Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“More about me” – Self-Presentation and Narrative Strategies in Caribbean Online Dating Ads

Susanne Mühleisen
Published Online: 2016-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0023

Abstract

This paper focuses on self-presentation in dating ads and the strategies advertisers employ to construct their persona to attract and initiate responses from the desired other. Dating ads have experienced considerable structural changes in their transition from print media to online forms. The use of diverse media and interaction forms as well as extended space has resulted in a diversification of possibilities in online partner search in which advertisers use fragmented stories, past and anticipated narratives in order to construct a basic personal narrative. It is argued here that the act of posting the dating ads also functions as part of the advertisers’ life story with the projected end of finding romance or fulfilling other relational goals. The analysis of examples from a corpus of Caribbean dating ads also shows how advertisers make use of particular cultural references, lexical items and spelling adaptations in their creation of an authentic Caribbean persona and as a means to establish common ground with a potential partner.

Keywords: dating ads; small stories; Caribbean creoles

References

  • Bamberg, Michael & Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. Small stories as new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk 28(3). 377-396.Google Scholar

  • Bruthiaux Paul. 1994. Me Tarzan, you Jane: Linguistic simplification in ‘personal ads’ register. In Biber D., Finegan E., eds. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, 136–154. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Coupland Justine. 1996. Dating advertisements: Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse & Society 7. 187–207.Google Scholar

  • Dayter, Daria. 2016. Self-disclosure online. Pragmatic repertoire of a microblogging community (Pragmatics & Beyond 260). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small stories, interaction and identities (Studies in Narrative 8). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Jennifer L., Ellison, Nicole B. & Rebecca D. Heino. 2006. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived successes in internet dating. Journal of Communication Research 33(2). 152–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giltrow, Janet & Dieter Stein. 2009. Genres in the internet. Innovation, evolution and genre theory. In Giltrow, Janet & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the internet, 1-25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behaviour in Public Places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Hardey, Michael. 2002. Life beyond the screen: embodiment and identity through the internet. The Sociological Review 50(4). 570-585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodgkin, Emily. 2016. ‘U R dumped!’ Women say bad spelling and grammar are the biggest turn off when looking for love online. Mailonline, 15 October 2015. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3262219/Bad-spelling-grammar-biggestturn- women-using-online-dating-sites.html (accessed 19 March 2016).Google Scholar

  • Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm, ed. Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12-44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaupp, Peter. 1968. Das Heiratsinserat im Sozialen Wandel. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Marley, Carol. 2000. Beyond the usual: the modification of gender in a British dating ads column. Text 20(3). 137-154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marley, Carol. 2002. Popping the question: questions and modality in written dating advertisements. Discourse Studies 4(1). 75-98.Google Scholar

  • Marley, Carol. 2010. Interpersonal issues in the discourse of dating ads. In: Locher, Miriam and Sage L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics, 435-462. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • National Crime Agency (2016) http://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/publications/670-emerging-new-threat-in-onlinedating- initial-trends-in-internet-dating-initiated-serious-sexual-assaults/file (accessed 20 March 2016).Google Scholar

  • Ochs, Eleanor & Lisa Capps. 2001. Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pandey Anita. 2004. Culture, gender and identity in cross-cultural personals and matrimonials. World Englishes 23(3). 403–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramakrishnan, Srilakshmi. 2010. ‘Wheatish’ grooms and ‘innocent’ divorcées: commodifying attributes in the discourse of Indian Matrimonials. Discourse & Society 23(4): 432-449.Google Scholar

  • Rose, David (ed.). 2006. They call me naughty Lola: Personal ads from the London Review of Books. London: Scribner.Google Scholar

  • Rose, David (ed.). 2010. Sexually, I’m more of a Switzerland: More personal ads from the London Review of Books. London: Scribner.Google Scholar

  • Shalom, Celia. 1997. That great supermarket of desire: attributes to the desired other in personal advertisements. In Harvey, Keith & Celia Shalom (eds.), Language and desire: Encoding sex, romance and intimacy, 186-203. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Smaill, Belinda. 2004. Online personals and narratives of the self: Australia’s RSVP. Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 10(1). 93-107.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Aaron & Monica Anderson. 2016. 5 facts about online dating. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/29/5- facts-about-online-dating/, February 29, 2016, accessed March 19, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Traugott, Elizabeth. 2010. Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Cloutier, Robert et al. (eds.) Studies in the history of the English language V. Variation and change in English grammar and lexicon, 11-27. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Yelvington, Kevin. 1996. Flirting in the factory. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(2). 313-333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-04-04

Accepted: 2016-08-17

Published Online: 2016-10-28


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0023.

Export Citation

© 2016 Susanne Mühleisen. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in