Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Online Tribes and Digital Authority: What Can Social Theory Bring to Digital Archaeology?

Lorna-Jane Richardson / Simon Lindgren
Published Online: 2017-08-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0008

Abstract

From early discussions of the disruptive potential of computer technologies for archaeological applications, to the present era of digital archaeology as the technical underpinning of modern archaeological practice, we have continued to debate the potential impacts of digital communication and digital capture and storage on our knowledge, profession and communications. The increased use of digital tools and methods for archaeological research and dissemination, as well as what Roosevelt (2015) has referred to as the shift to the digital paradigm within archaeological practice, leads us to suggest that the impact of this paradigm shift requires careful and critical examination. This article will examine the edges of the disciplines of archaeology and sociology, where we aim to advance our understanding of the relationship between digital technologies and archaeological knowledge from a uniquely social perspective, using the theoretical approaches of both classic and modern sociologists. The application of this lens of sociology to digital archaeology equips us to understand how archaeology and archaeological practice is situated in a social world, which is especially relevant in the Global West, where digital technology is ubiquitous. Through a critical consideration of the complexity of use of digital technologies within digital archaeology, we can begin to shift our focus away from the character and method of tools and workflow, to the background of intellectual power and influence.

Keywords: sociology; digital archaeology; social media; theory; archaeological practice

References

  • Alcock, S.E , Dufton, J.A., & Durusu-Tanrıover, M. (2016). Archaeology and the MOOC: Massive, open, online, and opportunistic. Journal of Social Archaeology. 16, 3-31. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Austin, M. (2014). Archaeological blogging and engagement. In D. Rocks-Macqueen and C. Webster (Eds.), Blogging Archaeology (9-19). Edinburgh: Landward Research.Google Scholar

  • Balme, J. & Bulbeck, C. (2008). Engendering origins: Theories of gender in sociology and archaeology. Australian Archaeology, 67(1), 3-12.Google Scholar

  • Bonacchi, C. (Ed.). (2012). Archaeology and the Digital: Towards Strategies of Engagement. London: Archetype.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brock, T.P., & Goldstein, L. (2015). Blogging the field school: Teaching digital public archaeology. Internet Archaeology 39. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buckley, R., Morris, M., Appleby, J., King T., O’Sullivan, D., & Foxhall, L. (2013). “The king in the car park”: New light on the death and burial of Richard III in the Grey Friars Church, Leicester, in 1485. Antiquity, 87(336), 519-538.Google Scholar

  • Caraher, W. (2016). Slow archaeology: Technology, efficiency, and archaeological work. In E. W. Avere, J. M. Gordon & D. B. Counts (Eds.), Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: e Potential of Digital Archaeology (421-441). Grand Forks, North Dakota: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.Google Scholar

  • Cascalheira, J., Goncalves, C., & Bicho, N. (2014). Smartphones and the use of customized apps in archaeological projects. The SAA Archaeological Record, 14(5), 20-25.Google Scholar

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cavanagh, A. (2007). Sociology in the Age of the Internet. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • Costa, C. (2013). The habitus of digital scholars. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-17.Google Scholar

  • Daniels, J., Cottom, T. M., & Gregory, K. (Eds.). (2016). Digital Sociologies. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

  • Denning, K. (2004). ‘The storm of progress’ and archaeology for an online public. Internet Archaeology 15. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fangi, G., Piermattei, L., & Wahbeh, W. (2013). Spherical photogrammetry as rescue documentation for the reconstruction of some UNESCO sites in Syria. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, 2(3), 335-341.Google Scholar

  • Graham, S. (2015). Mapping the structure of the archaeological web. Internet Archaeology 39. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, S., Weingart, S., & Milligan, I. (2012). Getting started with topic modeling. In W. Turkel & A. Crymble (Eds.), The Programming Historian 2. Retrieved from http://programminghistorian.org/lessons/topic-modeling-and-malletGoogle Scholar

  • Holtorf, C. (2004). The future of electronic scholarship. Internet Archaeology 15. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huggett, J. (2004). Archaeology and the new technological fetishism. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 15, 81-92.Google Scholar

  • Huggett, J. (2015a). Challenging digital archaeology. Open Archaeology. 1(1), 79-85. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huggett, J. (2015b). A manifesto for an introspective digital archaeology. Open Archaeology. 1(1), 86-95. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huggett, J. & Ross, S. (2004). Themed issue edited by Jeremy Huggett and Seamus Ross. Internet Archaeology 15. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jeffrey, S. (2012). A new digital Dark Age? Collaborative web tools, social media and long-term preservation. World Archaeology, 44(4), 553-70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, M. (1999). Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet, 4(1), 83-91. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kintigh, K.W. (2015). Extracting information from archaeological texts. Open Archaeology. 1(1), 96-101. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Law, M., & Morgan, C. (2014). The archaeology of digital abandonment: Online sustainability and archaeological sites. Present Pasts, 6(1), 1-0.Google Scholar

  • Lindgren, S. (2013). New Noise. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Llobera, M. (2011). Archaeological visualization: towards an archaeological information science (AISc), Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 18, 193-223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lumbreras, L.G. (2005). Arqueología y Sociedad. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

  • Lupton, D. (2014). Digital Sociology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Marwick, B. (2013). Discovery of emergent issues and controversies in anthropology using text mining, Topic modeling, and social network analysis of microblog content. In Y. Zhao & Y. Cen (Eds.), Data Mining Applications with R (63-93). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • McDavid, C. (2004). Towards a more democratic archaeology? The Internet and public archaeological practice. In N. Merriman (Ed.), Public Archaeology, (159-187). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • McGuire, R.H. (2002). A Marxist Archaeology. Clinton Corners, New York: Pecheron Press.Google Scholar

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Morgan, C., & Eve, S. (2012). DIY and digital archaeology: What are you doing to participate? World Archaeology, 44, 521-537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morgan, C., & Pallascio, P.M. (2015). Digital media, participatory culture, and difficult heritage: Online remediation and the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage, 4(3), 260-278.Google Scholar

  • O’Neil, M. (2009). Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

  • Orton-Johnson, K. & Prior, N. (Eds.). (2013). Digital Sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Perry, S. (2015). Changing the way archaeologists work: blogging and the development of expertise, Internet Archaeology 39. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, S., Shipley, L., & Osborne, J. (2015). Digital media, power and (in)equality in archaeology and heritage. Internet Archaeology 38. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, S. & Beale, N. (2015). The social web and archaeology’s restructuring: Impact, exploitation, disciplinary change. Open Archaeology, 1(1). doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rabinowitz, A. (2016). Response:Mobilizing (ourselves) for a critical digital archaeology. In E.W. Averett, J.M. Gordon & D.B. Counts (Eds.), Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology (493-518). Grand Forks, North Dakota: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.Google Scholar

  • Rainie, L. & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Richardson, L-J. (2012). Twitter and archaeology: An archaeological network in 140 characters or less. In C. Bonacchi (Ed.), Archaeologists and the Digital: Towards Strategies of Engagement (15-24). London: Archetype.Google Scholar

  • Richardson, L-J. (2013). A digital public archaeology? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 23(1), 1-12.Google Scholar

  • Roosevelt, C., Cobb, P., Moss, E.,Olson, B., & Ünlüsoy, S. (2015). Excavation is destruction digitization: advances in archaeological practice. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40, 325-346.Google Scholar

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. (K.H. Wolff, Ed.). Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Trigger, B.G. (2006). A History of Archaeological Thought (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ucko, P. (1992). Foreword. In P. Reilly & S. Rahtz (Eds.), Archaeology and the Information Age: A Global Perspective (VII-IX). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Walker, D. (2014). Decentering the discipline? Archaeology, museums and social media. Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 1, 77-102.Google Scholar

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Williams, T. (2015). Syria: The hurt and the rebuilding. Conservation And Management Of Archaeological Sites, 17(4), 299-301.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-02-20

Accepted: 2017-06-14

Published Online: 2017-08-24

Published in Print: 2017-01-26


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 139–148, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0008.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jane Malcolm-Davies
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, Volume 364, Page 012031

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in