Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

By All Means Necessary – 2.5D and 3D Recording of Surfaces in the Study of Southern Scandinavian Rock Art

Christian Horn
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute for Historical Studies and Swedish Rock Art Research Archive, Gothenburg University, Box 200, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Johan Ling / Ulf Bertilsson / Rich Potter
Published Online: 2018-03-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0005

Abstract

Southern Scandinavia is Europe’s richest region in terms of figurative rock art. It is imperative to document this cultural heritage for future generations. To achieve this, researchers need to use the most objective recording methods available in order to eliminate human error and bias in the documentation. The ability to collect more data is better, not only for documentation, but also for research purposes. Recent years have seen the wider introduction of image based 2.5D and 3D modelling of rock art surfaces. These methods are Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI), Structure from Motion (SfM), and Optical Laser Scanning (OLS). Importantly, these approaches record depth difference and the structure of engraved lines. Therefore, they have clear advantages over older methods such as frottage (rubbings) and tracing. Based on a number of short case studies, this paper argues that 2.5D and 3D methods should be used as a standard documentation techniques, but not in an exclusionary manner. The best documentation, enabling preservation and high-quality research, should employ all methods. Approaching rock art with all the research tools available we can re-appraise older documentation as well as investigate individual action and the transformation of rock art.

Keywords: rock art; documentation; Reflectance Transformation Imaging; Structure from Motion; Optical Laser Scanning; southern Scandinavia; Tanum; Bronze Age

References

  • Almgren, O. (1927). Hällristningar och kultbruk. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar

  • Bengtsson, L. (2004). Bilder vid vatten. Gothenburg: Gothenburg UniversityGoogle Scholar

  • Bertilsson, U. (2015a). Examples of application of modern digital techniques and methods: Structure for motion (SfM) and multi-view stereo (MvS) for three-dimensional documentation of rock carvings in Tanum creating new opportunities for interpretation and dating. In F. Troletti (Ed.), Prospects for prehistoric Rock Art research: XXVI Valcamonica Symposium, 57-62. Capo di Ponte: Centro camuno di studi preistorici.Google Scholar

  • Bertilsson, U. (2015b). From folk oddities and remarkable relics to scientific substratum: 135 years of changing perceptions on the rock carvings in Tanum in northern Bohuslan, Sweden. In J. Ling, P. Skoglund, & U. Bertilsson (Eds.), Picturing the Bronze Age, (pp. 5-20). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

  • Bertilsson, U., Ling, J., Bertilsson, C., Potter, R., & Horn, C. (2017). The Kivik tomb - Bredaror enters into the digital arena - documented with OLS, SfM and RTI. In S. Bergerbrant & A. Wessmann (Eds.), New Perspectives on the Bronze Age: Proceedings from the 13th Nordic Bronze Age Symposium, held in Gothenburg 9th June to 13th June 2015, (pp. 289-306). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

  • Coles, J. (2004). Bridge to the Outer World: Rock Carvings at Bro Utmark, Bohuslan, Sweden. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 70. 173-205. DOI:10.1017/S0079497X0000116X.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cultural Heritage Imaging. (2013). Reflectance Transformation Imaging. http://culturalheritageimaging.org/Technologies/RTI/index.html (accessed 13 June 2017).Google Scholar

  • Diaz-Guardamino, M., Garcia Sanjuan, L., Wheatley, D., & Zamora, V.R. (2015). RTI and the study of engraved rock art: A re-examination of the Iberian south-western stelae of Setefilla and Almaden de la Plata 2 (Seville, Spain). Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 2 (2-3). 41-54. DOI:10.1016/j.daach.2015.07.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Earl, G., Martinez, K. & Malzbender, T. (2010). Archaeological applications of polynomial texture mapping: Analysis, conservation and representation. Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (8). 2040-2050.Google Scholar

  • Eliasson, T. & Schoberg, H. (1991). U-Pb dating of the post-kinematic Sveconorwegian (Grenvillian) Bohus granite, SW Sweden: Evidence of restitic zircon. Precambrian Research 51 (1). 337-350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fredell, A. (2003). Bildbroar: Figurativ bildkommunikation av ideologi och kosmologi under sydskandinavisk bronsålder och förromersk järnålder. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar

  • Fredell, A. & Quintela, G. V. (2010). Body Attributes and Semantic Expressions: Knees in rock art and Indo-European symbolism. In A. Fredell, K. Kristiansen & F. Criado Boado (Eds.), Representations and Communications: Creating an Archaeological Matrix of Late Prehistoric Rock Art, (pp. 75-92). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

  • Freij, H. (1993). Rock carving, a virtually unlimited source of data for statistical data analysis. In G. Arwidsson (Ed.), Sources and Resources: Studies in Honour of Birgit Arrhenius, (pp. 545-549). Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe.Google Scholar

  • Fuglestvedt, I. (1999). Adorants, voltigeurs and other mortals: An essay on rock art and the human body. In J. Goldhahn (Ed.), Rock art as social representation, (pp. 76-100). Oxford: Archaeopress. Google Scholar

  • Gillings, M. & Pollard, J. (1999). Non‐portable stone artefacts and contexts of meaning: The tale of Grey Wether (www.museums.ncl.ac.uk/Avebury/stone4.htm). World Archaeology 31 (2). 179-193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldhahn, J. (2016). Sagaholm: North European Bronze Age rock art and burial ritual. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

  • Goldhahn, J. & Ling, J. (2013). Bronze Age Rock Art in Northern Europe: Contexts and Interpretations. In H. Fokkens & A. F. Harding (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age, (pp. 270-290). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Horn, C. (2016). Cupmarks. Adoranten 2015. 29-43.Google Scholar

  • Horn, C. & Potter, R. (2017). Transforming the Rocks: Time and Rock Art in Bohuslan, Sweden. European Journal of Archaeology.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kneisel, J., Hinz, M. & Rinne, C. (2014). Radon-B. http://radon-b.ufg.uni-kiel.de (accessed 10 May 2017).Google Scholar

  • Lindqvist, C. (1994). Fångstfolkets bilder: En studie av de nordfennoskandiska kustanknutna jägarhällristningarna. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar

  • Ling, J. (2008). Elevated rock art. Towards a maritime understanding of Bronze Age rock art in northern Bohuslän, Sweden. Gothenburg: SOLANA.Google Scholar

  • Ling, J. & Bertilsson, U. (2016). Biography of the Fossum Panel. Adoranten 2015. 1-16.Google Scholar

  • Ling, J. & Cornell, P. (2010). Rock art as secondary agent? Society and agency in Bronze Age Bohuslan. Norwegian Archaeological Review 43 (1). 26-43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malzbender, T., Gelb, D. & Wolters, H. (2001). Polynomial texture maps. In L. Pocock (Ed.), Computer graphics annual conference series: Vol. 2001. Computer graphics: SIGGRAPH 2001: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, (pp. 519-528). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

  • Mudge, M., Malzbender, T., Schroer, C. & Lum, M. (2006). New Reflection Transformation Imaging Methods for Rock Art and Multiple-Viewpoint Display. In M. Ioannides, D. Arnold, F. Niccolucci & K. Mania (Eds.), The 7th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Geneve: The Eurographics Association.Google Scholar

  • Mudge, M., Schroer, C., Noble, T., Matthews, N., Rusinkiewicz, S. & Toler-Franklin, C. (2012). Robust and Scientifically Reliable Rock Art Documentation from Digital Photographs. In J. McDonald & P. M. Veth (Eds.), A companion to rock art, (pp. 644-659). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Nilsson, P. (2012). The beauty is in the act of the beholder: South Scandinavian rock art from a uses of the past perspective. In I.-M. Back Danielsson, F. Fahlander & Y. Sjostrand (Eds.), Encountering imagery: Materialities, perceptions, relations, (pp. 77-96). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar

  • Nordbladh, J. (1981). Knowledge and information in swedish petroglyph documentation” In C.-A. Moberg (Ed.), Similar finds? Similar interpretations? Glastonbury - Gothenburg - Gotland ; nine essays, G1-G79. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University. Google Scholar

  • Olsen, J., Hornstrup, K.M., Heinemeier, J., Bennike, P. & Thrane, H. (2011). Chronology of the Danish Bronze Age based on 14C dating of cremated bone remains. Radiocarbon 53 (2). 261-275.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Orange, R. (2016). Norwegian youths who ‘ruined’ 5,000-year-old rock carving could face prosecution. The Telegraph, July 31st, 2016. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/31/norwegian-youths-who-ruined-5000-year-old-carving-could-facepro/ (accessed 16 March 2017).Google Scholar

  • Peacock, E. E., Lindgaard, E., Sognnes, K., Saterhaug, R. & Turner-Walker, G. (2015). The open-air rock-art site at Leirfall, Central Norway, within the context of northern Scandinavian rock-art conservation and management practices over the past 50 years. In H. Steberglokken, R. Berge, E. Lindgaard & H. Vangen Stuedal (Eds.), Ritual landscapes and borders within rock art research: Papers in honour of Professor Kalle Sognnes, (pp. 82-97). Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology.Google Scholar

  • Randsborg, K. & Christensen, K. (2006). Bronze Age Oak-coffin Graves: Archaeology & Dendrodating. Acta Archaeologica 77 (1). 1-246. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0390.2006.00049.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reu, J. de, Plets, G., Verhoeven, G., Smedt, P. de, Bats, M., Cherrette, B., Maeyer, W. de, Deconynck, J., Herremans, D., Laloo, P., Meirvenne, M. van & Clercq, W. de. (2013). Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage. Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2). 1108-1121. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sapirstein, P. (2016). Accurate measurement with photogrammetry at large sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 66. 137-145. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.002.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Toreld, A. & Andersson, T. (2015). Ny dokumentation av Kiviksgravens hallbilder. Fornvännen 110. 10-26.Google Scholar

  • Toreld, A. & Andersson, T. (2016). Kiviksgravens hallbilder-komplettering och rekonstruktionsforslag. Fornvännen 111. 46-48.Google Scholar

  • Uckelmann, M. (2012). Die Schilde der Bronzezeit in Nord-, West- und Zentraleuropa. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-03-30

Accepted: 2017-11-13

Published Online: 2018-03-15


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 81–96, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0005.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in