Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Archaeology

Editor-in-Chief: Harding, Anthony

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6560
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Complexities of Metal Detecting Policy and Practice: A Response to Samuel Hardy, ‘Quantitative Analysis of Open-Source Data on Metal Detecting for Cultural Property’ (Cogent Social Sciences 3, 2017)

Pieterjan Deckers
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of History, Archaeology, Art, Philosophy and Ethics, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andres Dobat
  • School of Culture and Society - Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Natasha Ferguson / Stijn Heeren
  • Department of Archaeology, Classics and Near Eastern Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Michael Lewis / Suzie Thomas
Published Online: 2018-06-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0019

Abstract

In his paper ‘Quantitative analysis of open-source data on metal detecting for cultural property’, Samuel Hardy suggested that permissive policy is ineffective in minimizing the damage done to cultural heritage by non-professional metal detecting. This response paper contests the basic assumptions upon which this analysis is based. While Hardy‘s comparative, quantitative approach is laudable, it is founded in a biased and simplistic outlook on the metal detecting phenomenon.

Keywords: archaeological metal detecting; heritage management; public archaeology

References

  • Baastrup, M. P., & Feveile, C. (2013). Treasure trove - samarbejdet mellem finder, lokalmuseum og Nationalmuseum. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 2013, 284-295.Google Scholar

  • Bailie, W. R. (2017). An Assessment of the Extent and Character of Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Scotland. Historic Environment Scotland. http://historicenvironment.scot/archives-and-research/publications/publication/?publicationId=3de69b89-5f55-481e-9819-a70c00990d96Google Scholar

  • Barford, P. (2010). Archaeology, Collectors and Preservation: A Reply to David Gill. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 20, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bland, R. (2005). A pragmatic approach to the problem of portable antiquities: The experience of England and Wales, Antiquity, 79, 440-447. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bland, R. (2009). The Development and Future of the Treasure Act and Portable Antiquities Scheme. In S. Thomas and P.G.Google Scholar

  • Stone (Eds.), Metal Detecting and Archaeology (pp. 63-86). Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar

  • Bland, R., Bryant, S., Chadwick, A., Garland, N., Ghey, E., Haselgrove, C., Mattingly, D., Moorhead, S., Robbins, K., Rogers, A., & Taylor, J. (forthcoming). Iron Age and Roman Coin Hoards in Britain. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

  • Brindle, T. (2014). The Portable Antiquities Scheme and Roman Britain. Research Publication 196. London: The British Museum.Google Scholar

  • Daubney, A. J. (2016). Portable Antiquities, Palimpsests, and Persistent Places: A Multi-Period Approach to Portable Antiquities Scheme Data in Lincolnshire. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar

  • Daubney, A. (2017). Floating Culture: The Unrecorded Antiquities of England and Wales, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23, 785-99. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deckers, P. (forthcoming). Archaeological Metal Detecting by Amateurs in Flanders: Legislation, Policy and Practice of a Hobby. In S. Campbell, S. Thomas & L. White (Eds.), Competing Values in Archaeological Heritage. Springer.Google Scholar

  • Deckers, P. (2013). Past, Present and Future of Archaeological Metal-Detecting by Amateurs in Flanders (Belgium), AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 3, 13-17.Google Scholar

  • Deckers, P., Bleumers, L., Ruelens, S., Lemmens, B., Vanderperren, N., Marchal, C., Pierson, J., & Tys, D. (2016a). MEDEA: Crowd-Sourcing the Recording of Metal-Detected Artefacts in Flanders (Belgium), Open Archaeology, 2, 264-77. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deckers, P., Lewis, M., & Thomas, S. (2016b). Between Two Places: Archaeology and Metal-Detecting in Europe, Open Archaeology, 2, 426-29. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dobat, A. S. (2013). Between Rescue and Research: An Evaluation after 30 Years of Liberal Metal Detecting in Archaeological Research and Heritage Practice in Denmark, European Journal of Archaeology, 16, 704-25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dobat, A. S., Christiansen, T. T., Risager, C. M., Henriksen, M. B., Holst, M. K., Laursen, S. V. & Eve, S. (in press 2018). The DIME project: Background, status and future perspectives of the user driven recording scheme for metal detector finds ´DIgitale MEtaldetektorfund’, Danish Journal of Archaeology.Google Scholar

  • Dobat, A. S., & Jensen, A. T. (2016). ‘Professional Amateurs’. Metal Detecting and Metal Detectorists in Denmark, Open Archaeology, 2, 70-84. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dutch Heritage Law 2016: Besluit van 8 april 2016, houdende regels voor archeologische opgravingen (Besluit Erfgoedwet archeologie), Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stb-2016-155.html.Google Scholar

  • Felson, M., & Boba, R. (2010). Crime and Everyday Life (fourth edition). London, Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Ferguson, N. (2013). Biting the Bullet: The Role of Hobbyist Metal Detecting within Battlefield Archaeology, Internet Archaeology, 33. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, N. (2016). Lost in Translation: Discussing the Positive Contribution of Hobbyist Metal Detecting, Open Archaeology 2, 115-26. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fowler, P. (2007). Not archaeology and the media. In T. Clack & M. Brittain (Eds.), Archaeology and the Media (pp. 89-107). Walnut Creek CA: Leftcoast Press.Google Scholar

  • Fox, A. (2013). The Lord’s prerogative and an act of trust: portable antiquities in the Isle of Man, Internet Archaeology, 33. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gransard-Desmond, J.-O. (2013). Can We Really Differentiate between Treasure Hunters and Non-Professional Archaeologists?, Internet Archaeology, 33. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guttormsen, T. S., & Swensen, G. (Eds.). (2016). Heritage, Democracy and the Public: Nordic Approaches. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Haldenby, D., & Richards, J. D. (2010). Charting the Effects of Plough Damage Using Metal-Detected Assemblages, Antiquity, 84, 1151-62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hardy, S. A. (2017). Quantitative Analysis of Open-Source Data on Metal Detecting for Cultural Property: Estimation of the Scale and Intensity of Metal Detecting and the Quantity of Metal-Detected Cultural Goods, Cogent Social Sciences 3: 1298397. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heeren, S. (2009). Romanisering van rurale gemeenschappen in de Civitas Batavorum: De casus Tiel-Passewaaij. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed. http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/15248Google Scholar

  • Herva, V.-P., Koskinen-Koivisto, E., Seitsonen, O., & Thomas, S. (2016). ‘I Have Better Stuff at Home’: Treasure Hunting and Private Collecting of World War II Artefacts in Finnish Lapland, World Archaeology 48, 267-81. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Immonen, V., & Kinnunen, J. (2017). ‘Quidditching’ and the Emergence of New Heritage Identities - Amateur Metal Detecting in Finland, Public Archaeology (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2017.1352188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karl, R. (2011). On the Highway to Hell: Thoughts on the Unintended Consequences for Portable Antiquities of § 11(1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz, The Historic Environment 2, 111-133. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karl, R., & Möller, K. (2016). Empirische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses der Anzahl von MetallsucherInnen im deutschbritischen Vergleich. Oder: wie wenig Einfluss die Gesetzeslage hat, Archäologische Informationen, 39, 215-26.Google Scholar

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography. In R. Mansell & P. H. Ang (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society (pp. 653-660). Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067/abstract.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Labelle, J. (2003). Coffee Cans and Folsom Points: Why We Cannot Continue to Ignore the Artefact Collectors. In L. Zimmerman, K. Vitelli, and J. Hollowell-Zimmer (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Archaeology (pp. 115-127). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

  • Lecroere, T. (2016). ‘There Is None So Blind as Those Who Won‘t See’: Metal Detecting and Archaeology in France, Open Archaeology 2, 182-93. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, M. (2016). A Detectorist’s Utopia? Archaeology and Metal-Detecting in England and Wales, Open Archaeology, 2, 127-39. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, M. (2017). Portable Antiquities Annual Report 2016. British Museum: London.Google Scholar

  • Mackenzie, S. (2014). Illicit Antiquities, Trafficking Culture Encyclopedia, http://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/terminology/illicit-antiquities/Google Scholar

  • Makowska, A., Oniszczuk, A., & Sabaciński, M. (2016). Some Remarks on the Stormy Relationship between the Detectorists and Archaeological Heritage in Poland, Open Archaeology, 2, 171-181. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marc (2004). How Often Do You Metal Detect?, TreasureNet (online forum). http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/votingbooth/720-how-often-do-you-metal-detect.html.Google Scholar

  • Oksanen, E., & Lewis, M. (2015). Medieval Markets and Portable Antiquities Scheme, Medieval Settlement Research, 30, 54-59.Google Scholar

  • Onroerend Erfgoed (2016). Code van Goede Praktijk voor Archeologie en Metaaldetectie. https://www.onroerenderfgoed.be/nl/beheer/de-code-van-goede-praktijk/Google Scholar

  • Parol, J., & Richardson, I. (2017). Treasure Annual Report 2015. British Museum: London. https://finds.org.uk/documents/treasurereports/2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • PAAG - Portable Antiquities Advisory Group (2017). Code of Practice for Reponsible Metal Detecting in England and Wales (2017 Revision). PAAG: London. https://finds.org.uk/getinvolved/guides/codeofpracticeGoogle Scholar

  • Portable Antiquities Scheme (n.d.). Prioritising Recording Guidance. https://finds.org.uk/getinvolved/guides/recordingguidanceGoogle Scholar

  • Pendleton, M. R. (1998), Policing the Park: Understanding Soft Enforcement, Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 552-71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pitblado, B. (2014). An argument for ethical, proactive, archaeologist-artifact collector collaboration, American Antiquity, 79, 385-400. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pollard, T. (2009). ‘The Rust of Time’: Metal Detecting and Battlefield Archaeology. In S. Thomas and P.G. Stone (Eds.), Metal Detecting and Archaeology (pp. 181-202). Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar

  • Renfrew, C. (2000). Loot, Legitimacy and Ownership: The Ethical Crisis in Archaeology. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

  • Rasmussen, J. M. (2014). Securing Cultural Heritage and Fencing Stolen Goods? A Case Study on Museums and Metal Detecting in Norway, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47, 83-107.Google Scholar

  • Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed (2016). Vrijwilligers in de Archeologie en de Erfgoedwet, Amersfoort: RCE.Google Scholar

  • Robbins, K. J. (2013). Balancing the Scales: Exploring the Variable Effects of Collection Bias on Data Collected by the Portable Antiquities Scheme, Landscapes, 14, 54-72.Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez Temino, I., & Roma Valdés, A. (2015). Fighting against the Archaeological Looting and the Illicit Trade of Antiquities in Spain, International Journal of Cultural Property, 22, 111-130. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roymans, N., & Heeren, S., with cooperation of Hoeks, R. (2017). Doe mee met PAN. Het belang van archeologische vondsten in privé-bezit, Archeologie in Nederland, 1, 18-25.Google Scholar

  • Scherzler, D., & Siegmund, F. (2015). Tübingen theses on archaeology, Archäologische Informationen, 39 (2016), 9-18.Google Scholar

  • Schlanger, N. (2017) Brexit in Betwixt. Some European Conjectures on its Predictability and Implications, The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shott, M. (2017). Estimating the Magnitude of Private Collection of Points and Its Effects on Professional Survey Results: A Michigan Case Study, Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5, 125-137. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SuALT Project (2017). SuALT Project. Suomen arkeologisten löytöjen linkitetty tietokanta (project blog), http://blogs.helsinki.fi/sualt-project/.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, S. (2012). Searching for Answers: A Survey of Metal-Detector Users in the UK, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18, 49-64. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, S. (2016). The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach, Open Archaeology, 2, 140-149. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, S., Seitsonen, O., & Herva, V.-P. (2016) Nazi memorabilia, dark heritage and treasure hunting as “alternative” tourism: Understanding the fascination with the material remains of World War II in Northern Finland, Journal of Field Archaeology, 41, 331-343.Google Scholar

  • Williams, D. (1997). Late Saxon Stirrup-Strap Mounts: A Classification and Catalogue. CBA Research Report 11. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar

  • Winkley, F. (2016). The Phenomenology of Metal Detecting: Insights from a Unique Type of Landscape Experience, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 25, 1-15. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wrzosek, J. (2017). Poszukiwania Zabytków Ruchomych, w Tym Zabytków Archeologicznych, w Świetle Obowiązujących Przepisów. Uwagi Archeologa, Kurier Konserwatorski, 14, 41-45.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-03-16

Accepted: 2018-05-16

Published Online: 2018-06-21


Citation Information: Open Archaeology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 322–333, ISSN (Online) 2300-6560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0019.

Export Citation

© 2018 Pieterjan Deckers, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in