Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Tocharian and Historical Sociolinguistics: Evidence from a Fragmentary Corpus

Melanie Malzahn
Published Online: 2017-06-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0009

Abstract

The two extinct languages Tocharian A and Tocharian B comprise a small text corpus that consists almost exclusively of fragments. Nevertheless, the corpus shows linguistic variation. This paper will argue that there are three reasons for genuine linguistic variation in the Tocharian corpus: diachronic variation, dialectal variation and sociolectal variation. Accordingly, it is not only possible to apply sociolinguistic methods to a fragmentary corpus, but it is even essential. Furthermore, the Tocharian material confirms patterns of sound change known from other sources and can therefore offer insights for the principles of language change.

Keywords : Historical sociolinguistics; Tocharian; Sound change

References

  • Bybee, Joan L. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar

  • Dressler, Wolfgang. 1980. Was erwarten Phonologie-Theorien von der Indogermanistik - was kann die Indogermanistik bieten? (What do phonological theories expect of Comparative Philology-and what does Comparative Philology have to offer?). In Mayrhofer, Manfred (ed.), Lautgeschichte und Etymologie. Wiesbaden: Reichert, pp. 102-119.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Malzahn, Melanie. 2007. The most Archaic Manuscripts of Tocharian B and the Varieties of the Tocharian B Language. InGoogle Scholar

  • Malzahn, Melanie (ed.), Instrumenta Tocharica. Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 255-297.Google Scholar

  • Peyrot, Michaël. 2008. Variation and change in Tocharian B. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Peyrot, Michaël. 2010. Notes on the Buddhastotra fragment THT3597 in Tocharian B. Studies on the Inner Asian languages 25, pp. 143-169.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Betty. 2006. Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pinault, Georges-Jean. 1987. Épigraphie koutchéenne. I. Laissez-passer de caravanes. II. Graffites et inscriptions (Tocharian epigraphic. I. Carvan travel passports. II. Graffiti and inscription). In Sites divers de la région de Koutcha. Paris: Collège de France, pp. 59-196, plates pp. XL-XCVI.Google Scholar

  • Sander, Lore. 1968. Paläographisches zu den Sanskrithandschriften der Berliner Turfansammlung (Paleographical survey of the Sanskrit manuscripts). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

  • Sander, Lore. 2013. Was kann die Paläographie zur Datierung tocharischer Handschriften beitragen (What paleography can offer for the dating of Tocharian manuscripts). In Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond (ed.), Die Erforschung des Tocharischen und die alttürkische Maitrisimit. Symposium anläßlich des 100. Jahrestages der Entzifferung des Tocharischen, Brepols: Turnhout, pp. 277-324.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Klaus T. 1986. Bemerkungen zur westtocharischen Umgangssprache (Notes on West Tocharian vernacular). In Annemarie Etter (ed.), o-o-pe-ro-si. Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 635-649.Google Scholar

  • Stumpf, Peter. 1990. Die Erscheinungsformen des Westtocharischen. Ihre Beziehungen zueinander und ihre Funktionen (Westtocharian varieties. Function and relationship). Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar

  • Tamai, Tatsushi. 2011. Paläographische Untersuchungen zum B-Tocharischen (Paleographical studies on Tocharian B). Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

  • Winter, Werner. 1955. A linguistic classification of “Tocharian” B texts. Journal of the American Oriental Society 75, pp. 216-225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winter, Werner. 1958. Zur Dialektgliederung von ‘Tocharisch’ B (The dialects of Tocharian B). Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 75, pp. 233-237.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-12-28

Accepted: 2017-04-07

Published Online: 2017-06-10

Published in Print: 2017-01-26


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 157–177, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0009.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in