Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

‘Almost people’: A Learner Corpus Account of L2 Use and Misuse of Non-numerical Quantification

Peter Crosthwaite / Lavigne L.Y. Choy / Yeonsuk Bae
Published Online: 2016-08-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0015

Abstract

We present an Integrated Contrastive Model of non-numerical quantificational NPs (NNQs, i.e. ‘some people’) produced by L1 English speakers and Mandarin and Korean L2 English learners. Learner corpus data was sourced from the ICNALE (Ishikawa, 2011, 2013) across four L2 proficiency levels. An average 10% of L2 NNQs were specific to L2 varieties, including noun number mismatches (*‘many child’), omitting obligatory quantifiers after adverbs (*‘almost people’), adding unnecessary particles (*‘all of people’) and non-L1 English-like quantifier/noun agreement (*‘many water’). Significantly fewer ‘openclass’ NNQs (e.g a number of people) are produced by L2 learners, preferring ‘closed-class’ single lexical quantifiers (following L1-like use). While such production is predictable via L1 transfer, Korean L2 English learners produced significantly more L2-like NNQs at each proficiency level, which was not entirely predictable under a transfer account. We thus consider whether positive transfer of other linguistic forms (i.e. definiteness marking) aids the learnability of other L2 forms (i.e. expression of quantification).

Keywords: Contrastive interlanguage analysis; learner corpora; second language acquisition; nonnumerical quantification; Mandarin; Korean

References

  • Bickerton, Derek. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma Press. Google Scholar

  • Bley-Vroman, Robert. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Susan Gass & Jacquelyn Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Channell, Joanna. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • Clahsen, Harald, & Felser, Claudia. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chuang, Fei-Yu, & Nesi, Hilary. (2006). An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students. Corpora, 1(2), 251-271. Google Scholar

  • Council of Europe, (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Crosthwaite, Peter. (2013). An error analysis of L2 English discourse reference through learner corpora analysis. Linguistic Research, 30(2), 163-193. Google Scholar

  • Crosthwaite, Peter. (2014a). Differences between the coherence of Mandarin and Korean L2 English learner production and English native speakers: An empirical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge. Google Scholar

  • Crosthwaite, Peter. (2014b). Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2: A study of bridging in Mandarin, Korean and English. Language Learning, 64 (3), 456-492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crosthwaite, Peter. (2016a). L2 English Article Use by L1 Speakers of article-less Languages: A Learner Corpus Study. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(1), 68-100. Google Scholar

  • Crosthwaite, Peter. (2016b). Definite article bridging relations in L2: A learner corpus study. Submitted to Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, available online ahead of print, DOI: 10.1515/cllt-2015-0058 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crosthwaite, Peter, & Choy, Lavigne, (2016) A Learner Corpus investigation of Filipino L2 English article use: The way forward for language teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 93, 4-23. Google Scholar

  • Cummins, Christopher & Katsos, Napoleon (2013). Empirical and theoretical evidence for a model of quantifier production. In Frank Liedtke & Corniela Schulze (eds.) Beyond words: Content, Context and Inference (pp.253-282). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • Cummins, Christopher, Sauerland, Uli, & Solt, Stephanie. (2012). Granularity and scalar implicature in numerical expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 35(2), 135-169. Google Scholar

  • Davies, Catherine, & Katsos, Napoleon (2010). Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua, 120(8), 1956-1972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DelliCarpini, Margo. (2003). Developmental stages in the semantic acquisition of quantification by adult L2 learners of English: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 55-63). Google Scholar

  • Diez-Bedmar, Maria-Belen (2015). Article use and criterial features in Spanish EFL writing. In Marcus Callies & Sandra Gotz (eds.) Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment (pp.163-190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Diez-Bedmar, Maria-Belen & Papp, Szilvia. (2008). The use of the English article system by Chinese and Spanish learners. In Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Maria-Belen Diez-Bedmar, & Szilvia Papp (Eds.), Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research (pp.147-175). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  • Drave, Neil. (2002). Vaguely speaking: A corpus approach to vague language in intercultural conversations. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.) New Frontiers of Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 21st International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (pp.25-40). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar

  • Filipović, Luna, & Hawkins, John. (2013). Multiple factors in second language acquisition: The CASP model. Linguistics, 51(1), 145–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleiss, Joseph. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd Edition. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar

  • Gil, Kook-Hee, & Marsden, Heather. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 3(2), 117-149. Google Scholar

  • Granger, Sylviane. (1996), From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora, in Karen Aijmer, Bengt Altenberg, and Mats Johansson (eds), Languages in contrast (pp.37-51), Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press. Google Scholar

  • Granger, Sylviane. (2015). Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1:1 (2015), 7–24. doi 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Granger, Sylviane & Meunier, Fanny. (1994). New insights into the learner lexicon: a preliminary report from the international corpus of learner English. In Lynne Flowerdew & Anthony K. K. Tong (eds.) Entering Text (pp.102-113). Hong Kong: Language Centre, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Google Scholar

  • Huang, Yan. (2000). Anaphora: A Cross-Linguistic Study. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, USA. Google Scholar

  • Ishikawa, Shin’Ichiro. (2011). A New horizon in learner corpus studies: The aim of the ICNALE Project. In G. Weir, S. Ishikawa, & K. Poonpon (Eds.), Corpora and language technologies in teaching, learning and research (pp.3-11). Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde Press. Google Scholar

  • Ishikawa, Shin’Ichiro. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. In Ishikawa, S. (ed.), Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World, 191-118. Google Scholar

  • Klein, Woflgang, & Perdue, Clive. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301–347. Google Scholar

  • Kuno, Susumo, Takami, Ken-ichi, & Wu, Yuru. (1999). Quantifier scope in English, Chinese, and Japanese. Language, 63-111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, Sunyoung. (2009). Interpreting Scope Ambiguity in First and Second Language Processing: Universal Quantifiers and Negation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii. Google Scholar

  • Lee, Thomas, Yip, Virginia, & Wang, Chuming (1999). Inverse scope in Chinese-English interlanguage. Lingua Posnaniensis, 41, 39-56. Google Scholar

  • Li, Xuping & Bisang, Walter (2012). Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking, Lingua, 122 (4):335-355. Google Scholar

  • Matthews, Stephen, & Yip, Virginia (2013). The emergence of quantifier scope. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(3), 324-329. Google Scholar

  • Milton, John (2001). Elements of a Written Interlanguage: A Computational and Corpus-based Study of Institutional Influences on the Acquisition of English by Hong Kong Chinese Students. Research Reports, Vol. 2, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Google Scholar

  • Nation, Paul, & Beglar, David (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13. Google Scholar

  • Nicholls, Diane. (2003). The Cambridge Learner Corpus - error coding and analysis for lexicography and ELT. In David Archer, Paul Rayson, & Tony McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference. UCREL: Lancaster University. Google Scholar

  • O’Donnell, Michael (2008). Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume), pages 13–16, Columbus, June 2008. Google Scholar

  • Papp, Szilvia. (2004). The use of learner and reference corpora to foster inductive learning and self-correction in Chinese learners of English, Conference paper. Meeting the Needs of the Chinese Learner in Higher Education Conference, 17-18 July 2004. Google Scholar

  • Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. Google Scholar

  • Robertson, Daniel. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135-172. Google Scholar

  • Selinker, Larry. (1972), Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–241. Google Scholar

  • Slabakova, Roumanya. (2010). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120(10), 2444-2462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, Adam (2009). Non-numerical quantifiers. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.) Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond (pp.159-183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

  • Socher, Richard, Bauer, John, Manning, Christopher, & Ng, Andrew (2013). Parsing with compositional vector grammars. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACL conference. Google Scholar

  • Sorace, Antonella. (2011). Pinning down the concept of interface in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. Google Scholar

  • Sorace, Antonella., & Filiaci, Francesca. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. Google Scholar

  • Von Stutterheim, Christiane, & Klein, Wolfgang (1989). Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language Processing in Social Context (pp. 39–76). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar

  • Xiao, Richard & McEnery, Tony (2010). Corpus-based contrastive studies of English and Chinese. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • Wiese, Heike. (2003). Numbers, Language and the Human Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Hong. (2007). Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 16: 43–59. doi:10.1007/s10831-006-9006-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-01-20

Accepted: 2016-08-01

Published Online: 2016-08-31


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0015.

Export Citation

© 2016 Peter Crosthwaite et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in