Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Modelling Physical and Digital Replication: Bridging the Gap Between Experimentation and Experience

Andrea Dolfini
  • Corresponding author
  • Newcastle University, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, Armstrong Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Rob Collins
  • Newcastle University, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, Armstrong Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-03-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0002

Abstract

The replication of objects lies at the heart of material culture research in archaeology. In particular, replication plays a key role in a number of core activities in our discipline including teaching, research, and public engagement. Despite its being fundamental to the archaeological process, however, replication comes across as an under-theorised field of artefact research. The problem is compounded by the recent development of digital technologies, which add a new layer of challenges as well as opportunities to the long-established practice of making and using physical copies of objects. The paper discusses a number of issues with artefact replication including aims, design, and methodology, from the standpoint of two research projects currently coordinated by the authors: the Bronze Age Combat project, which explores prehistoric fighting techniques through field experiments and wear analysis (Dolfini); and the NU Digital Heritage project, which centres upon the digital capture and modelling of Roman material culture from Hadrian’s Wall (Collins). Both projects have actively created replicas in physical or digital media, and direct comparison of the two projects provide a number of useful lessons regarding the role, uses, and limits of artefact replication in archaeology. Bronze Age Combat project: http://research.ncl.ac.uk/cias/research/bronzeagecombat/ NU Digital Heritage project: http://research.ncl.ac.uk/cias/research/nudigitalheritage/

Keywords: Object replication; experimental archaeology; experience; digital technologies; Bronze Age; Roman

References

  • Allen, I. M., Britton, D., & Coghlan, H. H. (1968). Metallurgical reports on British and Irish Bronze Age implements and weapons in the Pitt Rivers Museum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Audouze, F. (1999). New advances in French prehistory. Antiquity, 73, 167-175.Google Scholar

  • Bar-Yosef, O. & Van Peer, P. (2009). The chaîne opératoire approach in Middle Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 50(1), 103-131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bell, M. (2015). Experimental archaeology at the crossroads: A contribution to interpretation or evidence of ‘xeroxing’? In R. Chapman, A. Wylie, A. (Eds.), Material Evidence: Learning from archaeological practice (pp. 42-58). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Burgess, C. & Colquhoun, I. (1988). The Swords of Britain. Prähistorische Bronzefunde IV(5). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

  • Chatterjee, H. J. (Ed.). (2008). Touch in museums: Policy and practice in object handling. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

  • Coles, J. (1973). Archaeology by Experiment. London: Hutchinson. Crellin, R. J., Dolfini, A., Uckelmann, M. & Hermann, R. (in press). An experimental approach to prehistoric violence and warfare? In A. Dolfini, R. J. Crellin, Ch. Horn, M. Uckelmann (Eds.), Prehistoric Warfare and Violence: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Cunningham, P., Heeb, J. & Paardekooper, R. (2008), Introduction. In P. Cunningham, J. Heeb & R. Paardekooper (Eds.), Experiencing archaeology by experiment (pp. v-ix). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Dolfini, A. & Crellin, R. J. (2016). Metalwork wear analysis: The loss of innocence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66, 78-87.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Doonan, R. C. P. (2013). Monstrous fallacies and the assembly of archaeometallurgical experiments, In D. Dungworth, R. C. P. Doonan (Eds.), Accidental and experimental archaeometallurgy (pp. 83-98). London: Historical Metallurgy Society.Google Scholar

  • Doonan, R. & Boyd, M. (2008). CONTACT: Digital Modelling of Object and Process in Artefact Teaching. In H. J. Chatterjee (Ed.), Touch in Museums: Policy and practice in object handling (pp. 107-120). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

  • Doonan, R. C. P. & Dungworth, D. (2013). Experimental archaeometallurgy in perspective. In D. Dungworth, R. C. P. Doonan (Eds.), Accidental and experimental archaeometallurgy (pp. 1-10). London: Historical Metallurgy Society.Google Scholar

  • English Heritage (2009). Metric survey specifications for cultural heritage. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar

  • English Heritage (2011). 3D Laser scanning for heritage: Advice and guidance to users on laser scanning in archaeology and architecture (2nd ed.) Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar

  • Gallace, A. & Spence, C. (2008). A memory for touch: The cognitive psychology of tactile memory. In H. J. Chatterjee (Ed.), Touch in Museums: Policy and practice in object handling (pp. 163-186). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

  • Gauch Jr., H. G. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Geneste, J.-M. (1989). Economie des resources lithiques dans le Moustérien du sud-ouest de la France. In M. Otte (Ed.), L’homme de Néandertal, vol. 6, La subsistence (pp, 75-97). Liege: Universite de Liege.Google Scholar

  • Hansen, C. (2008). Experiment and experience - Practice in a collaborative environment. In P. Cunningham, J. Heeb, & R. Paardekooper (Eds.), Experiencing archaeology by experiment (pp. 69-80). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Heeb, J. (2014). Copper shaft-hole axes and early metallurgy in south-eastern Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

  • Heeb, J. & Ottaway, B. S. (2014). Experimental archaeometallurgy. In B. J. Roberts, Ch. P. Thornton (Eds.), Archaeometallurgy in global perspective: Methods and syntheses (pp. 161-192). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Hermann, R., Dolfini, A., Crellin, R. J. & Uckelmann, M. (in press). Researching Bronze Age swordsmanship: experiments and wear analysis. In L. Deutscher, M. Kaiser, & S. Wetzler (Eds.), The Sword: Form and Thought. Martlesham, Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar

  • Hurcombe, L. (2008). Organics from inorganics: using experimental archaeology as a research tool for studying perishable material culture. World Archaeology, 40(1), 83-115.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hurcombe, L. (2014). Perishable material culture in prehistory: investigating the missing majority. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the Environment: Essays on livelihood, dwellings and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kemenczei, T. (1991). Die Schwerter in Ungarn II (Vollgriffschwerter). Prähistorische Bronzefunde IV(9). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

  • Kienlin, T. L. & Ottaway, B. S. (1998). Flanged axes of the north-alpine region: An assessment of the possibilities of use-wear analysis on metal artefacts. In C. Mordant, M. Perno, V. Rychner (Eds.), L’Atelier du bronzier en Europe du XX au VIII siècle avant notre ère, vol. II (pp. 271-286). Paris: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifique.Google Scholar

  • Mathieu, J. R. (2002). Introduction. In J. R. Mathieu (Ed.), Experimental Archaeology: Replicating past objects, behaviors, and processes (pp. 1-11). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

  • Mathieu, J. R. & Mayer, D. A. (2002). Reconceptualizing experimental archaeology: Assessing the process of experimentation. In J. R. Mathieu (Ed.), Experimental Archaeology: Replicating past objects, behaviors, and processes (pp. 73-82). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

  • Millson, D. C. E. (2010). Introduction. In D. C. E. Millson (Ed.), Experimentation and interpretation: The use of experimental archaeology in the study of the past (pp. 1-6). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Molloy, B. (2008). Martial arts and materiality: A combat archaeology perspective on Aegean swords of the fifteenth and fourteenth centuries BC. World Archaeology, 40(1), 116-134.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Molloy, B., Wiśniewski, M., Lynam, F., O’Neill, B., O’Sullivan, A. &Peatfield, A. (2016) Tracing edges: A consideration of the applications of 3D modelling for metalwork wear analysis on Bronze Age bladed artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Sciences, 76, 79-87.Google Scholar

  • Northover, P. (1988). The analysis and metallurgy of British Bronze Age swords. In C. Burgess, I. Colquhoun. The Swords of Britain. Prähistorische Bronzefunde IV(5). (pp. 130-146). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

  • O’Flaherty, R. (2007). A weapon of choice: Experiments with a replica Irish Early Bronze Age halberd. Antiquity, 81, 423-434.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • O’Flaherty, R., Gilchrist, M. D. & Cowie, T. (2011). Ceremonial or deadly serious? New insights into the function of Irish Early Bronze Age Halberds. In M. Uckelmann, M. Mödlinger (Eds.), Warfare in Bronze Age Europe: Manufacture and Use of Weaponry (pp. 39-52). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

  • Outram, A. (2008). Introduction to experimental archaeology. World Archaeology, 40(1), 1-6.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Renaud, A. (2002). Memory and the digital world: A few philosophical pointers for New Memory Practices in the information era. Museum International, 54(3), 8-18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reynolds, P. J. (1999). The nature of experiment in archaeology. In A. F. Harding (Ed.), Experiment and design: Archaeological studies in honour of John Coles (pp. 156-162). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Russell, M. & Manley, H. (2016). Sanctioning memory: Changing Identity. Using 3D laser scanning to identify two ‘new’ portraits of the Emperor Nero in English antiquarian collections. Internet Archaeology, 42. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.42.2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlanger, N. (1990). Techniques as human action: Two perspectives. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 18-26.Google Scholar

  • Schlanger, N. (2005). The chaîne opératoire. In C. Renfrew, P. Bahn (Eds.), Archaeology: The key concepts (pp. 25-31). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Sorensen, M-L. (2015). ’Paradigm lost’ - on the state of typology within archaeological theory. In K. Kristiansen, L. Šmejda, J. Turek (Eds.), Paradigm found: Archaeological theory present, past and future (pp. 84-94). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Soriano-Llopis, I. & Gutiérrez-Sáez, C. (2009). Use-wear analysis on metal: the influence of raw material and metallurgical production processes. In Archaeometallurgy in Europe, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference (Aquileia 2007). (pp. 115-124). Milan: Associazione Italiana di Metallurgia.Google Scholar

  • Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2008). Making sense of touch. In H. J. Chatterjee (Ed.), Touch in museums: Policy and practice in object handling. (pp. 21-40). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

  • Zimmer, R., Jefferies, J. & Srinivasan, M. (2008). Touch technologies and museum access. In H. J. Chatterjee (Ed.), Touch in Museums: Policy and practice in object handling. (pp. 150-159). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-05-03

Accepted: 2017-08-21

Published Online: 2018-03-16


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 36–49, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0002.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Stuart Eve
Open Archaeology, 2018, Volume 4, Number 1, Page 114

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in