Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Metaphor Evaluation of Leadership Styles: A Case Study of Presidential New Year Greetings

Liudmila Arcimaviciene / Vida Jonaitiene
Published Online: 2015-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0006

Abstract

By using the analytical framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) and procedurally employing Pragglejaz Group’s Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), this study aims at evaluating metaphor use in the narrative of presidential New Year greetings of twelve political leaders. The evaluation of the identified 409 metaphoric clusters has demonstrated that different political leaders evoke two power skills within the ethical dimension: hard and soft. Furthermore, it has been clarified that hard power leadership is more varied at its three conceptual levels of semantic representation: pragmatic, intermediary and transactional. The clarified metaphoric utterances have revealed that female leaders are more democratic in their conceptualisation and linguistic preferences than their male counterparts, i.e. the male leaders tend to prioritise competitive forcefulness over cognitive empathy and community concerns, while the female leaders tend to emphasize the importance of a unified and compassionate approach to solving social and political problems.

Keywords: Critical metaphor analysis; leadership styles; political discourse

References

  • Cameron, Deborah. 2006. On Language and Sexual Politics. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2009. Metaphor and Political Communication. In: Musolff, Andreas, Jörg Zinken (eds.), Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97-115. Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar

  • Chilton, Paul. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar

  • Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group): London and New York. Google Scholar

  • Chilton, Paul. 2005. Manipulation, memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf. In: de Saussure, Louis, Peter Schulz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. John Benjamins: Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 5–45. Google Scholar

  • Chitlon, Paul, Christina Schäffner. 2011. Discourse and Politics.In: Van Dijk, Teun(ed.),Discourse Studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE, pp. 303-331. Google Scholar

  • Curtis, Natalie Hansen. 2009. Gender, Politics & Political Cartoons (Opinion article).http://teamboldandbeautiful.weebly.com/gender-women--femininity.html (accessed 04.08.11) Google Scholar

  • De Beauvoir, Simone. 1997. The Second Sex.Vintage: London. Google Scholar

  • Flack, Jessica, Frans De Wahl. 2002. Being nice is not a building block of morality. In: Katz, Leonard, D. (ed.), Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Imprint Academic, pp. 67-79. Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond, W. 1999. Researching metaphor. In: Cameron, Lynne, Graham Low (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29–47. Google Scholar

  • Grady, Joseph. 1999. A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In: Gibbs, Raymond, Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 79-100. Google Scholar

  • Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology.John Benjamin Publishing Company: Amsterdam/ Philadelphia. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Janda, Laura. A. 2000. Cognitive Linguistics.Available at http://www.indiana.edu/slavkonf/SLING2K/pospapers/janda.pdg.Accessed on March 25, 2013. Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Mark. 1993. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago University Press, Chicago and London. Google Scholar

  • Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: a Critical Cognitive Study. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Google Scholar

  • Koller, Veronika.2009. Missions and Empires: Religious and Political Metaphors in Corporate Discourse. In: Musolff, Andreas, Jörg Zinken (eds.), Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 116-135. Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltan. 2002. Metaphor: a Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltan. 2009. Metaphor, Culture, and Discourse: The Pressure of Coherence. In: Musolff, Andreas, Jörg Zinken (eds.), Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 11-25. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books: New York. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago &London: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 2006. Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. Macmillan. Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. 2011. The New Obama Narrative./http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-lakoff/the-new-obama-narrative_b_815326.htmlS (accessed 05.07.12). Google Scholar

  • Lazar, Michelle,Cheris Kramarae. 2011. Gender and Power in Discourse. In: van Dijk, Teun (ed.), Discourse Studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE, pp. 217-241. Google Scholar

  • Mey, Jacob. L. 2006. Metaphors and activity. Essays on Metaphor in Language and Thought, special edition of D.E.L.T.A 22, pp. 45–66. Google Scholar

  • Mussolf, Andreas. 2006. Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse. In Metaphor and Symbol 21 (1), pp. 23-38. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nerlich, Brigitte, Nelya Koteyko. 2009. MRSA – Portrait of a Superbug: A Media Drama in Three Acts. In: Musolff, Andreas, Jörg Zinken (eds.),Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153-173. Google Scholar

  • Nye, Joseph. S. 2008. The Powers to Lead. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  • Pragglejaz Group, 2007. MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1), pp. 1–39 (accessed 12.06.12). Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark. 2001. Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  • Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In: Stefanowitsch, Anatol, Stefan Thomas Gries (eds.), Trends in Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: DE GRUYTER, pp. 1-17. Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, Teun A. 2011. Discourse and Ideology. In: Van Dijk, Teun (ed.),Discourse Studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE, pp. 379-408. Google Scholar

  • Zinken, Jörg, Andreas Musolff. 2009. A Discourse-Centred Perspective on Metaphorical Meaning and Understanding.In: Musolff, Andreas, Jörg Zinken (eds.), Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-11. Google Scholar

  • Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, Language, and Discourse. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-10-16

Accepted: 2015-02-19

Published Online: 2015-04-01


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0006.

Export Citation

© 2015 Liudmila Arcimaviciene, Vida Jonaitiene. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in