Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Washo Onsets and the Revised Sonority Theory

Peter Staroverov
  • Wayne State University, Department of English, 5057 Woodward Ave, Ste 10303.3, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-11-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0025

Abstract

This article presents an argument for the idea that consonants of high sonority are preferred over low-sonority consonants between vowels (Uffmann 2007). The argument is based on a detailed description and analysis of the phonological patterns which ensure that a syllable starts with a consonant in Washo. Washo inserts [j], which is of high sonority, between any two vowels. Word-initially however a glottal stop is inserted. It is argued that the Washo insertion patterns show influence of the sonority requirements, and these patterns are not subject to an analysis in terms of autosegmental spreading. Thus although feature spreading is a useful tool for capturing similarity requirements on neighboring segments, it is not sufficient to account for cases like Washo epenthesis.

Keywords: phonology; Washo; consonant insertion; glide; glottal stop; autosegmental spreading; floating features; sonority; optimality theory

References

  • Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1996. Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics 32(2). 239–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beckman, Jill. 1998. Positional Faithfulness. PhD dissertation, Umass Amherst. Google Scholar

  • Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2012. The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The phonology and morphology of exponence, 8–83. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar

  • Blevins, Juliette. 2008. Consonant epenthesis: natural and unnatural histories. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Change, 79–107. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar

  • Bochnak, M. Ryan & Alice Rhomieux. 2013. Limited Noun Incorporation in Washo. International Journal of American Linguistics 79(2). 253–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Broselow, Ellen & John J. McCarthy. 1983. A theory of internal reduplication. The Linguistic Review 3. 25–88. Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic. 1997. Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: which vowel goes? Language 73(3). 493–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic. 1998. Resolving Hiatus. New York: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic. 2011. Hiatus resolution. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. 1. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar

  • Clements, George N. & Elizabeth Hume. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In John Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Clements, George N. & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Google Scholar

  • Cohn, Abigail C. 1990. Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Google Scholar

  • Cohn, Abigail C. 1993. The status of nasalized continuants. In Rena A. Krakow & Marie K. Huffman (eds.), Nasals, nasalization, and the velum, 329–367. Orlando: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Lisa & Daniel Erker. 2014. Hiatus resolution in American English: the case against glide insertion. Language 90. 482–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Haas, Wim. 1988. A Formal Theory of Vowel Coalescence: a case study of Ancient Greek. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar

  • de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The Formal Expression of Markedness. PhD dissertation, Umass Amherst. Google Scholar

  • de Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar

  • de Lacy, Paul & John Kingston. 2013. Synchronic explanation. NLLT 31(2). 287–355. Google Scholar

  • Dell, Francois & Mohamed Elmedlaoui. 1985. Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7. 105–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garellek, Marc. 2013. Production and perception of glottal stops. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Google Scholar

  • Hall, Tracy Alan. 2013. How common is r-Epenthesis? Folia Linguistica 47(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, James & Ellen M. Kaisse. 1999. Palatal vowels, glides, and obstruents in Argentinian Spanish. Phonology 16. 117–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 253–306. Google Scholar

  • Howe, Darin & Douglas Pulleyblank. 2004. Harmonic scales as faithfulness. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 49(1). 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hume, Elizabeth. 1995. Representing the duality of glides. In George Tsoulas & Lea Nash (eds.), Actes du congrès: Langues et grammaire. Paris: Université, Paris VIII. Google Scholar

  • Hume, Elizabeth & Georgios Tserdanelis. 2004. Labial unmarkedness in Sri Lankan Portuguese Creole. Phonology 19. 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyman, Larry M. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar

  • Iosad, Pavel. 2016. Prosodic structure and suprasegmental features: Short-vowel stød in Danish. To appear, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics. Google Scholar

  • Jacobsen, William H. 1964. A grammar of the Washo language. PhD dissertation, UC Berkeley. Google Scholar

  • Jacobsen, William H. 1980. Washo bipartite verb stems. In K. Klar, M. Langdon & S. Silver (eds.), American Indian and Indo-European studies. Papers in honor of Madison S. Beeler, 85–99. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar

  • Jacobsen, William H. 1996. Beginning Washo. Carson, NV: Nevada State Museum. Google Scholar

  • Jessen, Michael & Catherine Ringen. 2002. Laryngeal features in German. Phonology 19(2). 189–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawahara, Shigeto. 2003. On a certain kind of hiatus resolution in Japanese. Onin Kenkuyu 6. 11–20. Google Scholar

  • Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 291–306. Google Scholar

  • Köhnlein, Björn. 2011. Rule reversal revisited: synchrony and diachrony of tone and prosodic structure in the Franconian dialect of Arzbach. PhD dissertation, Leiden University. Google Scholar

  • Köhnlein, Björn. 2016. Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone accent systems. Phonology, to appear. Google Scholar

  • Kroeber, A. L. 1907. The Washo language of East Central California and Nevada. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 4. 251–317. Google Scholar

  • Levi, Susannah V. 2004. The representation of underlying glides: a cross-linguistic study. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington. Google Scholar

  • Levi, Susannah V. 2008. Phonemic vs. derived glides. Lingua 118(12). 1956–1978. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levin, Juliette. 1985. A metrical theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar

  • Lloret, Maria-Rosa. 1995. The representation of glottals in Oromo. Phonology 12(2). 257–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lombardi, Linda. 1999. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in optimality theory. NLLT 17. 267–302. Google Scholar

  • Lombardi, Linda. 2002. Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology 19(2). 219–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. 2002. A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge, New York: CUP. Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. 2007. Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox. Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. 2008. The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25(2). 271–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1994. The Emergence of the Unmarked: Optimality in Prosodic Morphology. Ms, UMass Amherst and Rutgers University. Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. Ms, UMass Amherst and Rutgers University. Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in Prosodic Morphology. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar

  • Midtlyng, Patrick. 2005. Washo morphophonology: hiatus resolution at the edges or let them be vowels. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. 16, 50–63. Google Scholar

  • Miller, Brett. 2012. Sonority and the larynx. In Stephen Parker (ed.), The sonority controversy, 257–288. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • Morén, Bruce. 2001. Distinctiveness, coercion and sonority: a unified theory of weight. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • Morley, Rebecca. 2015. Deletion or epenthesis? On the falsifiability of phonological universals. Lingua 154. 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naderi, Navid & Marc van Oostendorp. 2011. Reducing the number of Farsi epenthetic consonants. In Agnes Korn, Geoffrey Haig, Simin Karimi & Pollet Samvelian (eds.), Topics in Iranian Linguistics, 153–166. Weisbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag. Google Scholar

  • Nevins, Andrew & Ioana Chitoran. 2008. Phonological representations and the variable patterning of glides. Lingua 118. 1979–1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. 1990. Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. Papers from the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 319–338. Google Scholar

  • Ola Orie, Olanike & Victoria R. Bricker. 2000. Placeless and historical laryngeals in Yucatec Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 66(3). 283–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Padgett, Jaye. 2008. Glides, vowels, and features. Lingua 118. 1937–1955. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, Stephen. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Umass Amherst. Google Scholar

  • Parker, Stephen. 2011. Sonority. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Parker, Stephen (ed.). 2012. The Sonority Controversy. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar

  • Pater, Joe. 2012. Serial Harmonic Grammar and Berber syllabification. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya & Mariko Sugahara (eds.), Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth O. Selkirk, 43–72. London: Equinox. Google Scholar

  • Prince, Alan. 1990. Quantitative consequences of Rhythmic Organization. Parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology, 355–396. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Google Scholar

  • Prince, Alan. 2002. Arguing optimality. In Andries Coetzee, Angela Carpenter & Paul de Lacy (eds.), UMOP 26. Papers in Optimality Theory II. Amherst, Mass: GLSA. Google Scholar

  • Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, Mass: Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Rice, Keren D. 1992. On deriving sonority: a structural account of sonority relationships. Phonology 9(1). 61–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rose, Sharon. 1996. Variable laryngeals and vowel lowering. Phonology 13(1). 73–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenthall, Samuel. 1997. Vowel/Glide Alternation in a Theory of Constraint Interaction. Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar

  • Rubach, Jerzy. 2000. Glide and Glottal Stop Insertion in Slavic Languages: A DOT Analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 271–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubach, Jerzy. 2002. Against subsegmental glides. Linguistic Inquiry 33(4). 672–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Staroverov, Peter. 2014. Splitting theory and consonant epenthesis. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University. Google Scholar

  • Stemberger, Joseph Paul. 1993. Glottal transparency. Phonology 10(1). 107–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trommer, Jochen. 2011. Phonological aspects of Western Nilotic mutation morphology. Habilitation thesis, University of Leipzig. Google Scholar

  • Uffmann, Christian. 2007. Intrusive [r] and optimal epenthetic consonants. Language Sciences 29(2–3). 451–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Urbanczyk, Suzanne. 1993. Infixing and moraic circumscription. In Tim Sherer (ed.), UMOP 16. Phonological Representations, 319–357. Amherst, Mass: GLSA. Google Scholar

  • Waksler, Rachelle. 1990. A formal account of glide/vowel alternation in prosodic theory. PhD dissertation, Harvard University. Google Scholar

  • Westbury, John R. & Patricia A. Keating. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22(1). 145–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winter, Werner. 1970. Reduplication in Washo: A Restatement. International Journal of American Linguistics 36(3). 190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2005a. Quantity, stress and reduplication in Washo. Phonology 22(3). 437–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2005b. Prosodically-governed segmental fission in Washo. Proceedings of BLS 31. University of California. Google Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2008a. Two patterns of reduplication in Washo. Proceedings of BLS 34. University of California. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2008b. The phonetics of quantity alternation in Washo. Journal of Phonetics 36(3). 508–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2011. Laryngeal phonology in Washo. Ms, University of Chicago. Google Scholar

  • Yu, Alan C. L. 2016. Laryngeal schizophrenia in Washo resonants. In Eugene Buckley, Thera Crane & Jeff Good (eds.), Revealing structure: Finding patterns in grammars and using grammatical patterns to elucidate language, A festschrift to honor Larry M. Hyman. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar

  • Zec, Draga. 1995. Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology 12(1). 85–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-05-18

Accepted: 2016-09-07

Published Online: 2016-11-18


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0025.

Export Citation

© 2016 Peter Staroverov. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in