Bamberg, Michael & Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. Small stories as new perspective in narrative and identity analysis.
Text and Talk 28(3). 377-396.Google Scholar
Bruthiaux Paul. 1994. Me Tarzan, you Jane: Linguistic simplification in ‘personal ads’ register. In Biber D., Finegan E., eds.
Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, 136–154. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland Justine. 1996. Dating advertisements: Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse & Society 7. 187–207.Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2016. Self-disclosure online. Pragmatic repertoire of a microblogging community (Pragmatics & Beyond 260).
Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small stories, interaction and identities (Studies in Narrative 8). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jennifer L., Ellison, Nicole B. & Rebecca D. Heino. 2006. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated
future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived successes in internet dating. Journal of Communication Research 33(2).
152–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giltrow, Janet & Dieter Stein. 2009. Genres in the internet. Innovation, evolution and genre theory. In Giltrow, Janet & Dieter
Stein (eds.), Genres in the internet, 1-25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behaviour in Public Places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hardey, Michael. 2002. Life beyond the screen: embodiment and identity through the internet. The Sociological Review 50(4).
570-585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, Emily. 2016. ‘U R dumped!’ Women say bad spelling and grammar are the biggest turn off when looking for love
online. Mailonline, 15 October 2015. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3262219/Bad-spelling-grammar-biggestturn-
women-using-online-dating-sites.html (accessed 19 March 2016).Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm, ed. Essays on the
verbal and visual arts, 12-44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kaupp, Peter. 1968. Das Heiratsinserat im Sozialen Wandel. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
Marley, Carol. 2000. Beyond the usual: the modification of gender in a British dating ads column. Text 20(3). 137-154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marley, Carol. 2002. Popping the question: questions and modality in written dating advertisements. Discourse Studies 4(1).
75-98.Google Scholar
Marley, Carol. 2010. Interpersonal issues in the discourse of dating ads. In: Locher, Miriam and Sage L. Graham (eds.),
Interpersonal Pragmatics, 435-462. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
National Crime Agency (2016) http://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/publications/670-emerging-new-threat-in-onlinedating-
initial-trends-in-internet-dating-initiated-serious-sexual-assaults/file (accessed 20 March 2016).Google Scholar
Ochs, Eleanor & Lisa Capps. 2001. Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pandey Anita. 2004. Culture, gender and identity in cross-cultural personals and matrimonials. World Englishes 23(3).
403–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, Srilakshmi. 2010. ‘Wheatish’ grooms and ‘innocent’ divorcées: commodifying attributes in the discourse of
Indian Matrimonials. Discourse & Society 23(4): 432-449.Google Scholar
Rose, David (ed.). 2006. They call me naughty Lola: Personal ads from the London Review of Books. London: Scribner.Google Scholar
Rose, David (ed.). 2010. Sexually, I’m more of a Switzerland: More personal ads from the London Review of Books. London:
Scribner.Google Scholar
Shalom, Celia. 1997. That great supermarket of desire: attributes to the desired other in personal advertisements. In Harvey,
Keith & Celia Shalom (eds.), Language and desire: Encoding sex, romance and intimacy, 186-203. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smaill, Belinda. 2004. Online personals and narratives of the self: Australia’s RSVP. Convergence: The Journal of Research into
New Media Technologies 10(1). 93-107.Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron & Monica Anderson. 2016. 5 facts about online dating. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/29/5-
facts-about-online-dating/, February 29, 2016, accessed March 19, 2016.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2010. Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Cloutier, Robert et al. (eds.) Studies in the
history of the English language V. Variation and change in English grammar and lexicon, 11-27. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yelvington, Kevin. 1996. Flirting in the factory. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(2). 313-333.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comments (0)