Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
New journal!

Open Information Science

Editor-in-Chief: Sturges, Paul

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2451-1781
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Factors Affecting Students’ Privacy Paradox and Privacy Protection Behavior

Maor Weinberger / Dan Bouhnik / Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet
Published Online: 2017-06-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2017-0002

Abstract

In this exploratory study, we investigate the factors affecting two opposite types of online privacy behavior: 1) online privacy paradox, i.e. a mismatch between users’ online privacy attitudes and their online privacy behavior; and 2) online privacy protection. To assess these two types of behavior, we devised a new direct scale comprising 25 items explicitly highlighting benefits and risks of the examined behavior. Various factors related to online privacy and anonymity were considered in light of the existing theories on online privacy behavior. To this end, 169 students from different fields of study in Israeli academia were administered closed-ended questionnaires. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that information science students had a significantly lower tendency toward privacy paradox behavior compared to other students. In addition, we found that as the participants’ privacy concern and online privacy self efficacy increase, their tendency toward privacy paradox behavior decreases. However, surprisingly, there was no significant association between privacy protection behavior and high technical skills or online privacy literacy. This research has social implications for academia and the general public, as it shows that the protection of online privacy does not depend on technical knowledge or complicated tool usage, but rather can be achieved by raising users’ online privacy concern and self-efficacy.

Keywords : online privacy; privacy paradox; privacy concern; online privacy literacy; online privacy self efficacy

References

  • Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347 (6221), 509-514.Google Scholar

  • Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In the proceedings of: the 6th International Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar

  • Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J. (2004). Privacy attitudes and privacy behavior: Losses, gains and hyperbolic discounting. In: J. Camp & R. Lewis (Eds.), Economics of information security (pp. 165-178). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Akhter, S. H. (2014). Privacy concern and online transactions: The impact of Internet self -efficacy and Internet involvement. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31 (2), 118-125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andrade, E. B., Kaltcheva, V., & Weitz, B. (2002). Self-disclosure on the Web: The impact of privacy policy, reward, and company reputation. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 350-353.Google Scholar

  • Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30 (1), 13-28.Google Scholar

  • Aydin, O. M., & Chouseinoglou, O. (2013). Fuzzy assessment of health information system users’ security awareness. Journal of Medical Systems, 37 (6).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baek, Y. M., Kim, E. M., Bae, Y. (2014). My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: Why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 48-56.Google Scholar

  • Baddeley, M. (2011). A behavioural analysis of online privacy and security. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (CWPE), 1147, 1-26.Google Scholar

  • Barnes, B. S. (2006). A privacy-paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11 (9). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1394/1312.Google Scholar

  • Beuker, S. (2016). Privacy paradox: Factors influencing disclosure of personal information among German and Dutch SNS users. Master’s Thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.Google Scholar

  • Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81 (3), 868-876. Retrieved from http://www.dleg.state.mi.us/mpsc/electric/workgroups/lowincome/internet_gender_gap.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Bronstein, J. (2012). Blogging motivations for Latin American bloggers: A uses and gratifications approach. In T. Dumova (Ed.), Blogging in the global society (pp. 200-215). Hershey, PA: Information Reference.Google Scholar

  • Castañeda, J. A., & Montoro, F. J. (2007). The effect of Internet general privacy concern on customer behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 7 (2), 117-141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005). Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information Technology & Management, 6 (2-3), 181-202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, H. T., & Chen, W. H. (2015). Couldn’t or wouldn’t? The influence of privacy concerns and self-efficacy in privacy management on privacy protection. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 18 (1), 13-19.Google Scholar

  • Cho, H. (2012). Responses to online privacy risks. In: Y. Zheng (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cyber behavior (pp. 900-910). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

  • Cho, H., Lee, J., & Chung, S. (2010). Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (5), 987-995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costante, E., den Hartog, J., & Petkovic, M. (2012). On-line trust perception: What really matters. In the proceedings of: the 1st Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST 2011), Milan, Italy.Google Scholar

  • Culnan, M. J. (1993). “How Did They Get My Name?”: An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quarterly, 17 (3), 341- 361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10 (1), 104-115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A. K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15 (1), 83-108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45 (3), 285-297.Google Scholar

  • Eastin, M. S., Brinson, N. H., Doorey, A, & Wilcox, G. (2016). Living in a big data world: Predicting mobile commerce activity through privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 214-220.Google Scholar

  • Eckersley, P. (2010). How unique is your web browser? In M. J. Atallah & N. J. Hopper (Eds.), Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 10th International Symposium (PETS’ 2010): Vol. 6205. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 1-18). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1143-1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2011). Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In S. Trepte, & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online. Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 19-32). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Feng, Y. & Xie, W. (2014). Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy- protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 153-162.Google Scholar

  • Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009).Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (1), 153-160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodwin, C. (1991). Privacy: Recognition of a consumer right. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10 (1), 149-166.Google Scholar

  • Graeff, T. R., & Harmon, S. (2002). Collecting and using personal data: Consumers’ awareness and concerns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19 (4).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In the proceedings of: the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES ’05), Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar

  • Guo, X. T., Zhang, X. F., & Sun, Y. Q. (2016). The privacy-personalization in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 55-65.Google Scholar

  • Heirman, W., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2013). Predicting adolescents’ disclosure of personal information exchange for commercial incentives: An application of an extended theory of planned behavior. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 16 (2), 81-87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. A. (1999). Information privacy in the marketplace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the Web. The Information Society: An International Journal, 15 (2), 129-139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoy, M. G., & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10 (2), 28-45.Google Scholar

  • Ibrahim, Y. (2008). The new risk communities: Social networking sites and risk. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 4 (2), 245-253.Google Scholar

  • Jensen, C., Potts, C., & Jensen, C. (2005). Privacy practices of Internet users: Self- reports versus observed behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63 (1-2), 203-227.Google Scholar

  • Joinson, A. N., Reips, U. D., & Buchanan, T. (2010). Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25 (1), 1-24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122-134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kolek, E. A., & Saunders, D. (2008). Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 45 (1), 1-25.Google Scholar

  • Lee, H., Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013). Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users’ behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71 (9), 862-877.Google Scholar

  • Lee, J. K., & Letho, X. (2010). E-personalization and online privacy features: the case with travel websites. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4 (March), 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09347.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, J. M., & Rha, J. Y. (2016). Personalization-privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 453- 462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leon, P. G., Blase, U., Wang, Y., Sleeper, M., Balebako, R., Shay, R., et al. (2013). What matters to users? Factors that affect users’ willingness to share information with online advertisers. In proceedings of: the 9th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS ’13), Newcastle: UK.Google Scholar

  • Li, T., & Unger, T. (2012). Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy. European Journal of Information Systems, 21 (6), 621-642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Livingston, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10 (3), 393-411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, J. R. (2009). “Any person... a pamphleteer:” Internet anonymity in the age of Web 2.0. Undergraduate Senior Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

  • Metzger, M. J. (2006). Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on Web site trust and disclosure. Communication Research, 33 (3), 155-179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millett, L. I., Friedman, B., & Felten, E. (2001). Cookies and Web browser design: Toward realizing informed consent online. In the proceedings of: the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’01), Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

  • Milne, G. R., & Boza, M. E. (1999). Trust and concern in consumers: Perceptions of marketing information management practices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13 (1), 5-24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milne, G. R., & Gordon, M. E. (1993). Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social-contract framework. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12 (2), 206-215.Google Scholar

  • Milne, G. R., Rohm, A. J., & Bahl, S. (2004). Consumers’ protection of online privacy and identity. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38 (2), 217-232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41 (1), 100-126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill.Google Scholar

  • O’Neill, D. (2001). Analysis of Internet users’ level of online privacy concerns. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (1), 17-31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ono, H. & Zavodny, M. (2003).Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (1), 111-121.Google Scholar

  • Paine, C., Reips, U. D., Steiger, S., Joinson, A., & Buchanan, T. (2007). Internet users’ perceptions of ’privacy concerns’ and ’privacy actions’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (6), 526-536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Y. J. (2013). Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication Research, 40 (2), 215-236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19 (1), 27-41.Google Scholar

  • Phelps, J. E., D’Souza, G., & Nowak, G. J. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of consumer privacy concerns: An empirical investigation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15 (4), 2-17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pfitzmann, A., & Köhntopp, M. (2001). Anonymity, unobservability, and pseudonymity - a proposal for terminology. In the proceedings of: the International Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, H. Federrath (Ed.), pp. 1-9. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Potoglou, D., Palacios, J. F., & Feijóo, C. (2015). An integrated latent variable and choice model to explore the role of privacy concern on stated behavioral intentions in e- commerce. Journal of Choice Modelling, 17, 10-27.Google Scholar

  • Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1428-1451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rainie, L., Kiesler, S., Kang, R. & Madden, M. (2013). Anonymity, privacy, and security online. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, September 2013. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/oldmedia//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_AnonymityOnline_090513.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Sheehan, K. B. (1999). An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (4), 24-38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheehan, K. B. & Hoy, M. G. (2000). Dimensions of privacy concern among online consumers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19 (1), 62-73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stutzman, F. & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. In the proceedings of: the 28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

  • Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C. H., & Phang, C. W. (2013). Addressing the personalization- privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on Smartphone users. MIS Quarterly, 37 (4), 1141-1164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taddicken, M. (2014). The ’privacy paradox’ in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19 (2), 248-273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Talib, S., Clarke, N. L., & Furnell, S. M. (2010). An analysis of information security awareness within home and work environments. In the proceedings of: the 5th International Conference on Availability, Reliability, and Security, Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, D. G., Davis, D. F., & Jillapalli, R. (2009). Privacy concern and online personalization: The moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electronic Commerce Research, 9 (3), 203-223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., Eicher, C., Fischer, M., Hennhöfer, A., et al. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS). In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes & P. de Hert (Eds.), Reforming European data protection law (pp.333-365). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 28 (1), 20-36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246 (4935), 1232-1233.Google Scholar

  • Wills, C. E., & Zeljkovic, M. (2011). A personalized approach to web privacy: Awareness, attitudes and actions. Information Management & Computer Security, 19 (1), 53-73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Xu, H., Luo, X. R., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51 (1), 42-52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Xu, F., Michael, K., & Chen, X. (2013). Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites: An integrated model. Electronic Commerce Research, 13 (2), 151-168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yao, M. Z., & Linz, D. G. (2008). Predicting self-protections of online privacy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11 (5), 615-617.Google Scholar

  • Yoon, S. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (2), 47-62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zafeiropoulou, A. M., Millard, D. E., Webber, C., & O’Hara, K. (2013). Unpicking the privacy paradox: Can structuration theory help to explain location-based privacy decisions? In the proceeding of: the 5th annual ACM Web science conference, Paris, France.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., & Bratspiess, Y. (2014). Professional information disclosure on social networks: the case of Facebook and LinkedIn in Israel. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67 (3), 493-504.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-12-02

Accepted: 2017-04-18

Published Online: 2017-06-27

Published in Print: 2017-06-27


Citation Information: Open Information Science, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 3–20, ISSN (Online) 2451-1781, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2017-0002.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in