Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Community Art: Communities of Practice, Situated Learning, Adults and Children as Creators of Cave Art in Upper Palaeolithic France and Northern Spain

Liliana Janik / Jessica Cooney Williams
Published Online: 2018-05-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0014

Abstract

This paper presents acts of fluting as tangible expressions of activities performed by Palaeolithic communities of practice, in which situated learning was part of the social transmission of knowledge and communities of practice include children, men and women. To identify individual members of the communities of practice who were involved in the creation of parietal art in the Franco-Cantabrian region we have analysed the age and the sex of the people who ‘decorated’ the caves. Secondly, by following the analysis of lines created by flutings by different members of the community of practice, we suggest that children under the age of seven, who had no the cognitive abilities to comprehend the meaning of images, were active and prolific fluters and performed acts of decorating cave walls by themselves or with the support of other community members. This approach allows us to consider parietal art as community art where visual contributions were created by community members of all age and sexes.

Keywords : Palaeolithic art; community of practice; situated learning

References

  • Bahn, P. G. (1998). The Cambridge illustrated history of prehistoric art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bahn, P. G. ( 2003). Location, location: What can the positioning of cave and rock art reveal about Ice Age motivations? In A. Pastoors & G. C. Weniger (Eds.), Höhlenkunst und Raum: Archäologische und architektonische Perspektiven (pp. 11-20). Dusseldorf: Jan van der Most.Google Scholar

  • Bahn, P. G. (2011). Religion and ritual in the Upper Palaeolithic. In T. Insoll (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of ritual and religion (pp. 344-357). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bahn, P. G. & Vertut, J. (1997). Journey Through the Ice Age. Berkeley , CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Barth, F. (1987). Cosmologies in the making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

  • Bender, B. (1995). The roots of inequality. In M. Dodson & J. Palmer (Eds.), Design and Aesthetics: A reader (pp. 190-195). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bettencourt, A., Sanches, M. J., Alves, L. B., & Fabregas Valcarce, R. (2010). Conceptualising space and place on the role of agency, memory and identity in the construction of space from the Upper Palaeolithic to the Iron Age in Europe: an introduction. In Bettencourt, A. M. S., Jesus Sanches, M., Alves, L. B, & Fabregas Valcarce, R. (Eds.), Conceptualising Space and Place. Proceedings of the XV World Congress (Lisbon, 4-9 September 2006) (pp. 1-3). Oxford: BAR International Series 2058.Google Scholar

  • Chazine, J.-M., & Noury, A. (2006). Sexual determination of hand stencils on the main panel of the GuaMasri II Cave (East-Kalimantan/Borneo - Indonesia). International Newsletter on Rock Art, 44, 21-6.Google Scholar

  • Clottes, J. (2009). Sticking bones into cracks in the Upper Palaeolithic. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Becoming human: Innovation in prehistoric material and spiritual culture (pp. 195-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Clottes, J. (2010). Cave art. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar

  • Clottes, J. (2013). Consequences of the discovery and study of the Chauvet Cave. In K. Sachs-Hombach & J. R. J. Schirra (Eds.), Origins of pictures (pp. 46-71). Cologne: Herbert von Halem Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Cooney, J. (2014). The Child in the cave: the contribution of non-adults to the creation of cave art and community in the Upper Palaeolithic. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Conkey, M. (1978). Style and information in cultural evolution: towards a predictive model for the Palaeolithic. In C. Redman, M. J. Berman, E. V. Curtin, W. T. Langhorne Jr., N. M. Versaggi & J. C. Wanser (Eds.), Social archaeology: Beyond sustenance and dating (pp. 61-85). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Conkey, M. (2001). Hunting for images, gathering up meanings: art for life in hunting-gathering societies. In C. Panter-Brick, R. H. Layton, P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-gatherers: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 267-291). The Biological Social Society Series, 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Conkey, M. (2009). Materiality and meaning-making in the Palaeolithic ‘arts’. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Becoming Human: Innovation in Prehistoric Material and Spiritual Culture (pp. 179-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cundill, G., Roux, D. J., & Parker. J. N. (2015). Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society 20(2): art22 http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07580-200222CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferrer, E., O’Hare, E. D., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Fluid reasoning and the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3(1), 46-51.Google Scholar

  • Foucher, P., San Juan-Foucher, C., & Rumeauy, Y. (2007). La grotte de Gargas. Un siècle de découvertes. Saint-Laurent-de-Neste: Communaute de communes du canton de Saint-Laurent-de-Neste.Google Scholar

  • Fritz, C., Tosello, G., & Conkey, M. W. (2016). Reflections on the identities and roles of the artists in European Paleolithic societies. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 1307-1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9265-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gálvez Lavin, N. & Cacho Toca, M. W. (2010). Hornos de la Pena, In F. O. Goyarrola (Ed.), Las Cuevas con arte Paleolítico en Cantabria (pp. 145-150). Santander: Gobierno de Cantabria.Google Scholar

  • Gamble, C. (1982). Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society. Man, New Series 17, 92-107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gamble, C. (1983). Culture and society in the Upper Palaeolithic in Europe. In G.N. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter-Gatherer economy in prehistory (pp. 201-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gamble, C. (1986). The Palaeolithic settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gamble, C. (1999). The Palaeolithic societies of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gamble, C. (2010). Palaeolithic society and the release from proximity: A network approach to intimate relations. World Archaeology 29(3), 426-449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia Diez, M., & Garrido Pimentel, D. (2010). Las Chimeneas. In F.O Goyarrola (Ed.), Las Cuevas con arte Paleolítico en Cantabria (pp. 205-210). Santander: Gobierno de Cantabria.Google Scholar

  • Garcia Diez, M. & R. Gutierrez Rodriquez. (2010a). El Castillo. In F.O Goyarrola (Ed.), Las Cuevas con arte Paleolítico en Cantabria (pp. 179-190). Santander: Gobierno de Cantabria.Google Scholar

  • Geertz, C. (1976). Art as a cultural system. Modern Language Notes, 91, 1473-1499.Google Scholar

  • Gogtay, N., Giedd, Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A.C. , Nugent, T.F., Herman, D. H. , Clasen, L. S. , Toga, A.W. , Rapoport, J.L., & Thompson, P.M. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(21), 8174-8179.Google Scholar

  • Groënen, M. (1997). Ombre et lumières dans l’art des grottes. Cahiers d’etudes VI. Bruxelles: Universite Libre de Bruxelle.Google Scholar

  • Groënen, M. (2012). Recorridos decorada por la Cueva de El Castillo. 373-394. Arte artistas sin: una mirada al Paleolithic [exposicion celebrada en el] Arqueologico Museo Regional, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, de diciembre de 2012 abril de 2013. https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/142099/1/Groenen-Recorridos.pdf. (11.10.2014)Google Scholar

  • Guthrie, R. D. (2005). The nature of Paleolithic art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincha, R. & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641-653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, A. M. (2008). Handprints in French Upper Paleolithic parietal art: A comparative analysis of age and sex using current subadult data. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.Google Scholar

  • Hewlett, B. S., & Cavalli‐Sforza, L. L. (1986). Cultural transmission among Aka pygmies. American Anthropologist, 88(4), 922-934.Google Scholar

  • Jochim, M. (1982). Palaeolithic cave art in ecological perspective. In G. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter- Gatherer economy in prehistory (pp. 212-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jones, A. (2007). Memory and material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kuechler, S. (1987). Malangan: art and memory in a Melanesian society. Man, New Series, 22(2), 238-55.Google Scholar

  • Laming-Emperaire, A. (1959). Lascaux: Paintings and engravings. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar

  • Laming-Emperaire, A. (1962). La Signification de l’Art Rupestre Paléolithique. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar

  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activit, 3(3), 149-164Google Scholar

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lee, L., Reinicke, B., Sarkar, R., & Anderson, R. (2015). Learning through interactions: Improving project management through communities of practice. Project Management Journal 46(1): 40-52.Google Scholar

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Les religions de la préhistoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1965). Préhistoire de l’art occidental. Paris: Lucien Mazenod.Google Scholar

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1967). The art of prehistoric man in western Europe. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1976). Interpretation esthetique et religieuse des figures et symbols dans la prehistoire. Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, 42, 5-15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D. (2002). The mind in the cave: consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D. (2009). Of people and pictures. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Becoming Human: Innovation in prehistoric material and spiritual culture (pp. 135-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lorblanchet, M. (1991). Spitting images: Replicating the spotted horses of Pech Merle. Archaeology, 44(6), 24-31.Google Scholar

  • Lorblanchet, M. (1995). Les grottes ornées de la préhistoire: nouveaux regards. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C. (2007). The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19751-19756.Google Scholar

  • Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behaviour, and health. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

  • Manning, J. T. (2009). The finger ratio: sex, behaviour and disease revealed in the fingers. London: Faber.Google Scholar

  • Manning, J. T., & Taylor, R. P. (2001). Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: Implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 22(1), 61-9.Google Scholar

  • Mellars, P. (2009). Cognition and climate: why is Upper Palaeolithic cave art almost confined to the Franco-Cantabrian region? In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Becoming human: Innovation in prehistoric material and spiritual culture (pp. 212-231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mithen, S. (1991). Ecological interpretations of Palaeolithic art. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 57(1), 103-14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moure Romanillo, A., Gonzales Sainz, C., Bernaldo de Quiros, F., & Cabrera Valdes, V. (1996). Dataciones absolutas de pigmentos en cuevas cantabricas: Altamira, El Castillo, Chimeneas y Las Monedas. In A. Moure Romanillo (Ed.), El Hombre Fosil 80 Años Despues (pp. 295-324). Santander: Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar

  • Nowell, A. (2015). Learning to see and seeing to learn: children, communities of practice and Pleistocene visual cultures. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25(4), 889-899.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: Social learning through the second year. Developmental Psychology, 4, 555-565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nielsen, M., & Tomaselli, K. (2010). Overimitation in Kalahari Bushman children and the origins of human cultural cognition. Psychological Science, 21(5), 729-736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, M., Mackenzie, K., & Bryden, P. (2002a). Finger Length and Distal Finger Extent Patterns in Humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 117(3), 209-17.Google Scholar

  • Peters, M., Tan, U., Kang, Y., Teixeira, L., & Mandal, M. (2002b). Sex-Specific Finger- Length Patterns Linked to Behavioural Variables: Consistency across Various Human Populations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94(1), 171-81.Google Scholar

  • Pike, A. W., Hoffmann, D. L., Garcia-Diez, M, Pettitt, P. B., Alcolea, J., De Balbin, R., Gonzalez-Sainz, C., de las Heras, C., Lasheras, J. A., Montes, R., & Zilhao, J. (2012). U-series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science, 336(6087), 1409-1413.Google Scholar

  • Porr, M. (2010). Palaeolithic Art as Cultural Memory: a Case Study of the Aurignacian Art of Southwest Germany. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20(1), 87-108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roveland, B. (2000). Footprints in the clay: Upper Palaeolithic children in ritual and secular contexts. In J. Sofaer (Ed.), Children and material culture (pp. 29-38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Rowlands, M. (1992). The Role of Memory in the Transmission of Culture. World Archaeology, 25(2), Conceptions of Time and Ancient Society, 141-151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Priest, K. L., Saucier, D. A. & Eiselein, G. (2016). Exploring students’ experiences in first-year learning communities from a situated learning perspective. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(3), 361-371.Google Scholar

  • San Miguel Llamosas, C. & Munoz Fernandez, E. (2010). Cudon. In F.O Goyarrola (Ed.), Las Cuevas con arte Paleolítico en Cantabria (pp. 157-165). Santander: Gobierno de Cantabria.Google Scholar

  • Scherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., Kimchi, R., & Luna, B. (2009). Emergence of Global Shape Processing Continues through Adolescence. Child Development, 80(1), 162-177.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. (2004). Incised linear markings: animal or human origin? Rock Art Research, 21, 57-84.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L. (2004). Children and Paleolithic ‘art’: indications from Rouffignac cave, France. International Newsletter on Rock Art, 38, 9-17.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L. (2006a). Evidence for cave marking by Palaeolithic children. Antiquity, 80(310), 937-947.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L. (2006b). Finger flutings in Chamber A1 of Rouffignac Cave, France. Rock Art Research, 23(2), 179-198.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L. (2006c). The study of finger flutings. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(03), 281-295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L. (2007). More about ‘More about finger flutings’. Rock Art Research, 24(1), 133-135.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L. (2009). Paleolithic finger flutings as efficient communication: Applying Zipf’s Law to two panels in Rouffignac Cave, France. Semiotica, 177, 157-175.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, K., Van Gelder, L., & Bednarik, R. G. (2006). Finger flutings in chamber A1 of Rouffignac Cave, France. Rock Art Research, 23(2), 179.Google Scholar

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2003). The Roots of Power: Animate Form and Gendered Bodies.Google Scholar

  • Peru, I.L.: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Snow, D. R. (2006). Sexual Dimorphism in Upper Palaeolithic Hand Stencils. Antiquity, 80, 390-404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snow, D. R. (2013), Sexual dimorphism in European Upper Palaeolithic cave art. American Antiquity, 78(4), 746-761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stapert, D. (2007). Finger flutings by Palaeolithic children in Rouffignac Cave: comments on a paper by Sharpe & Van Gelder. Antiquity 81(312): https://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/stapert312/Google Scholar

  • Tate-Art Term. Community art, http://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/c/community-art (28.06.2017)Google Scholar

  • Toga, A. W., Thompson, P. M., & Sowell, E. R. (2006). Mapping brain maturation. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(3), 148-159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-691.Google Scholar

  • Valladas, H., Cachier, H., Maurice, P., de Quiros, F. B., Clottes, J., Valdes, V. C. , Uzquiano, P., & Arnold, M. (1992). Direct radiocarbon dates for prehistoric paintings at the Altamira, El Castillo and Niaux caves. Nature 357, 68-70.Google Scholar

  • Van Gelder, L., (2015). Counting the children: The role of children in the production of finger flutings in four upper palaeolithic caves. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34(2), 119-138.Google Scholar

  • Vercoutère, C., San Juan-Foucher, C., & Foucher, P. (2006). Human modifications on cave bear bones from the Gargas cave (Hautes-Pyrenees, France). Scientific Annals, School of Geology Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 98, 257-261.Google Scholar

  • Verpoorte, A. (1996). Networks in ancient times. Archaeological Dialogues 3, 71-76CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system. (Published in the “Systems Thinker,” June 1998). PDF, eduhk.hk (10.11.2017).Google Scholar

  • Whitehouse, H. (1992). Memorable religions: transmission, codification and change in divergent Melanesian contexts. Man, New Series, 27(4), 777-799.Google Scholar

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253-76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiessner, P. (1984). Reconsidering the behavioural basis for style: A case study among the Kalahari San. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 3, 190-234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, S. B., Matlen, B. J., Baym, C. L., Ferrer, E., & Bunge, S. A. (2008). Neural correlates of fluid reasoning in children and adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1(8), 1-8.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-06-30

Accepted: 2018-03-01

Published Online: 2018-05-12


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 217–238, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0014.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in