Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Other-initiated repair across languages: towards a typology of conversational structures

Mark Dingemanse / N. J. Enfield
Published Online: 2015-02-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0007

Abstract

This special issue reports on a cross-linguistic study of other-initiated repair, a domain at the crossroads of language, mind, and social life. Other-initiated repair is part of a system of practices that people use to deal with problems of speaking, hearing and understanding. The contributions in this special issue describe the linguistic resources and interactional practices associated with other-initiated repair in ten different languages. Here we provide an overview of the research methods and the conceptual framework. The empirical base for the project consists of corpora of naturally occurring conversations, collected in fieldsites around the world. Methodologically, we combine qualitative analysis with a comparative-typological perspective, and we formulate principles for the cross-linguistic comparison of conversational structures. A key move, of broad relevance to pragmatic typology, is the recognition that formats for repair initiation form paradigm-like systems that are ultimately language-specific, and that comparison is best done at the level of the constitutive properties of these formats. These properties can be functional (concerning aspects of linguistic formatting) as well as sequential (concerning aspects of the interactional environment). We show how functional and sequential aspects of conversational structure can capture patterns of commonality and diversity in conversational structures within and across languages.

Keywords: typology; conversation; repair

References

  • rd, and Joel Sherzer, eds. 1989. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Benjamin, Trevor. 2012. “When Problems Pass Us By: Using ‘You Mean’ to Help Locate the Source of Trouble.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 82–109. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 2013. “Signaling Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English Conversation.” PhD dissertation, Groningen: University of Groningen. Google Scholar

  • Benjamin, Trevor, and Traci Walker. 2012. “Managing Problems of Acceptability Through High Rise-Fall Repetitions.” Discourse Processes 50 (2): 107–38. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.739143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Besnier, Niko. 1989. “Information Withholding as a Manipulative and Collusive Strategy in Nukulaelae Gossip.” Language in Society 18 (3): 315–41. doi:10.1017/S0047404500013634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. “A Refined Sampling Procedure for Genealogical Control.” STUF-Language Typology and Universals 61 (3): 221–33. Google Scholar

  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex. Google Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L. 2002. “Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure.” In The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-Language, edited by Talmy Givón and Bertram F. Malle, 109–32. Typological Studies in Language, v. 53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

  • Clark, Herbert H., and Edward Schaefer. 1987. “Collaborating on Contributions to Conversations.” Language and Cognitive Processes 2 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/01690968708406350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath, and Balthasar Bickel. 2004. “Leipzig Glossing Rules.” Eva.mpg.de. http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/files/morpheme.html. Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2003. Typology and Universals. 2nd ed. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Curl, Traci S. 2005. “Practices in Other-Initiated Repair Resolution: The Phonetic Differentiation of ‘Repetitions.’” Discourse Processes 39 (1): 1–43. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cysouw, M. 2004. “Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology.” Presentation presented at the Bantu grammar: description and theory workshop, February 13. Google Scholar

  • Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark. 2014. “The Growing Pains of Pragmatic Typology.” Diversity Linguistics Comment. July 10. http://dlc.hypotheses.org/717. Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, Joe Blythe, and Tyko Dirksmeyer. 2014. “Formats for Other-Initiation of Repair across Languages: An Exercise in Pragmatic Typology.” Studies in Language 38 (1): 5–43. doi:10.1075/sl.38.1.01din. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, and Simeon Floyd. 2014. “Conversation across Cultures.” In Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, edited by N. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell, 434–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, Kobin H. Kendrick, and N. J. Enfield. forthcoming. “A Coding Scheme for Other-Initiated Repair across Languages.” Open Linguistics Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rósa S. Gísladóttir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield. under review. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems” Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and N. J. Enfield. 2013. “Is ‘Huh?’ a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items.” PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Trouble in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. “Are Grammatical Relations Universal?” In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, edited by Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 115–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Durie, Mark. 1987. “Grammatical Relations in Acehnese.” Studies in Language 11 (2): 365–99. Google Scholar

  • Egbert, Maria. 1996. “Context-Sensitivity in Conversation: Eye Gaze and the German Repair Initiator Bitte?” Language in Society 25 (04): 587–612. doi:10.1017/S0047404500020820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Enfield, N. J. 2013a. “Doing Fieldwork on the Body, Language, and Communication.” In Handbook Body – Language – Communication, edited by Cornelia Müller, E. Fricke, Alan Cienki, David McNeill, and S. Essendorf. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2013b. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Enfield, N. J., Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Rósa Gísladóttir, Gertie Hoymann, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Lilla Magyari, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Lila San Roque, and Francisco Torreira. 2013. “Huh? What? – A First Survey in 21 Languages.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, edited by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 343–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Enfield, N. J., Kobin H. Kendrick, J. P. de Ruiter, Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2011. “Building a Corpus of Spontaneous Interaction.” In Field Manual Volume 14, edited by Kobin H. Kendrick and Asifa Majid, 29–32. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Google Scholar

  • Enfield, N. J., and Jack Sidnell. 2014. “Language Presupposes an Enchronic Infrastructure for Social Interaction.” In The Social Origins of Language, edited by Daniel Dor, Chris Knight, and Jerome Lewis, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2615–19. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.001. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, Nicholas. 2011. “Semantic Typology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, edited by Jae Jung Song, 504–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Floyd, Simeon, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and Francisco Torreira. in press. “The Timing of Visual Bodily Behavior in Repair Sequences: Evidence from Three Languages.” Discourse Processes Google Scholar

  • Fox, Barbara A., Trevor Benjamin, and Harrie Mazeland. 2013. “Conversation Analysis and Repair Organization: Overview.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar

  • Fox, Barbara A., Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson. 1996. “Resources and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 185–237. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Fox, Barbara A., Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso, and Wilfrido Flores Hernandez. 2009. “A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of the Site of Initiation in Same-Turn Self-Repair.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 60–103. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fries, Charles C. 1952. The Structure of English; an Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Google Scholar

  • Fromkin, Victoria A. 1971. “The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances.” Language 47 (1): 27–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garvey, Catherine. 1977. “The Contingent Query: A Dependent Act in Conversation.” In Interaction, Conversation, and the Development of Language, edited by M. Lewis and L.A. Rosenblum, 63–94. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar

  • Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath, and Sebastian Nordhoff. 2014. “Langdoc.” Glottolog 2.3. August. http://glottolog.org/. Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86 (3): 663–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie, eds. 2008. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Google Scholar

  • Hayashi, Makoto, and Kaoru Hayano. 2013. “Proffering Insertable Elements: A Study Of Other-Initiated Repair In Japanese.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, edited by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 293–321. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, eds. 2013. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Henrich, Joseph, Steven J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3): 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.” Language 56 (2): 251–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyman, Larry M. 2009. “How (not) to Do Phonological Typology: The Case of Pitch-Accent.” Language Sciences 31 (2-3): 213–38. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hymes, Dell. 1964. “Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication.” American Anthropologist, New Series, 66 (6): 1–34. Google Scholar

  • Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David N. Sudnow, 294–338. New York: MacMillan/The Free Press. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G.H. Lerner, 43–59. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of Subject.” In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles Li, 305–33. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  • Kendrick, Kobin H. under review. “The Intersection of Turn-Taking and Repair: The Timing of Other-Initiations of Repair in Conversation.” Frontiers in Language Sciences Google Scholar

  • Kendrick, Kobin H., Penelope Brown, Mark Dingemanse, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Kaoru Hayano, Elliott M. Hoey, Gertie Hoymann, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and Stephen C Levinson. 2014. “Sequence Organisation: A Universal Infrastructure for Action.” Talk presented at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis, University of California at Los Angeles, CA. Google Scholar

  • Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. “Other-Initiated Repair Sequences in Korean Conversation: Types and Functions.” Discourse and Cognition 6: 141–68. Google Scholar

  • Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. “Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–56. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google Scholar

  • Koshik, Irene. 2005. “Alternative Questions Used in Conversational Repair.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 193–211. doi:10.1177/1461445605050366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmann, Winfred P., ed. 1978. Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press. Google Scholar

  • Lerner, Gene H. 2004. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–84. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. “Monitoring and Self-Repair in Speech.” Cognition 14: 41–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. “On The Human ‘Interaction Engine.’” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Human Interaction, edited by Nick J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2007. “Optimizing Person Reference - Perspectives from Usage on Rossel Island.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, edited by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 29–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Li, Charles N., ed. 1976. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  • Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Univ of California Press. Google Scholar

  • Lüpke, Friederike. 2009. “Data Collection Methods for Field-Based Language Documentation.” Language Documentation and Description 6: 53–100. Google Scholar

  • Majid, Asifa. 2012. “A Guide to Stimulus-Based Elicitation for Semantic Categories.” In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 54–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Majid, Asifa, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “WEIRD Languages Have Misled Us Too.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Google Scholar

  • Moerman, Michael. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational Corpus.” Language 53 (4): 872–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moerman, Michael, and Harvey Sacks. 1988. “On ‘Understanding’ in the Analysis of Natural Conversation.” In Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis, by Michael Moerman, 180–86. University of Pennsylvania Publications in Conduct and Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar

  • Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Nisbett, Richard E., and Timothy D. Wilson. 1977. “Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes.” Psychological Review 84 (3): 231–59. Google Scholar

  • Obeng, Samuel Gyasi. 1992. “A Phonetic Description of Some Repair Sequences in Akan Conversation.” Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 12 (1): 59–80. doi:10.1515/text.1.1992.12.1.59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ochs, Elinor. 1984. “Clarification and Culture.” In GURT’84: Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, edited by Deborah Schiffrin. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar

  • Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David Wilkins, Stephen Levinson, Sotaro Kita, and Gunter Senft. 1998. “Semantic Typology and Spatial Conceptualization.” Language 74 (3): 557–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. “Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships During Conversational Repair.” Communication Monographs 73 (June): 137–61. doi:10.1080/03637750600581206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 2014. “What ‘What?’ Tells Us About How Conversationalists Manage Intersubjectivity.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 47 (2): 109–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. London: Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schachter, Paul. 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic or None of the Above?” In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles N. Li, 493–518. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. “Discourse as Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things That Come Between Sentences.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, edited by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar

  • ———. 1987. “Between Macro and Micro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch, and Neil J. Smelser, 207–34. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar

  • ———. 1992. “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” The American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. Google Scholar

  • ———. 1993. “Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 26 (1): 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 1997a. “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. doi:10.1080/01638539709545001. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 1997b. “Third Turn Repair.” In Towards a Social Science of Language. Volume 2: Social Interaction and Discourse Structures, edited by Gregory R. Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, and John Baugh, 31–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2000. “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 205–43. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 2004. “On Dispensability.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 37 (2): 95–149. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2005. “On Complainability.” Social Problems 52 (4): 449–76. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2006. “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in Which Culture Is Enacted.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Human Interaction, edited by Nick J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 70–96. Oxford: Berg. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Selting, Margret. 1996. “Prosody as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of so-Called ‘astonished’ Questions in Repair Initiation.” In Prosody in Conversation : Interactional Studies, edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 231–70. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36 (1): 229–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ———. 2009a. “Language-Specific Resources in Repair and Assessments.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 304–25. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • ———. , ed. 2009b. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Sidnell, Jack, and N. J. Enfield. 2012. “Language Diversity and Social Action.” Current Anthropology 53 (3): 302–33. doi:10.1086/665697. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The Limits of Awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Papers 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, C. Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, J. P. de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (26): 10587–92. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suzuki, Kana. 2010. “Other-Initiated Repair in Japanese: Accomplishing Mutual Understanding in Conversation.” PhD dissertation, Kobe: Kobe University. Google Scholar

  • Svennevig, Jan. 2008. “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiation of Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2): 333–48. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. SAGE. Google Scholar

  • Thompson, Sandra A., Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Barbara A. Fox. in press. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Ultan, Russell. 1978. “Some General Characteristics of Interrogative Systems.” In Universals of Human Language, 4:211–48. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 2006. “Initiating Repair and beyond: The Use of Two Repeat-Formatted Repair Initiations in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes 41 (1): 67–109. Google Scholar

  • ———. 2009. “Repetition in the Initiation of Repair.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 31–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Wei. 1999. “Repair in Chinese Conversation.” PhD dissertation, University of Hong Kong. Google Scholar

  • Zimmerman, Don H. 1999. “Horizontal and Vertical Comparative Research in Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 32 (1-2): 195–203. doi:10.1080/08351813.1999.9683623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-09-30

Accepted: 2014-11-24

Published Online: 2015-02-05


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0007.

Export Citation

© 2015 Mark Dingemanse, N. J. Enfield. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Tanya Stivers and Rebecca K. Barnes
Health Communication, 2017, Page 1
[2]
Barbara A. Fox, Fay Wouk, Steven Fincke, Wilfredo Hernandez Flores, Makoto Hayashi, Minna Laakso, Yael Maschler, Abolghasem Mehrabi, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Susanne Uhmann, and Hyun Jung Yang
Studies in Language, 2017, Volume 41, Number 3
[3]
Amelia Church, Louise Paatsch, and Dianne Toe
Discourse Studies, 2017, Volume 19, Number 1, Page 49
[4]
Mark Dingemanse, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, N. J. Enfield, and Sonja Kotz
PLOS ONE, 2015, Volume 10, Number 9, Page e0136100
[5]
Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Rasmus Persson
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2016, Volume 49, Number 2, Page 128
[6]
Elizabeth Manrique
Open Linguistics, 2016, Volume 2, Number 1
[7]
Simeon Floyd
Open Linguistics, 2015, Volume 1, Number 1
[8]
Elizabeth Manrique and N. J. Enfield
Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, Volume 6
[9]
Joe Blythe
Open Linguistics, 2015, Volume 1, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in