Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Rational Grounds for Dialogue Between Archaeologists and Metal Detectorists in Spain

Ignacio Rodríguez Temiño
Published Online: 2016-10-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0011


The sudden emergence of metal-detector users and subsequent swelling of their numbers rocked the field of professional archaeology due to the impact that the use of metal detectors has on the conservation of archaeological heritage. The situation has led to confrontation, polarisation and mistrust on both sides. These problems are particularly severe in countries such as Spain, where the law does not allow the unauthorised use of these devices. However, merely enforcing the law is not enough to resolve such conflicts, just as encouraging ‘treasure hunting’ is no solution either. This paper uses sociological models to explain the lack of communication and distance between the two groups with a view to finding principles that can be used to establish rational grounds for communication. Here ‘rational grounds’ is understood to mean foundations that will enable the convergence of the different interests whilst at the same time respecting the social function of archaeological heritage. To this end, a model is suggested based on a new wave of scientific communication aimed at including detectorists in archaeological research projects.

Keywords: Detectorists; Archaeologists; Metal Detectors; Archaeological Heritage; Archaeological Research


  • Addyman, P. V. (2009). Before the Portable Antiquities Scheme. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal Detecting & Archaeology. (pp. 51-62). Newcastle: Newcastle University.Google Scholar

  • Almansa Sánchez, J. (Ed.) (2013). Arqueología Pública en España. Madrid: JAS Arqueología SLU.Google Scholar

  • Alonso Ibáñez, M. R. (1992). El patrimonio histórico. Destino Público y valor cultural. Madrid: Civitas.Google Scholar

  • Bland, R. (2004). The Treasure Act and the Portable Antiquities scheme: a case study in developing public archaeology. In N. Merriman (Ed.), Public archaeology (pp. 272-291). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bobbio, N. (1985). El poder y el derecho. In N. Bobbio & M. Bovero. Origen y fundamento del poder político (pp. 19-36). Mexico D. F.: Grijalbo.Google Scholar

  • Cleere, H. (1993). Managing the archaeological heritage, Antiquity, 67, 400-402.Google Scholar

  • Cortés Ruiz, A. (2002). Actuaciones policiales contra expolios arqueológicos. In La protección del patrimonio arqueológico contra el expolio. (pp. 61-78). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar

  • Deckers, P. (2013). The past, present and future of amateur archaeological metal detecting in Flanders. In Forum: The looting of archaeological heritage (Part I - Beyond metal detectors: around the plundering of archaeological heritage). AP Journal, 3, 13-17.Google Scholar

  • Dobat, A. S. (2013). Between Rescue and Research: An Evaluation after 30 Years of Liberal Metal Detecting in Archaeological Research and Heritage Practice in Denmark, European Journal of Archaeology, 16(4), 704–725.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dromgoole, S. (2004). Murky waters for government policy: the case of a 17th century British warship and 10 tonnes of gold coins. Marine Policy, 28, (3), 189–198 (doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2003.08.006).Google Scholar

  • Ferguson, N. (2013). Biting the bullet: the role of hobbyist metal detecting within battlefield archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 33 (http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.33.3).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2010). The Portable Antiquities Scheme and the Treasure Act: Protecting the Archeology of England and Wales?. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 20, 1-11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gómez López, A. B. (2014). Fondo documental asociado al Farmm. In Fondo Arqueológico Ricardo Marsal Monzón. (pp. 67-84). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar

  • Graham, D. (2004). To change the law: the story behind the Treasure Act 1996. Surrey Archaeological Collections, 91, 307-314. Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Cátedra: Madrid.Google Scholar

  • Hanworth, R. (1995). Treasure Trove: new approaches to antiquities legislation. In K. W. Tubb (Ed.), Antiquities, Trade or Betrayed: Legal, Ethical and Conservation Issues (pp. 173-175). London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar

  • Henson, D. (2011). Does archaeology matter? In G. Moshenska and S. Dhanjal (Eds.), Community Archaeology: Theory, methods and practices (pp. 120-127). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

  • Karl, R (2011). On the Highway to Hell: Thoughts on Unintended Consequences for Portable Antiquities of § 11(1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 2 (2), 111-133.Google Scholar

  • Lambrick, G. (2002). Council for British Archaeology slams government treasure hunt, press release issued 8 October 2002, http://www.britarch.ac.uk/conserve/sussexpr.html (accessed 18 September 2007).Google Scholar

  • Lewenstein, B. V. (2003). Models of Public Communication of Science & Technology, http://www.somedicyt.org.mx/assets/ hemerobiblioteca/articulos/Lewenstein_Models_of_communication.pdf (visited 12th December 2012).Google Scholar

  • Lyotard, J.‑F. (1979). La Condition Postmoderne: Rapport Sur Le Savoir. Paris: Editions de Minuits.Google Scholar

  • Merriman, N. (1989). The social basis of museum and heritage visiting. In S. M. Pearce (Ed.), Museum Studies in Material Culture (pp. 172-179). Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

  • Merriman, N. (2004). Introduction. Diversity and dissonance in public archaeology. In N. Merriman (Ed.), Public Archaeology (pp. 1-17). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Morales Bravo de Laguna, J. (2015). La Guardia Civil y la lucha contra el expolio arqueológico. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25, 26-44.Google Scholar

  • Muñoz Reyes, A. M., Rodrigo Cámara, J. M. & Fernández Cacho, S. (2004). Los datos a examen: estadística e índice de perdurabilidad de los sitios arqueológicos andaluces, PH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico, 49, 72-79.Google Scholar

  • Oxford Archaeological Unit (2009). Nighthawks and Nighthawling: Damage to Archaeological Sites in the United Kingdom and Crown Dependencies Caused by the Illegal Search for and Removal of Antiquities. Final Report. Oxford: Oxford Archaeological Unit.Google Scholar

  • Querol Fernández, M. A. (2010). Manual de gestión del Patrimonio Cultural. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar

  • Querol Fernández, M. Á., Martínez Navarrete, M. I., Hernández Hernández, F., Cerdeño Serrano, L. & Antona Val, V. (1995). The value of archaeological heritage: an analysis by the Professional Association of Spanish Archaeologists (APAE). Journal of European Archaeology, 3 (1), 233-247.Google Scholar

  • Rahtz, P. (1974). Volunteers. In P. Rahtz (Ed.), Rescue Archaeology. (pp. 274-279). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Relaño, A. Tesoros para jornaleros sin tajo [Treasures for jobless day-labourers]. El País 11th September 1983, 22.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Temiño, I. (2004). Arqueología urbana en España. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Temiño, I. (2012). Indianas jones sin futuro. La lucha contra el expolio del patrimonio arqueológico. Madrid: JAS Arqueología SLU.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Temiño, I., & Matas Adamuz, F. J. (2013). Arqueólogos contra «piteros», «piteros» contra arqueólogos. In J. Almansa Sánchez (Ed.), Arqueología Pública en España. (pp. 187-218). Madrid: JAS Arqueología Editorial.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Temiño, I & Roma Valdés, A. (2015). Fighting against the archaeological looting and the illicit trade of antiquities in Spain. International Journal of Cultural Property, 22 (1), 111-130.Google Scholar

  • Ruíz Rodríguez, A. (2015). La Protohistoria en el Farmm. In Fondo Arqueológico Ricardo Marsal Monzón. (pp. 119-130). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar

  • Spencer, P. D. (2009). The Construction of Histories: Numismatics and Metal Detecting. In S. Thomas & P. G. Stone (Eds.), Metal Detecting & Archaeology. (pp. 125-136). Newcastle: Newcastle University.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, S., Wessman, A., Siltainsuu, J. & Perttola, W. (2015). Understanding metal detecting and archaeology in Finland. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25, 187-199.Google Scholar

  • Trilla Bernet, J. (2003). La educación fuera de la escuela. Ámbitos no formales y educación social. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar

  • Ulst, I. (2013). Combating Illicit Metal Detecting in Estonia. In Forum: The looting of archaeological heritage (Part I - Beyond metal detectors: around the plundering of archaeological heritage). AP Journal, 3, 21-28.Google Scholar

  • Waterton, E. & Smith, L. (2010). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16, (1-2), 4-15.Google Scholar

  • Willems, W. J. H. (2007). The work of making Malta: the Council of Europe’s archaeology and planning committee 1988-1996. European Journal of Archaeology, 10, (1), 57-71.Google Scholar

  • Yáñez Vega, A. (2015). Actividades ilícitas contra el patrimonio arqueológico: sistemas punitivos penal y administrative. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25, 13-30. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-02-27

Accepted: 2016-08-19

Published Online: 2016-10-14

Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0011.

Export Citation

© 2016 Ignacio Rodríguez Temiño. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in