Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
New journal!

Open Information Science

Editor-in-Chief: Sturges, Paul

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2451-1781
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Scholarly Communication Practices in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Study of Researchers’ Attitudes and Awareness of Open Access

Bhuva Narayan / Edward J. Luca / Belinda Tiffen / Ashley England / Mal Booth / Henry Boateng
Published Online: 2018-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0013

Abstract

This paper examines issues relating to the perceptions and adoption of open access (OA) and institutional repositories. Using a survey research design, we collected data from academics and other researchers in the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) at a university in Australia. We looked at factors influencing choice of publishers and journal outlets, as well as the use of social media and nontraditional channels for scholarly communication. We used an online questionnaire to collect data and used descriptive statistics to analyse the data. Our findings suggest that researchers are highly influenced by traditional measures of quality, such as journal impact factor, and are less concerned with making their work more findable and promoting it through social media. This highlights a disconnect between researchers’ desired outcomes and the efforts that they put in toward the same. Our findings also suggest that institutional policies have the potential to increase OA awareness and adoption. This study contributes to the growing literature on scholarly communication by offering evidence from the HASS field, where limited studies have been conducted. Based on the findings, we recommend that academic librarians engage with faculty through outreach and workshops to change perceptions of OA and the institutional repository.

Keywords: Scholarly communication; open access; institutional repository; self-archiving; academic social networks

References

  • Association of College & Research Libraries (2003). Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication 1. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6nr5uq4V3)Google Scholar

  • Al-Aufi, A., Fulton, C. (2015). Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: A cross-institutional study. The Electronic Library, 33(2), 224-241.Google Scholar

  • Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services, 30(1), 43-51.Google Scholar

  • Atiso, K., Adkins, D., Borteye Mensah, E. (2017). Knowledge of Open Access Journals Among Research Scientists in Ghana. The Serials Librarian, 73(3-4), 327-337.Google Scholar

  • Bell, S., Fried Foster, N., Gibbons, S. (2005). Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 283-290.Google Scholar

  • Bongiovani, P. C., Guarnieri, G., Babini, D., Lopez, F. A. (2014). Acceso abierto en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario necesidades y practicas de los docentes/ investigadores. Informacion, Cultura y Sociedad, 30, 13-34.Google Scholar

  • Butterwick, S., Dawson, J. (2005,). Undone business: Examining the production of academic labour. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(1), 51-65.Google Scholar

  • Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(S1), 145-161.Google Scholar

  • Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Association of Research Libraries, no. 223 (August 2002): 1-4. http://www.sparc.arl.org/resources/papers-guides/the-case-for-institutional-repositories (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGcL6307)Google Scholar

  • Cullen, R., Chawner, B. (2011). Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: a study of conflicting paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460-470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706-729.Google Scholar

  • Dulle, F. W., M. K. Minishi-Majanja, L. M. Cloete, (2011). The Adoption of Open Access Scholarly Communication in Tanzanian Public Universities: Some Influencing Factors. Mousaion 29(1), 112-135.Google Scholar

  • Elsayed, A. M. (2016). The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: A survey. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 378-391.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fruin, C., Sutton, S. (2016). Strategies for success: open access policies at North American educational institutions. College & Research Libraries, 77(4), 469-499.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Goodfellow, R. (2013). Scholarly, digital, open: an impossible triangle?. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-15.Google Scholar

  • Greenhow, C., Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392-402.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gruzd, A., Goertzen, M. (2013). Wired academia: Why social science scholars are using social media. In: Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3332-3341). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar

  • Jain, P., Bentley, G. Oladiran, M.T. (2009). The role of institutional repository in digital scholarly communications”. In: African Digital Scholarship and Curation Conference (pp. 12-14).Google Scholar

  • Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37-49.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, R. (2002). Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • Kennan, M. A. (2008). Reassembling scholarly publishing: open access, institutional repositories and the process of change (PhD thesis). Sydney: The University of New South Wales. Retrieved from http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/10148Google Scholar

  • Kim, J. (2007). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2), https://journals.tel.org/jodi/index.php/ jodi/article/ view/193/177Google Scholar

  • Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246-254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luca, E., Narayan, B. (2016). Redesigning the open-access institutional repository: A user experience approach. In A. Morishima, A. Rauber, & C. li Liew (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 275-281). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Lwoga, E. T., Questier, F. (2015). Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(1), 37-49.Google Scholar

  • Manca, S., Ranieri, M. (2017). Exploring Digital Scholarship. A Study on Use of Social Media for Scholarly Communication among Italian Academics. In Esposito A. (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the Impact of Digital Technologies on Scholarly Inquiry (pp. 116-141). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

  • Marsh, R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 31(4), 163-195.Google Scholar

  • Mercer, H. (2011). Almost halfway there: An analysis of the open access behaviors of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 443-453.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Narayan, B., Luca, E. (2017). Issues and challenges in researchers’ adoption of open access and institutional repositories: a contextual study of an institutional repository. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 22(4). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/22-4/rails/rails1608.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • National Science Foundation (2014). Reducing investigators’ administrative workload for federally funded research. Report by the National Science Board. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar

  • Nentwich, M., König, R. (2014). Academia goes Facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm. In Opening science (pp. 107-124). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Niyazov, Y., Vogel, C., Price, R., Lund, B., Judd, D., Akil, A., Mortonson, M., Schwartzman, J., Shron, M. (2016). Open access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to Academia.edu. PloS one, 11(2), 1-23.Google Scholar

  • Odell, J., Coates, H., Palmer, K. (2016). Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change. College & Research Libraries News, 77(7), 322-325.Google Scholar

  • Ortega, J. L. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(4), 520-536.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Peekhaus, W., Proferes, N. (2015). How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access. Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 640-661.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ren, X. (2015). The quandary between communication and certification: Individual academics’ views on Open Access and open scholarship. Online Information Review, 39(5), 682-697.Google Scholar

  • Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 604-610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Serrano-Vicente, R., Melero, R., Abadal, E. (2016). Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 595-603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singson, M., Joy, M. G., Thiyagarajan, S., Dkhar, V. (2015). Perceptions of open access publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A survey. International Information & Library Review, 47(1-2), 1-10.Google Scholar

  • Stewart, B. E. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318-340.Google Scholar

  • Stokker, J. (2011). Open access: a widening agenda - an Australian perspective. Paper presented at the IATUL 2011 Conference, Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2011/papers/14/ (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGdDJzwH)Google Scholar

  • Suber, P. (2017). Why Is Open Access Moving So Slowly In The Humanities? Retrieved September 27, 2017, from https://blogapaonline.org/2017/06/08/open-access-in-the-humanities-part-2/ (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGcXh34v)Google Scholar

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.Google Scholar

  • Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Allard, S., Christian, L., Volentine, R., Boehm, R., Nichols, F., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., Herman, E., Watkinson. A. (2016). Trustworthiness and Authority of Scholarly Information in a Digital Age: Results of an International Questionnaire. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2344-2361.Google Scholar

  • Tomaszewski, R., Poulin, S., MacDonald, K. I. (2013). Publishing in discipline-specific open access journals: opportunities and outreach for librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 61-66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • University of Technology Sydney (UTS). (2013). Open Access Policy. Retrieved 21 January, 2017, from: http://www.gsu.uts.edu.au/policies/open-access.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGcr9Ns0)Google Scholar

  • Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: Networked scholars. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Van de Velde, E. (2016). Let IR RIP. Retrieved 30 January, 2017, from: http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGd3de8X)Google Scholar

  • Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647-654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhong, J., Jiang, S. (2016). Institutional repositories in Chinese open access development: Status, progress, and challenges. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 739-744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-02-16

Accepted: 2018-11-01

Published Online: 2018-12-13

Published in Print: 2018-12-01


Citation Information: Open Information Science, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 168–180, ISSN (Online) 2451-1781, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0013.

Export Citation

© by Bhuva Narayan, et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in