Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Political Science

Editor-in-Chief: de Mucci, Raffaele

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8042
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Antiquization processes in the Macedonian, Kazakh and Turkmen National Narratives: Visual constructs that shape political conceptions

Agata Rogoś
Published Online: 2018-11-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2018-0008

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to conduct the analysis of the national symbols systems in the public space of Skopje (Macedonia), Astana (Kazakhstan) and Aşgabat (Turkmenistan) that are being represented in national political discourses along with a wide interpretation and contextualization in the framework of the postsocialist process of reconstruction of national symbolism in order to indicate identity and restoration structures and development of the actual national discourse in Macedonia, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. In the actual process of reconstruction of national symbols system in analyzed cultural traditions it is important to underline the influence of nationalist ideology, which both in the Balkans and Central Asia has appeared in the form of ethno-nationalisms, where such factors as: language, history, culture and religion have been of crucial importance for construction of the idea of community that defined particular ethnos. One of the most influential tools of national ideology is taking the advantage of historical arguments aiming to expose the previous control over certain territory through the power structure, introduced by the present day nation.

Keywords: nationalism; monuments; antiquization; Kazakh; Turkmen; Macedonian identity

References

  • Akbarzadeh, Sh. “National identity and political legitimacy in Turkmenistan.” Nationalities Papers 27 (1999): 271-290.Google Scholar

  • Anderson, B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London-New York: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Appadurai, A. 1988 Putting Hierarchy In Its Place. Cultural Anthropology 3(1):36-49.Google Scholar

  • 1990 Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Public Culture 2(2): 1-24.Google Scholar

  • Billig M., 1995, Banal Nationalism, Sage.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu P., 2001, Reguły sztuki. Geneza i struktura pola literackiego, Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar

  • Brubaker R., 1997, Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brunnbauer, U. The Ambigous Nation. Case Studies from Southeastern Europe in the 20th Century. (2013). Eds. Grandits, H. U. Brunnbauer, Munchen.Google Scholar

  • Clement, V. 2014, “Articulating national identity in Turkmenistan: inventing tradition through myth, cult and language.” Nations and Nationalism 20 (3): 546-562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clifford, James 1988 The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Connor W., 1994, Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Čausidis N. “Proektot Skopje 2014: Skici za edno naredno istražuvanje.” (2013). Web. 10.01.2014 <http://www.okno.mk/sites/default/files/082-Nikos-Chausidis-Skopje-2014.pdf>.Google Scholar

  • Dimova, R. Ethno-Baroque: Materiality, Aesthetics, and Conflict in Modern-Day Macedonia. New York-London: Berghahn, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Eriksen T.H., 2013, Etniczność i nacjonalizm, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar

  • Foucault, M. Power / Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York, 1980.Google Scholar

  • Fraenkel, E. and Ch. Kramer. Eds. Language Contact: Language Conflict. Peter Lang Publishing, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Freedberg D., 2005, Potęga wizerunków. Studia z historii i teorii oddziaływania, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar

  • Gadamer H.G., 1993, Prawda i metoda. Zarys hermeneutyki filozoficznej, Kraków.Google Scholar

  • Geertz C., 2005, Interpretacja kultur. Wybrane eseje, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar

  • Geisler M.E., (red.) 2005, National Symbols, Fractured Identities: Contesting the National Narrative, University Press of New England.Google Scholar

  • Gellner E., 1991, Narody i nacjonalizm, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Gould R.M., and E.R. Silverman. “Stumbling Upon History: Collective Memory and the Urban Landscape”, Geojournal 78/5 (2013): 791-801.Google Scholar

  • Gupta, A., 1988, Space and Time in the Politics of Culture. Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar

  • Hosling, G. and G. Schöpflin. Eds. Myths and nationhood. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Janev G. “Skopje 2014: Erasing Memories, Building History.” (2015). Balkan Heritages: Negotiating History and Culture. Eds. Couroucli M. and T. Marinov, Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kertzer D., 2010, Rytuał, polityka i władza, Warszawa. King, R. Minorities under Communism Nationalities as a Source of Tension among Balkan Communist States. Cambridge, 1973.Google Scholar

  • Kolozova K. “Skopje 2014 Project and its Effects on the Perception of Macedonian Identity Among the Citizens of Skopje: Policy Brief.” (2013). Skopje: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities. Web. 11.06.2016 <http://isshs.edu.mk/documents/1.-Sk2014-ENG.pdf>.Google Scholar

  • Kopbayeva D. “Is Astana a Nationalistic Project? The Role of Kazakhstan’s New Capital in Development of the National Identity”, 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, AIIC. (2013). Web. 12.06.2016. <http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/1400/1409>.Google Scholar

  • Lambert, G. The Return of the Baroque in Modern Culture. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Löfgren, O. “The Nationalization of Culture.” Ethnologia Europaea: Journal of European Ethnology Vol. XIX (1989): 5-24.Google Scholar

  • Luke T. W. Museum Politics. Power Plays at the Exhibition, University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Malkki L. National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees, in: “Cultural Anthropology”, Vol. 7, No. 1, Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference. (Feb., 1992),pp. 24-44.Google Scholar

  • Marina O. “Skopje, Great, Greater, Grandeur: City between Solidarity and Exclusivity.” MONU, Greater Urbanism 19 (2013): 76-81.Google Scholar

  • Neofotistos, P. V. The risk of war. Everyday sociality in the Republic of Macedonia. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Nora, P. Eds. Realms of Memory. (trans). A. Goldhammer, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Omelicheva, M. Y. Eds. Nationalism and Identity Construction in Central Asia Dimensions, Dynamics, and Directions. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Özkirimli, U. Contemporary Debates on Nationalism: A Critical Engagement. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Said, E. 1979 Zionism from the Standpoint of Its Victims. Social Text 1:7-58.Google Scholar

  • Said, E. 1986 After the Last Sky. Palestinian Lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

  • Smith D. A. National Identity. University of Nevada Press, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Smith D. A. Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Smith D.A., 2007, Nacjonalizm. Teoria, historia, ideologia, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Schatz E. Modern Clan Politics: The Power of “Blood” in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle: University of Washigton Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Sperber D., 1975, Rethinking Symbolism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tzonis A. and L. Lefaivre. Classical Architecture: The Poetics of Order, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Vale, L. J. Architecture, Power, and National Identity. Yale: University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Vangeli, A. “Nation-building ancient Macedonian style: the origins and the effects of the so-called antiquization in Macedonia.” Nationalities Papers Vol. 39, No. 1 (2011): 13-32.Google Scholar

  • Vilić N. “Disenzusni kontinuitet sećanja”, Arhitektura 178 (2013): 14-19.Google Scholar

  • Walzer M. 1967, On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought, w: „Political Science Quarterly”, 82, (2), s. 191-204.Google Scholar

  • Zieliński, B. Eds. Wokół Macedonii: siła kultury - kultura siły. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Žižek S. and A. Hamza. From Myth to Symptom. The case of Kosovo. Prishtinë, 2013.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-02-07

Accepted: 2018-10-15

Published Online: 2018-11-20

Published in Print: 2018-11-01


Citation Information: Open Political Science, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 111–123, ISSN (Online) 2543-8042, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2018-0008.

Export Citation

© by Agata Rogoś, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in