the digital age, in: Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New approaches to communication and collaboration, Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2011, 119–155 Google Scholar

  • [122] Dallas, C., Archaeological knowledge, virtual exhibitions and the social construction of meaning, in: Moscati, P. (Ed.), Virtual museums and archaeology: The contribution of the Italian National Research Council, Roma: Insegna del Giglio, 2007, 31–64 Google Scholar

  • [123] Mills, S., Tringham, R., CatVidPlace project: Collaboration on the senses of place, Archaeoblog: all things archaeological, 2006, http://traumwerk.stanford.edu/archaeolog/2006/05/catvidplace_project_collaborat.html Google Scholar

  • [124] Forte, M., 3D archaeology: new perspectives and challenges—the example of Çatalhöyük, Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, 2014, 2, 1–29 Google Scholar

  • [125] Emele, M., Virtual spaces, atomic pig-bones and miscellaneous goddesses, in: Hodder, I. (Ed.), Towards reflexive methods in archaeology: The example at Çatalhöyük, Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research, 2000, 219–228 Google Scholar

  • [126] Day, J. (Ed.), Making senses of the past: toward a sensory archaeology, Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 2013 Google Scholar

  • [127] Hamilakis, Y., Archaeology and the senses: human experience, memory, and affect, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2013 Google Scholar

  • [128] Farid, S., Proportional representation: multiple voices in archaeological interpretation at Çatalhöyük, in: Chapman, R., Wylie, A. (Eds.), Material evidence: Learning from archaeological practice, Routledge, 2014, 59-77 Google Scholar

  • [129] Edgeworth, M., Multiple origins, development, and potential of ethnographies of archaeology, in: Edgeworth, M. (Ed.), Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations, Lanham, Md.: Altamira Press, 2006, 1–19 Google Scholar

  • [130] Wylie, A., Archaeological cables and tacking: the implications of practice for Bernstein’s “Options beyond objectivism and relativism,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1989, 18, 1–19 Google Scholar

  • [131] McKemmish, S., Placing records continuum theory and practice, Archival Science, 2001, 1, 333–359 Google Scholar

  • [132] Pratt, M.L., Arts of the contact zone, Profession, 1991, 33–40 Google Scholar

  • [133] Clifford, J., Museums as contact zones, in: Routes : Travel and translation in the late twentieth century, Cambridge, Mass. ; London: Harvard University Press, 1997, 188–219 Google Scholar

  • [134] DCC, What is digital curation? Digital Curation Centre, 2014, http://www.dcc.ac.uk/digital-curation/what-digital-curation Google Scholar

  • [135] Lee, C.A., Tibbo, H.R., Digital curation and trusted repositories: steps toward success, Journal of Digital Information, 2007, 8 (2), https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/229/183 Google Scholar

  • [136] Yakel, E., Digital curation, OCLC Systems & Services, 2007, 23, 335–340 Google Scholar

  • [137] Gow, A., Molloy, L., Konstantelos, L., The DigCurV curriculum framework: structure, context and approach, in: : Cirinnà, C., Fernie, K., Lunghi, M., Casarosa, V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Framing the Digital Curation Curriculum Conference, Florence: DigCurV: Digital Curator Vocational Education Europe, 2013, http://digcur-education.org/ltu/content/download/11769/180781/version/3/file/paper11.pdf Google Scholar

  • [138] Moles, N., Ross, S., Report on the context of the DigCurV Curriculum Framework, in: Cirinnà, C., Fernie, K., Lunghi, M., Casarosa, V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Framing the Digital Curation Curriculum Conference, Florence: DigCurV: Digital Curator Vocational Education Europe, 2013, http://digcur-education.org/index.php/ger/content/download/11944/183353/file/paper07.pdf Google Scholar

  • [139] Cirinnà, C., Fernie, K., Lunghi, M., Round table “Creating a common vision for digital curation education: building alliances,” in: Cirinnà, C., Fernie, K., Lunghi, M., Casarosa, V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Framing the Digital Curation Curriculum Conference, Florence: DigCurV: Digital Curator Vocational Education Europe, 2013, http://digcur-education.org/ger/content/download/11915/182913/file/paper28.pdf Google Scholar

  • [140] Lyon, L., Rusbridge, C., Neilson, C., Whyte, A., Disciplinary approaches to sharing, curation, reuse and preservation, DCC SCARP final report, Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre, 2010, http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/scarp/SCARP-FinalReport-Final-SENT.pdf Google Scholar

  • [141] Lee, C.A. (Ed.), I, digital: personal collections in the digital era, Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2011 Google Scholar

  • [142] Constantopoulos, P., Dallas, C., Aspects of a digital curation agenda for cultural heritage, in: Marík, V., Bradshaw, J.M., Meyer, J., Gruver, W.A., et al. (Eds.), DHMS 2008: IEEE SMC International Conference on Distributed Human-Machine Systems, Prague: IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society; Czech Technical University in Prague, 2008, 317–323 Google Scholar

  • [143] Benardou, A., Constantopoulos, P., Dallas, C., Gavrilis, D., A conceptual model for scholarly research activity, in: Unsworth, J., Rosenbaum, H., Fisher, K.E. (Eds.), iConference 2010: the fifth annual iConference, Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, 2010, 26–32 Google Scholar

  • [144] Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., et al. (Eds.), Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (version 5.0.4), ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, 2011, http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.4.pdf Google Scholar

  • [145] Boyer, E.L., Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990 Google Scholar

  • [146] Peirce, C.S., How to make our ideas clear, Popular Science Monthly, 1878, 12, 286–302 Google Scholar

  • [147] Preucel, R.W., Bauer, A.A., Archaeological pragmatics, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 2001, 34, 85–96 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [148] Bhaskar, R., The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of contemporary human sciences, 2nd ed, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989 Google Scholar

  • [149] Gibbon, G.E., Explanation in archaeology, Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1989 Google Scholar

  • [150] Dallas, C., Thingformation: informing thing cultures, curating digital heritage. 2011 lecture series, Toronto: Digital Curation Institute, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, 2011, http://itube.ischool.utoronto.ca/Panopto/Pages/Viewer/Default.aspx?id=7479ae50-fd8e-417a-a5e0-fca4cd7f27ef Google Scholar

  • [151] McCarthy, G., Finding a future for digital cultural heritage information resources using contextual information frameworks, in: Kenderdine, S., Cameron, F. (Eds.),Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007, 245–260 Google Scholar

  • [152] Higgins, S., The DCC curation lifecycle model, International Journal of Digital Curation, 2008, 3, 134–140 Google Scholar

  • [153] Benardou, A., Constantopoulos, P., Dallas, C., Gavrilis, D., Understanding the information requirements of arts and humanities scholarship: implications for digital curation, International Journal of Digital Curation, 2010, 5, 18–33 Google Scholar

  • [154] Benardou, A., Constantopoulos, P., Dallas, C., An approach to analyzing working practices of research communities in the humanities, International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2013, 7, 105–127 Google Scholar

  • [155] Hughes, L., Constantopoulos, P., Dallas, C., Digital methods in the humanities: understanding and describing their use across the disciplines, in: Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., Unsworth, J.M. (Eds.), A new companion to digital humanities, 2nd edition, Wiley-Blackwell, in print Google Scholar

  • [156] Hamilakis, Y., Anagnostopoulos, A., What is archaeological ethnography?, Public Archaeology, 2009, 8, 65–87 Google Scholar

  • [157] Dallas, C., Syntax and semantics of figurative art: a formal approach, in: Reilly, P., Rahtz, S.P.Q. (Eds.), Archaeology and the information age: A global perspective, London: Routledge, 1992, 230–275 Google Scholar

  • [158] Dallas, C., A new agenda for museum information systems, in: Ross, S. (Ed.), London: British Library, 1994, 251–264 Google Scholar

  • [159] Crofts, N., Gill, T., Stead, S., Stiff, M., et al. (Eds.), Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (version 4.2.1), ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, 2005 Google Scholar

  • [160] Doerr, M., Cripps, P., Hermon, S., Hiebel, G., et al., CRMarchaeo: modelling context, stratigraphic unit, excavated matter, in: Proceedings: 29th CRM-SIG Meeting, Heraklion, Greece: 2013, 21–25 Google Scholar

  • [161] Strubulis, C., Flouris, G., Tzitzikas, Y., Doerr, M., A case study on propagating and updating provenance information using the CIDOC CRM, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2014, 15, 27–51 Google Scholar

  • [162] Gonzalez-Perez, C., Martín-Rodilla, P., Parcero-Oubiña, C., Fábrega-Álvarez, P., et al., Extending an abstract reference model for transdisciplinary work in cultural heritage, in: Dodero, J.M., Palomo-Duarte, M., Karampiperis, P. (Eds.), Metadata and semantics research, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, 190–201 Google Scholar

  • [163] Srinivasan, R., Huang, J., Fluid ontologies for digital museums, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2005, 5, 193–204 Google Scholar

  • [164] Boast, R., Bravo, M., Srinivasan, R., Return to Babel: emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge, The Information Society, 2007, 23, 395–403 Google Scholar

  • [165] Gardin, J.-C., Artificial intelligence and the future of semiotics: An archaeological perspective, Semiotica, 1989, 77, 5–26 Google Scholar

  • [166] Grize, J.-B., Les discours du savoir: Pour un dialogue avec Jean-Claude Gardin, Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, 2000, 38, 131–137 Google Scholar

  • [167] Cook, T., Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts, Archival Science, 2001, 1, 3–24 Google Scholar

  • [168] Kreps, C.F., Liberating culture: cross-cultural perspectives on museums, curation, and heritage preservation, Routledge, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [169] Sider, T., Four-dimensionalism: an ontology of persistence and time, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003 Google Scholar

  • [170] Lowenthal, D., Material preservation and its alternatives, Perspecta, 1989, 25, 66–77 Google Scholar

  • [171] Davidovic, A., Die Wirkung archäologischer Ausgrabungsmethoden auf die Herstellung archäologischen Wissens, in: Freikamp, U., Leanza, M., Mende, J., Müller, S., et al. (Eds.), Kritik Mit Methode? Forschungsmethoden Und Gesellschaftskritik, Berlin: Karl Dietz Verlag, 2008 Google Scholar

  • [172] Huggett, J., Lost in information? Ways of knowing and modes of representation in e-archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 538–552 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [173] Garfinkel, H., Good “ organizational reasons for “bad” clinic records, in: Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1967, 186–207 Google Scholar

  • [174] Doerr, M., Bekiari, C., Kritsotaki, A., Hiebel, G., et al., Modelling scientific activities: proposal for a global schema for integrating metadata about scientific observation, in: Access and understanding – networking in the digital era: The 6th annual conference of CIDOC, the International Committee for Documentation of ICOM, Dresden, Germany: 2014, http://www.cidoc2014.de/images/sampledata/cidoc/papers/E-2_Bekiari_paper.pdf Google Scholar

  • [175] Conkey, M.W., Gero, J.M., Programme to practice: Gender and feminism in archaeology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1997, 411–437 Google Scholar

  • [176] Slaughter, R.A., Futures studies as an intellectual and applied discipline, American Behavioral Scientist, 1998, 42, 372–385 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [177] Inayatullah, S., Reductionism or layered complexity? The futures of futures studies, Futures, 2002, 34, 295–302 Google Scholar

  • [178] Nelson, R., Extending foresight: The case for and nature of Foresight 2.0, Futures, 2010, 42, 282–294 Google Scholar

  • [179] Dallas, C., Information systems and cultural knowledge: the Benaki Museum case, Computers and the History of Art Journal, 1992, 3, 7–15 Google Scholar

  • [180] Doerr, M., The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata, AI Magazine, 2003, 24, 75–92 Google Scholar

  • [181] Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., Koubarakis, M., Telos: Representing knowledge about information systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 1990, 8, 325–362 Google Scholar

  • [182] Constantopoulos, P., Doerr, M., The Semantic Index System: A brief presentation, TR Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, 1994 Google Scholar

  • [183] Dionissiadou, I., Doerr, M., Mapping of material culture to a semantic network, in: Automating museums in the Americas and beyond, Sourcebook, ICOM-MCN Joint Annual Meeting, August 28–September 3, 1994, Silver Spring, MD: Museum Computer Network, 1994, http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/publications/paperlink/Map_of_mater_cultur_to_a_sem_net.ps.gz Google Scholar

  • [184] Gavrilis, D., Dallas, C., Angelis, S., A curation-oriented thematic aggregator, in: Aalberg, T., Papatheodorou, C., Dobreva, M., Tsakonas, G., et al. (Eds.), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Valetta, Malta: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, 132–137 Google Scholar

  • [185] Gavrilis, D., Angelis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Dallas, C., et al., Preservation aspects of a curation-oriented thematic aggregator, in: Borbinha, J., Nelson, M., Knight, S. (Eds.), iPres 2013: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects, Lisbon, Portugal: Técnico Lisboa & inesc id lisboa, 2013, 246–251 Google Scholar

  • [186] Gavrilis, D., Michail, H., Ioannides, M., Papatheodorou, C., et al., Cultural heritage object metadata enrichment in an integrated aggregation environment, in: Euromed 2014: International Conference on Cultural Heritage, Limassol, Cyprus: 2014 Google Scholar

  • [187] Bowker, G.C., Science on the run: information management and industrial geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920-1940, Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 1994 Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-12-14

Accepted: 2015-05-09

Published Online: 2015-06-29

Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0011.

Export Citation

© 2015 Costis Dallas. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Isto Huvila, Michael Olsson, Ixchel M. Faniel, Marija Dalbello, and Costis Dallas
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, Volume 54, Number 1, Page 570
Costis Dallas
Archival Science, 2016, Volume 16, Number 4, Page 421

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in