Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open Access

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

CiteScore 2018: 1.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.339
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.726

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Provenance Study of Prehistoric Ceramics from Sicily: A Comparative Study between pXRF and XRF

Davide Tanasi
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Virtualization and Applied Spatial Technologies (CVAST) & Department of History, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Robert H. Tykot / Frederick Pirone / Erin McKendry
Published Online: 2017-09-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0013

Abstract

The 1964 archaeological exploration of the Ognina islet near Syracuse, Sicily, has provided evidence suggesting a long-term prehistoric occupation from the Neolithic to the Middle Bronze Age. Maltese style ceramics were found in Early and Middle Bronze Age layers. A small group of imports belonging to the Thermi Ware culture was found in connection with the local Castelluccian Ware (EBA), and Maltese style Borġ in-Nadur wares were recovered with local Thapsos ceramics (MBA). During fieldwork in 2012, large amounts of ceramics were recovered including new examples of Thermi and Borġ in-Nadur wares as well as large amounts of Castelluccian and Thapsos pottery. In order to ascertain whether the Maltese type pottery was imported from Malta, a program of archaeometric analyses was established. Diagnostic samples belonging to both Maltese-like and Sicilian pottery classes were analyzed with destructive thin sectioning and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and subsequently analyzed with non-destructive portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) together with a sample of Sicilian clay taken from a clay source close to the islet. The analyses demonstrated that the two Thermi Ware samples were locally produced and three out of four Borġ in-Nadur pieces had a Maltese provenance while one of the four being produced in Sicily.

Keywords: Maltese pottery; Sicily; XRF; pXRF; imports; local imitations

References

  • Ashkanani, H. & Tykot, R.H. (2013). Interregional interaction and Dilmun Power in the Bronze Age: A provenance study of ceramics from Bronze Age sites in Kuwait, and Bahrain using non-destructive pXRF analysis. In R.A. Armitage & J.H. Burton (Eds.), Archaeological Chemistry VIII. ACS Symposium Series 1147: 245-267.Google Scholar

  • Bernabò Brea, L. (1966). Abitato neolitico ed insediamento maltese dell’età del Bronzo all’isola di Ognina (Siracusa) e i rapporti fra Sicilia e Malta dal XVI al XIII sec. a. C. Kokalos 12: 41-69.Google Scholar

  • Biehl, P.F., Rassamakin, Y.Y. (2008). Import and Imitation in Archaeology. Langenweißbach: Beier & Beran. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cazzella, A. & Recchia, G. (2012). Tas-Silg: the Late Neolithic megalithic sanctuary and its re-use during the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age. Scienze dell’Antichita, 18: 15-38.Google Scholar

  • Copat, V., Danesi, M., Ruggini, C. (2013). Late Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery from Tas-Silg sanctuary: new research perspectives for the Maltese prehistoric sequence. Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche 18: 39-63.Google Scholar

  • Cultraro, M. & Crispino, A. (2014). Ognina (Siracusa, Prov. di Siracusa), in Notiziario di Preistoria e Protostoria 1.IV, pp. 112-114.Google Scholar

  • Hunt, A. & Speakman, R. (2015). Portable XRF Analysis of Archaeological Sediments and Ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 53: 1-13.Google Scholar

  • Maniatis, Y. (2009). The Emergence of Ceramic Technology and its Evolution as Revealed with the use of Scientific Techniques. In Shortland A.J., Freestone, I.C., Rehren, T. (Eds.), From Mine to Microscope: Advances in the Study of Ancient Technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1-18.Google Scholar

  • McCormick, D.R. (2013). Exploring Potential Applications of Portable X-ray Fluorescence on Earthen Materials from Southeast Mesoamerica. MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4540.Google Scholar

  • Molitor, M. (1988). Pots and Potters of Prehistoric Malta. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

  • Palio, O. (2008). Ognina, Malta e l’Egeo, in Bonanno, A., Militello, P. (Eds.), Malta negli Iblei. Gli Iblei a Malta. Palermo: Officina di Studi Medievali: 7-19.Google Scholar

  • Pirone, F. (2017). Trade, Interaction and Change: Trace Elemental Characterization of Maltese Neolithic to Middle Bronze Age Ceramics Using a Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar

  • Raneri, S., Barone, G., Mazzoleni, P., Tanasi, D., Costa, E. (2015). Mobility of men versus mobility of goods: archaeometric characterization of Middle Bronze Age pottery in Malta and Sicily (15th-13th century BC), Periodico di Mineralogia 84.1: 23-44.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Recchia G. & Fiorentino, G. (2015). Archipelagos adjacent to Sicily around 2200 BC: attractive environments or suitable geo-economic locations? Tagungen des Landesmuseums fur Vorgeschichte Halle Bd. 12/I+II: 1-15.Google Scholar

  • Speakman, R., Little, N.C., Creel, D., Miller, M.R., & Iñañez, J.G. (2011). Sourcing ceramics with portable XRF spectrometers? A comparison with INAA using Mimbres pottery from the American Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 3483-3496.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stremtan, C., Ashkanani, H., Tykot, R.H. & Puscas, M. (2014). Constructing a Database for pXRF, XRD, ICP-MS and Petrographic Analyses of Bronze Age Ceramics and Raw Materials from Failaka Island (Kuwait). In R.B. Scott, D. Braekmans, M. Carremans & P. Degryse (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium for Archaeometry. Leuven, Belgium: Centre for Archaeological Sciences, KU Leuven, pp. 274-279.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2005). Mycenaean Pottery Imports and Local Imitations: Sicily VS Southern Italy. In Laffineur, R., Greco, E. (Eds.), Emporia. Aegeans in Central and Eastern Mediterranean. Aegaeum 25: 561-569.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2008). La Sicilia e l’arcipelago maltese nell’eta del Bronzo Medio. Palermo: Officina Studi Medievali.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2010). Bridging the gap. New data on the relationship between Sicily, the Maltese Archipelago and the Aegean in the Middle Bronze Age. Mare Internum 2: 111-119.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2011). The Prehistoric Pottery. In Tanasi, D., Vella, N.C. (Eds), Site, Artefacts, Landscape: Prehistoric Borġ in-Nadur, Malta. Monza: Polimetrica.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2014). Uniti e divisi dal mare. Mobilità di uomini e merci tra la Sicilia e l’arcipelago maltese nel II millennio a.C. In Congiu, M., Miccichè, C., Modeo, S. (Eds.), Viaggio in Sicilia. Racconti, segni e citta ritrovate. Caltanissetta: Sciascia, 99-116.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2015a). The pottery from the excavation campaign of David H. Trump (1959) at the settlement of Borġ in-Nadur. In Tanasi, D., Vella, N.C. (Eds.), The late prehistory of Malta: essays on Borġ in-Nadur and other sites. Oxford: Archaeopress, 35-98.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D. (2015b). Borġ in-Nadur pottery abroad: a report from the Sicilian necropoleis of Thapsos and Matrensa. In Tanasi, D., Vella, N.C. (Eds.), The late prehistory of Malta: essays on Borġ in-Nadur and other sites. Oxford: Archaeopress, 173-184.Google Scholar

  • Tanasi, D., Vella, N.C. (2014). Islands and mobility: exploring Bronze Age connectivity in the south-central Mediterranean. In Van Dommelen, P., Knapp B. (Eds.), The Cambridge Prehistory of the Bronze and Iron Age Mediterranean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184-201.Google Scholar

  • Trump, D.H. (2004-2005). Ognina: a puzzling prehistoric site in Sicily. Malta Archaeologica Review 7: 55-60.Google Scholar

  • Tykot, R.H., White, N.M., Du Vernay, J.P., Freeman, J.S., Hays, C.T., Koppe, M., Hunt, C.N., Weinstein, R.A., & Woodward, D.S. (2013). Advantages and Disadvantages of pXRF for Archaeological Ceramic Analysis: Prehistoric Pottery Distribution and Trade in NW Florida. In Armitage, R.A. & Burton, J.H. (Eds.), Archaeological Chemistry VIII. (ACS Symposium Series). Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 233-244.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-11-30

Accepted: 2017-06-25

Published Online: 2017-09-13

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 222–234, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0013.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in