Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

‘Figures in 3D’: Digital Perspectives on Cretan Bronze Age Figurines

Christine Morris / Alan Peatfield / Brendan O’Neill
Published Online: 2018-03-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0003

Abstract

The largest corpus of clay figurines from the Cretan Bronze Age comes from ritual mountain sites known as peak sanctuaries. In this paper, we explore how the ‛Figures in 3D’ project contributes to our understanding of these figurines, aiding in the study of the technologies of figurine construction and the typological analysis of distinctive styles. We discuss how the project has, more unexpectedly, begun to create new dialogues and opportunities for moving between the material and the digital by taking a multifaceted approach that combines the data from 3D models and 3D prints with experimental work in clay.

Keywords : 3D scanning and modelling; Minoan; Cretan Bronze Age; terracotta figurines; archaeological representation

References

  • Adams, E. (2017). Cultural Identity in Minoan Crete: Social Dynamics in the Neo-Palatial Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Arnott, R. (1999). Healing Cult in Minoan Crete. In P. P. Betancourt, V. Karageorghis, R. Laffineur, & W.-D. Niemeier (Eds.), MELETEMATA: Studies in Aegean Archaeology Presented to Malcolm H. Wiener as He Enters His 65th Year, Aegaeum 20 (pp. 1-6). Liege/Austin.Google Scholar

  • Bevan, A. (2014). 3D archaeology: low-cost, high-volume and crowd-sourced, Software Sustainability Institute, 23.7.14. Avaliable at: https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2016-09-30-3d-archaeology-now-low-cost-high-volume-and-crowdsourced (last accessed 20.7.17).Google Scholar

  • Bevan, A., Li, X., Martinón-Torres, M., Green, S., Xia, Y., Zhao, K., Zhao, Z., Ma, S., Cao, W. & Rehren, T. (2014). Computer vision, archaeological classification and China’s terracotta warriors. Journal of Archaeological Science 49, 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Birchnell, T. & Urry, J. (2016). A New Industrial Future?: 3D Printing and the Reconfiguring of Production, Distribution, and Consumption. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bosanquet, R. C., Dawkins, R. M., Tod, M. N., Duckworth, W. H. & Myres, J. L. (1902/3). Excavations at Palaikastro II. Annual of the British School at Athens 9, 274-387.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, F. R. (2007). Beyond the Cult of the Replicant, Museums, Objects - new discourses - traditional concerns. In F.R. Cameron & S. B. Kenderdine (Eds.), Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: a Critical Discourse (pp. 49-77). Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

  • Carlson, E. E. (2014). Representation and Structure Conflict in the Digital Age: Reassessing Archaeological Illustration and the Use of Cubist Techniques in Depicting Images of the Past, Advances in Archaeological Practice 2:4, 269-284.Google Scholar

  • Chrysoulaki, S. (2001). The Traostalos peak sanctuary: aspects of spatial organization. In R. Hägg & R. Laffineur (Eds.), Potnia. Deities and Religion in the Aegean Bronze Age, Aegaeum 22 (pp. 57-66). Liege.Google Scholar

  • Counts, D. B., Averett, E. W. & Garstki, K. (2016). A fragmented past: (re)constructing antiquity through 3D artefact modelling and customised structured light scanning at Athienou-Malloura, Cyprus, d 90, 206-218.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco, P., Camporesi, C., Galeazzi, F. & Kallmann, M. (2015). 3D Printing and Immersive Visualization for Improved Perception of Ancient Artifacts. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 24(3), 243-264.Google Scholar

  • Garstki, K. (2017). Virtual Representation: the Production of 3D Digital Artifacts, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24 (3), 726-750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heath, S. (2015). Closing gaps with low-cost 3D. In B. Olson & W. Caraher (Eds.), Visions of substance: 3D imaging in Mediterranean archaeology (pp. 53-62). Grand Forks, ND: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.Google Scholar

  • Jeffrey, S. (2015). Challenging heritage visualisation: beauty, aura and democratisation. Open Archaeology 1, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaimaris, D., Hourmouziadis, G. & Patias, P. (2011). 3D scanning and digital processing used in the study of a Neolithic figurine. Applied Geomatics 3(3), 153-157.Google Scholar

  • Killackey, K. (2016a). Analog to digital and back again, Part I. Savage Minds. Notes and Queries in Anthropology. Available at: https://savageminds.org/2016/01/21/analog-to-digital-and-back-again-part-i/ (last accessed 10.5.17).Google Scholar

  • Killackey, K. (2016b). Analog to digital and back again, Part II. Savage Minds. Notes and Queries in Anthropology. Available at: https://savageminds.org/2016/01/27/analogue-to-digital-and-back-again-part-ii/ (last accessed 10.5.17).Google Scholar

  • Kimball, J. J. L. (2016). 3D Delineation: A Modernisation of Drawing Methodology for Field Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

  • Levoy, M., K. Pulli, B. Curless, S. Rusinkiewicz, D. Koller, L. Pereira, M. Ginzton, S. Anderson, J. Davis, J. Ginsberg, J. Shade & Fulk, D. (2010). The Digital Michelangelo Project: 3D Scanning of Large Statues, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 131-144). New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

  • Means, B. (2013). Virtual Artifact Curation of the Historical Past and the NextEngine Desktop 3D Scanner, Technical Briefs in Historical Archaeology 6, 1-12.Google Scholar

  • Molloy B., Wiśniewski M., Lynam F., O’Neill B., O’Sullivan A. & Peatfield, A. (2016). Tracing edges: A consideration of the applications of 3D modelling for metalwork wear analysis on Bronze Age bladed artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 76, 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.09.007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morris, C. E. (2010). Configuring the individual: bodies of figurines in Minoan Crete. In A.-L. D’Agata, A. van de Moortel, & M.B. Richardson (Eds.), Archaeologies of Cult: Essays on Ritual and Cult in Crete (pp. 180-187). Hesperia Suppl. 42. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar

  • Morris, C. E. (1993). Hands up for the individual! The role of attribution studies in Aegean prehistory, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3, 41-66.Google Scholar

  • Morris, C. E. & Batten, V. (2000). ‘Final Neolithic Pottery From The Atsipadhes Korakias Peak Sanctuary’, Proceedings of the 8th Cretological Conference 1996 (pp. 373-82). Iraklion.Google Scholar

  • Morris, C. E. & Peatfield, A. A. D. (2014). Health and healing on Cretan Bronze Age peak sanctuaries. In D. Michaelides (Ed.), Medicine and Healing in the Ancient Mediterranean (pp. 54-63). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Moser, S. (2004). Archaeological Representation: The Visual Conventions for Constructing Knowledge about the Past. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Archaeological Theory Today (pp. 262-283). Malden, Mass.Google Scholar

  • Myres, J. L. (1902-3). The sanctuary-site of Petsofa. Annual of the British School at Athens 9, 356-87.Google Scholar

  • Nowicki, K. (2007). Some remarks on new peak sanctuaries in Crete: the topography of ritual areas and their relationship with settlements, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 122, 1-31.Google Scholar

  • Nylund, S. (2011). To draw or not to draw? Finds illustration in a digital age. Rubicon Heritage Blog January 25, 2011. Available at: http://www.rubiconheritage.com/2011/01/25/to-draw-or-not-to-draw-finds-illustration-in-a-digital-age/ (last accessed 10.5.17).Google Scholar

  • Papadopoulos, J. & de Jong, P. (2007). The Art of Antiquity: Piet de Jong and the Athenian Agora. Athens, American School of Classical Studies.Google Scholar

  • Papantoniou, G., Loizides, F., Lanitis, A. & Michaelides, D. (2012). Digitization, restoration and visualization of terracotta figurines from the ‘House of Orpheus’, Nea Paphos. In M. Ioannides, D. Fritsch, J. Leissner, R. Davies, F. Remondino & R. Caffo (Eds.), Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, EuroMed 2012 (pp. 543-550). Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Peatfield, A. A. D. (1983). The topography of Minoan peak sanctuaries. Annual of the British School at Athens 78, 273-280.Google Scholar

  • Peatfield, A. A. D. (1987). Palace and peak: the political and religious relationship between palaces and peak sanctuaries. In R. Hägg & N. Marinatos (Eds.), The Function of the Minoan Palaces, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium at the Swedish Institute in Athens 1984 (pp. 89-93). Stockholm: Svenska institutet i Athen.Google Scholar

  • Peatfield, A. A. D. (1990). Minoan peak sanctuaries: History and Society. Opuscula Atheniensis 18, 117-131.Google Scholar

  • Peatfield, A. A. D. (1992). Rural ritual in Bronze Age Crete: The peak sanctuary at Atsipadhes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2, 59-87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peatfield, A. A. D. (2009). The topography of Minoan peak sanctuaries revisited. In A.-L. D’Agata, A. van de Moortel, and M. B. Richardson (Eds.), Archaeologies of Cult: Essays on Ritual and Cult in Crete (pp. 251-310). Hesperia Suppl. 42. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar

  • Peatfield, A. A. D. & Morris, C. E. (2012). Dynamic spirituality on Minoan peak sanctuaries. In K. Rountree, C. E. Morris, A. A. D.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peatfield (Eds.), Archaeology of Spiritualities (pp. 227-245). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Pilali-Papasteriou, A. (1989). Social evidence from the interpretation of Middle Minoan figurines. In I. Hodder (Ed.), The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression (pp. 97-102). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Rabinowitz, A. (2015). The work of archaeology in the age of digital surrogacy. In B. Olson & W. Caraher (Eds.), Visions of substance: 3D imaging in Mediterranean archaeology (pp. 27-42). Grand Forks, ND: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.Google Scholar

  • Rethemiotakis, G. (1997). Minoan clay figures and figurines: manufacturing techniques. In R. Laffineur and P.P. Betancourt (Eds.), TEXNH: Craftsmen, Craftswomen, and Craftsmanship in the Aegean Bronze Age (pp. 117-121). Liege.Google Scholar

  • Rethemiotakis, G. & Christakis, K. S. (2011). Landscapes of power in Protopalatial Crete: new evidence from Galatas, Pediada. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 53, 195-218.Google Scholar

  • Rutkowski, B. (1991). Petsophas. A Cretan peak sanctuary. Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • White, R. (2010). What is spatial history? Spatial History Project, Center for Spatial and Textual Analysis (CESTA). Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/group/spatialhistory/cgi-bin/site/pub.php?id=29 (last accessed 15.5.17).Google Scholar

  • White, S. (2015). Virtual archaeology - The NextEngine Desktop laser scanner. Archaeology International 18, 41-44. http://doi.org/10.5334/ai.1804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zubrow, E. (2006). Digital archaeology: The historical context. In T. L. Evans & P. Daly (Eds.), Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory (pp. 10-31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-07-16

Accepted: 2018-02-05

Published Online: 2018-03-15


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 50–61, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0003.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Stuart Eve
Open Archaeology, 2018, Volume 4, Number 1, Page 114

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in