Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year

Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Role of a Domain-specific Language Mechanism in Learning Natural and Unnatural Stress

Angela C. Carpenter
Published Online: 2016-03-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0006


In an artificial language-learning task, two groups of English and French participants learned one of two language rules: 1) stress the first heavy (CVC) syllable, else the first syllable, or, 2) stress the first light (CV) syllable, else the first syllable. French and English participants were chosen to compare learning outcomes by speakers of different native stress systems, fixed and variable. Participants were trained on the target language by listening to a set of nonsense familiarization words exemplifying the stress rule. This was followed by a forced-choice task to choose the correct version of the words they had just learned. Following the training procedure, participants were tested on novel words with the same stress pattern to which they were familiarized. The result of the novel word testing was that the natural rule with stress on heavy syllables was learned significantly better than the unnatural, stress light syllables, rule. To account for the learnability of both the natural and the unnatural rules, I argue for the interaction of a general cognitive mechanism that facilitates learning in general and a domain-specific language mechanism that can access universal phonological principles to aid in learning a natural language rule.

Keywords: phonology; stress; artificial language learning; domain-general; domain-specific; French stress 'deafness'


  • Ausubel, David P. (1965). The role of frequency in learning and retention: A cognitive structure interpretatioin. Journal of General Psychology, 72(2), 359-368. Google Scholar

  • Baer-Henney, Dinah, Kügler, Frank & van de Vijver, Ruben (2015). The interaction of language-specific and universal factors during the acquisition of morphophonemic alternations with exceptions. Cognitive Science, 39, 1537-1569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, Michael, Nevins, Andrew & Levine, Jonathan (2012). Asymmetries in generalizing alternations to and from initial syllables. Language, 88(2), 231-268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berent, Iris, Steriade, Donca, Lennertz, Tracy & Vaknin, Vered (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition, 104(3), 591-630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Buss, David M., Haselton, Martie G., Shackelford, Todd, Bleske, April L., & Wakefield, Jerome C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533-548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan (2002). Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givon & B. F. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 109-134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711-733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carpenter, Angela (2010). A naturalness bias in learning stress. Phonology, 27, 345-392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carpenter, Angela (2015). Phonetic training significantly mitigates the stress ‘deafness’ of French speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(3), 94-108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carpenter, Angela (Submitted). Learning natural and unnatural phonological stress by 9- and10-year-olds: A preliminary report. Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam (1972). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam, & Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar

  • Christiansen, Morten & Chater, Nick (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489-509. Google Scholar

  • Cole, Ronald A. & Scott, Brian (1974). The phantom in the phoneme: Invariant cues for stop consonants. Perception & Psychophysics, 15(1), 101-107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comins, Jordan A. & Gentner, Timothy (2013). Perceptual categories enable pattern generalization in songbirds. Cognition, 128, 113-118. Google Scholar

  • Culbertson, Jennifer (2012). Typological universals as reflections of biased learning: Evidence from artificial language learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(5), 310-329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Graaff, Rick (1997). The Experanton experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-276. Google Scholar

  • de la Moro, Daniela & Toro, Juan M. (2014). Discrimination of acoustic patterns in rats using theater T-maze. Psicológica, 35, 195-208. Google Scholar

  • DeLattre, Pierre (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4(3), 183-198. Google Scholar

  • Dupoux, Emmanuel, Pallier, Christophe, Sebastián-Gallés, Nuria & Mehler, Jacques (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406-421. Google Scholar

  • Edwards, Jette G. H., & Zampini, Mary (2008). Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Ellis, Nick & Collins, Laura (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency form, and function - Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 329-335. Google Scholar

  • Finley, Sara (2011). The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 74-83. Google Scholar

  • Finley, Sara & Badecker, William (2010). Linguistic and non-linguistic influences on learning biases for vowel harmony. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. Google Scholar

  • Fry, Dennis (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA, 27, 765-768. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fry, Dennis (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 126-152. Google Scholar

  • Goad, Heather & White, Lydia (2008). Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua, 118(4), 577-594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gordon, Matthew (1999). Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology and Typology. (Ph.D.), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles. Google Scholar

  • Gordon, Matthew (2002). A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight [March 2002]. Language, 78, 51-80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gordon, Matthew (2004). Syllable Weight. In B. Hayes, D. Steriade, & R. Kirchner (Eds.), Phonetically-based Phonology. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Steven, Carvey, Hannah & Hitchcock, Leah (2002). The relations between stress accent and pronunciation variation in spontaneous American English discourse. Paper presented at the ISCA Workshop on Prosody and Speech Processing. Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Steven, Chang, Shawn & Hitchcock, Leah (2001). The relation between stress accent and vocalic identity in spontaneous American English discourse. Paper presented at the Prosody and Speech Recognition 2001, Red Bank, NJ. Google Scholar

  • Hammond, Michael (1999). The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality-Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Hancin-Bhatt, Barbara (2008). Second-language phonology in optimality theory. In J. G. H. Edward & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 117-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Harris, Katherine (1958). Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech, 1(1), 1-7. Google Scholar

  • Hayes, Bruce (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguitic Inquiry, 13, 227-276. Google Scholar

  • Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical Stress Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

  • Hayes, Bruce, Zuraw, Kie, Siptár, Peter & Londe, Zsuzsa (2009). Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language, 85(4), 822-863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hemera Technologies (2001). Big Box of Art 350,000: Hemera Technologies, Inc. Google Scholar

  • Hyman, Larry M. (1985/2003). A theory of phonological weight. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar

  • Jassem, Wiktor, Morton, John, & Steffen-Batog, Maria (1968). The perception of stress in synthetic speech-like stimuli by Polish listeners. In W. Jassem (Ed.), Speech Analysis and Synthesis (pp. 289-308). Warsaw: Institute of Fundamental Technical Research. Google Scholar

  • Kapatsinski, Vsevolod (2013). Conspiring to mean: Experimental and computational evidence for a usage-based harmonic approach to morphophonology. Language, 89(1), 110-148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawahara, Shigeto (2008). Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, 317-330. Google Scholar

  • Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208-1221. Google Scholar

  • Lewicki, Pawel, Czyzewska, Maria & Hoffman, Hunter (1987). Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 523-530. Google Scholar

  • Maye, Jessica, Werker, Janet & Gerken, LouAnn (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101-B111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarthy, John (1979). On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(3), 443-465. Google Scholar

  • Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology, 25, 83-127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moreton, Elliott (2009). Underphonologization and modularity bias. In S. Parker (Ed.), Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation (pp. 79-101). Bristol: Equinox Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar

  • Moreton, Elliott & Pater, Joe (2012a). Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 686-701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moreton, Elliott & Pater, Joe (2012b). Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part II: Substance. Language and Linguistic Compass, 6, 702-718. Google Scholar

  • O’Shaughnessy, Douglas (1984). A multispeaker analysis of durations in read French paragraphs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(6), 1664-1672. Google Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. (1994). Towards a universal, phonetically-based, theory of vowel harmony. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94), Yokohama, Japan. Google Scholar

  • Pater, Joe (1997). Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In S. J. Hannahs and M. Young-Scholten (Eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Pater, Joe (2000). Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology, 17(2), 237-274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pater, Joe & Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2005). Phonotactics and alternations: Testing the connection with artificial language learning. In K. F. a. S. Kawahara (Ed.), UMOP 31: Papers in Experimental Phonetics and Phonology. Amherst, MA: GLSA. Google Scholar

  • Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ Laboratory Phonology (2002 ed., Vol. 7, pp. 203-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • Peperkamp, Sharon, Dupoux, Emmanuel & Sebastián-Gallés, Nuria (1999). Perception of stress by French, Spanish and bilingual subjects. Paper presented at the EuroSpeech ‘99. Google Scholar

  • Pinker, Steven (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow and Company. Google Scholar

  • Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993/2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Malden, Mass & Oxford. Google Scholar

  • Roberts, John R. (1987). Amele. London: Croom Helm. Google Scholar

  • Romberg, Alexa & Saffran, Jenny R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev Cogn Sci, 1(6), 906-914. Google Scholar

  • Saffran, Jenny R. (2003). Statistical Language Learning: Mechanisms and Constraints. Current Directioins in Psychological Science, 12(4), 110-114. Google Scholar

  • Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N., & Newport, Elissa L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928. Google Scholar

  • Sapir, Edward & Swadesh, Morris (1960). Yana Dictionary (Vol. 22). Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar

  • Sluijter, Agaath M. C., & van Heuven, Vincent J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4), 2471-2485. Google Scholar

  • Stadler, Michael (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1061-1069. Google Scholar

  • Stampe, David (1973). A Book on Natural Phonology. (Doctoral Book), University of Chicago. Google Scholar

  • ten Cate, Carel & Okanoya, Azuo (2012). Revisiting the syntactic abilities of nonhuman animals: Natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Science, 367, 1984-1994. Google Scholar

  • White, Lydia (1990). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(2), 121-133. Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Colin (2003). Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. Paper presented at the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science, 30, 945-982. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Jie & Lai, Yuwen (2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology, 27, 153-201 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-06-30

Accepted: 2016-01-02

Published Online: 2016-03-23

Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0006.

Export Citation

© 2016 Angela C. Carpenter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in