Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Other-initiated repair in Lao

N. J. Enfield
Published Online: 2015-03-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0006

Abstract

This article describes the interactional patterns and linguistic structures associated with otherinitiated repair, as observed in a corpus of video-recorded conversation in the Lao language (a Southwestern Tai language spoken in Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia). The article reports findings specific to the Lao language from the comparative project that is the topic of this special issue. While the scope is general to the overall pattern of other-initiated repair as a set of practices and a system of semiotic resources, special attention is given to (1) the range of repair operations that are elicited by open other-initiators of repair in Lao, especially the subtle changes made when problem turns are repeated, and (2) the use of phrase-final particles—a characteristic feature of Lao grammar—in the marking of both other-initiations of repair and repair solution turns.

Keywords: other-initiated repair; final particles; repair operations

References

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2004. “Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology”. Presentation presented at the Bantu grammar: description and theory workshop, February 13. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2007. “Content Interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus Study and Typological Comparison.” International Journal of American Linguistics 73 (2) (April): 133–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and N.J. Enfield. 2013. “Is ‘Huh?’ a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items.” PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark et al. under review. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” Google Scholar

  • Enfield, N. J. 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2010. “Questions and Responses in Lao.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2649–2665. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Enfield, N.J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question–response Sequences in Conversation Across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10) (October): 2615–2619. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, ed. 2013. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic. Google Scholar

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Google Scholar

  • Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2012. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2004. “On Dispensability.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 95–149. Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Selting, Margaret. 1996. “Prosody as an Activity-type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of So-called ‘Astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margaret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-09-26

Accepted: 2014-11-06

Published Online: 2015-03-21


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0006.

Export Citation

© 2015 N. J. Enfield. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in