Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Shared vs. Primary Epistemic Authority in Jaminjung/Ngaliwurru

Eva Schultze-Berndt
Published Online: 2017-10-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0010

Abstract

This paper contributes to the typology of complex perspective markers by presenting an in-depth analysis of a system of epistemic authority marking which functionally overlaps with, but has no exact parallels in, similar systems attested cross-linguistically; it is also the first analysis of grammaticalised marking of epistemic authority in a language of Australia. Jaminjung/Ngaliwurru, a language of the Mirndi family, distinguishes between primary and shared epistemic authority by means of two non-obligatory clitics. By employing the first clitic, speakers claim privileged (asymmetrical) access to evidence informing their utterance; the holder of epistemic primacy shifts to addressees in questions. The second marker, which is transparently related to a 1st+2nd person minimal pronoun, indicates shared (symmetrical) epistemic access, but is further constrained in its distribution in that the evidence has to be accessible at the time of discourse and in that the encoded situation itself is not yet part of the common ground. In the light of the proposed analysis as well as cross-linguistic findings, it will be argued that epistemic authority markers more generally can be considered as part of a single functional domain with evidentials, and that this domain also includes egophoricity.

Keywords : evidentiality; epistemic authority; egophoricity; intersubjectivity; grammaticalisation

References

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W Dixon (eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-linguistic Typology, 1-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bergqvist, Henrik. 2016. Complex epistemic perspective in Kogi (Arwako). International Journal of American Linguistics, 82(1): 1-34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergqvist, Henrik. 2017. The role of ‘perspective’ in epistemic marking. Lingua, 186-187: 5-20.Google Scholar

  • Bergqvist, Henrik, Seppo Kittilä. 2015. Non-selected arguments as epistemic marking. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Leiden, 2-5 September 2015.Google Scholar

  • Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. Verb Agreement and Epistemic Marking: a typological journey from the Himalayas to the Caucasus. In B. Huber, M. Volkart, P. Widmer (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift fur Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 1-14. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar

  • Brugman, Claudia, Monica Macaulay. 2015. Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology, 19(2): 201-237.Google Scholar

  • Chadwick, Neil. 1984. The relationship of Jingulu and Jaminjungan. Batchelor, N.T.: School of Australian Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Chadwick, Neil. 1997. The Barkly and Jaminjung languages: a non-contiguous genetic grouping. In Tryon Darrell T., Michael Walsh (eds.), Boundary rider: Studies in the lexicology and comparative linguistics of Australian languages, 95-106. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Chooi, Soonja. 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In Joan Bybee, Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse, 165-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Creissels, Denis. 2008. Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 61(4): 309-325.Google Scholar

  • de Haan, Ferdinand. 2003. Visual evidentiality and its origins. Manuscript, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

  • DeLancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3): 289-321.Google Scholar

  • DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1: 33-52.Google Scholar

  • DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 369-382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language, 24(2): 379-422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donaldson, Tamsin. 1980. Ngiyambaa. The language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Drude, Sebastian. 2005. Tense, aspect and mood in Awetí verb-paradigms: analytic and synthetic forms. Paper presented at the DOBES Symposium ‘Progress in Endangered Languages Research’, May 2005, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Eberhard, David M. 2009. Mamaindê Grammar: A Northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar

  • Evans, Nicholas. 2001. The last speaker is dead - long live the last speaker. In Paul Newman, Martha Ratliff (eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork, 250-281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Evans, Nicholas. 2005. View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Construction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the thirty-first annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley.Google Scholar

  • Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of evidentials in Cusco Quechua. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar

  • Garrett, Edward J. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

  • Gipper, Sonja. 2011. Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakare: An interactional account. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Gipper, Sonja. 2014. Intersubjective evidentials in Yurakaré: Evidence from conversational data and a first step toward a comparative perspective. Studies in Language, 38(4): 792-835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Green, Ian, Rachel Nordlinger. 2004. Revisiting Proto-Mirndi. In Claire Bowern, Harold Koch (eds.), Australian Languages. Classification and the Comparative Method, 291-311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Grzech, Karolina Zofia. 2016. Discourse enclitics in Tena Kichwa: a corpus-based account of information structure and epistemic meaning. PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar

  • Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics, 5: 1-48.Google Scholar

  • Harvey, Mark. 2008. Proto Mirndi. A discontinuous language family in northern Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 58-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. Territories of knowledge in Japanese interaction. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2012a. The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1): 30-52.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2012b. Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45: 1-29.Google Scholar

  • Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36: 161-195.Google Scholar

  • Hintz, Daniel, Diane Hintz. 2017. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. Lingua, 186-187: 88-109.Google Scholar

  • Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2014. The grammar of knowledge in Kurtöp: evidentiality, mirativity, and expectation of knowledge. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W Dixon (eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-linguistic Typology, 108-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1957]. Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Selected writings Volume II: Word and language, 130-147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Kalsang, Jay Garfield, Margaret Speas, Jill de Villiers. 2013. Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidentials. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31: 517-561.Google Scholar

  • Kamio, Akio. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 20: 67-100.Google Scholar

  • Kamio, Akio. 1995. Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 24: 235-264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kamio, Akio. 1997. Evidentiality and some discourse characteristics in Japanese. In Akio Kamio (ed.), Directions in Functional Linguistics, 145-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Knuchel, Dominique. 2015. A comparative study of egophoric marking: Investigating its relation to person and epistemic marking in three language families. MA thesis, Stockholm University.Google Scholar

  • Landaburu, Jon. 2007. La modalisation du savoir en langue Andoke (Amazonie Colombienne). In Zlatka Guentchéva, Jon Landaburu (eds.), L’enonciation Mediatisee II: Le Traitement Épistemologique de L’information: illustrations amerindiennes et caucasiennes, 23-47. Leuven & Paris: Editions Peeters.Google Scholar

  • LaPolla, Randy. 2003. Evidentiality in Qiang. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in Evidentiality, 63-78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Laughren, Mary. 1982. A preliminary description of propositional particles in Warlpiri. In Stephen Swartz (ed.), Papers in Warlpiri Grammar, in memory of Lothar Jagst, 128-164. Berrimah, N.T.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 359-367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leiss, Elisabeth. 2012. Epistemicity, Evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, 39-66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

  • Loughnane, Robyn. 2011. Conjunct-Disjunct Alignment in Oksapmin. Paper presented at the Humboldt University Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Lowe, Ivan. 1999. Nambiquara. In R.M.W Dixon, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian Languages, 269-291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar

  • McGregor, William B. 2002. Verb classification in Australian languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Modicom, Pierre-Yves. 2012. Shared knowledge and epistemic reductionism: Covert semantics of German Modal Particles. In Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), Covert Patterns of Modality, 281-311. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Molochieva, Zarina. 2007. Category of Evidentiality and Mirativity in Chechen. Paper presented at the Conference on the Languages of the Caucasus, 7-9 December 2007, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig.Google Scholar

  • Molochieva, Zarina, Johanna Nichols. 2011. The diachronic trajectory of ethical datives: Chechen and Ingush. Presentation given at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, 8-11 September 2011, Logroño, Spain.Google Scholar

  • Mushin, Ilana. 2000. Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(7): 927-957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mushin, Ilana. 2012a. A Grammar of (Western) Garrwa. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Mushin, Ilana. 2012b. “Watching for Witness”. Evidential strategies and epistemic authority in Garrwa conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2): 270-293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newry, David, Keeley Palmer. 2003. “Whose language is it anyway?” Rights to restrict access to endangered languages: a North-East Kimberley example. In Joe Blythe, R. McKenna Brown (eds.), Maintaining the Links: Language, Identity and the Land. Proceedings of the Seventh FEL Conference, Broome, Western Australia, 22-24 September 2003. Bath: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar

  • Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Nikolaeva, Irina. 1999. The semantics of Northern Khanty evidentials. Journal de la Societé Finno-Ougrienne 88: 131-159.Google Scholar

  • Nuckolls, Janis, Lev Michael. 2012. Evidentials and evidential strategies in interactional and socio-cultural context. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2): 181-188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, Tyler. 2013. Rethinking Mirativity: The Expression and Implication of Surprise. Manuscript. Retrieved from http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/2FkYTg4O/Rethinking_Mirativity.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Raymond, Geoffrey, John Heritage. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35: 677-705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ritz, Marie-Eve, Eva Schultze-Berndt. 2015. Time for a change? The semantics and pragmatics of marking temporal progression in an Australian language. Lingua, 166: 1-21.Google Scholar

  • San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186-187: 120-143.Google Scholar

  • San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe, in press. Egophoricity: an introduction. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe, Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • San Roque, Lila, Robyn Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology, 16: 111-167.Google Scholar

  • San Roque, Lila, Bambi Schieffelin. 2017. Learning how to know: Egophoricity and the grammar of Kaluli (Bosavi, Trans New Guinea), with special reference to child language. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe, Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2003. Preverbs as an open word class in Northern Australian languages: synchronic and diachronic correlates. In Geert Booij, Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2003, 145-177. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2008. What do “do” verbs do? The semantic diversity of generalised action verbs. In Elisabeth Verhoeven, Stavros Skopeteas, Yong-Min Shin, Yoko Nishina, Johannes Helmbrecht (eds.), Studies on Grammaticalization, 185-208. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva. to appear. Two classes of verbs in Northern Australian languages: implications for the typology of polycategoriality. In Valentina Vapnarsky, Edy Veneziano (eds.), Lexical Polycategoriality. Cross-linguistic, crosstheoretical and language acquisition approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva, Patrick Caudal. 2016. On the reality of hypothetical possibilities: evidence from Jaminjung / Ngaliwurru. Paper presented at the SPINFEST (Semantics and Pragmatics in the North), York, 7 July 2016.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva, Patrick Caudal. in prep. The semantics of modality in Jaminjung/Ngaliwurru. Manuscript, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

  • Schultze-Berndt, Eva, Candide Simard, Mark Harvey, Dorothea Hoffmann, Jaminjung and Ngaliwurru communities. 2016. Annotated audiovisual corpus of Jaminjung and Ngaliwurru, 1993-2015. DOBES Archive, http://dobes.mpi.nl/research/.Google Scholar

  • Simard, Candide. 2010. The Prosodic Contours of Jaminjung, a language of Northern Australia. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

  • Simard, Candide. 2013. Prosodic encoding of declarative, interrogative and imperative sentences in Jaminjung, a language of Australia. Paper presented at the INTERSPEECH conference 2013.Google Scholar

  • Simard, Candide. 2016. Requesting information or mobilizing response: the prosody of sentence-final tags in Jaminjung. Paper presented at the 8th European Australianist Meeting, SOAS (London), 24 Sept 2016.Google Scholar

  • Skribnik, Elena, Olga Seesing. 2014. Evidentiality in Kalmyk. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W Dixon (eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-linguistic Typology, 148-170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Speas, Margaret. 2008. On the Syntax and Semantics of Evidentials. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5): 940-965.Google Scholar

  • Speas, Margaret. 2010. Evidentials as generalized functional heads. In Anne-Marie Di Sciullo (ed.), Interface legibility at the edge, 127-150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, Jakob Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 3-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Telles, Stella, W. Leo Wetzels. 2006. Evidentiality and Epistemic Mood in Lakondê. In J. Grazyna, J. Rowicka, Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a Verb? Studies in the Verbal Morphology of the Languages of the Americas, 235-252. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar

  • Tournadre, Nicolas, Randy LaPolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 37(2): 240-263.Google Scholar

  • van Egmond, Marie-Elaine. 2012. Enindhilyakwa phonology, morphosyntax and genetic position. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

  • Verhagen, Arie. 2008. Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, Esa Itkonen (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, 307-331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, An Van linden. 2008. The nature and origins of counterfactuality in simple clauses: crosslinguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics, 40: 1865-1895.Google Scholar

  • Wilkins, David P. 1986. Particles/clitics for criticism and complaint in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda). Journal of Pragmatics, 10(5): 575-596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zariquiey, Roberto. 2015. The category of addressee’s perspective in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 68(2): 143-164.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-08-26

Accepted: 2017-05-16

Published Online: 2017-10-20

Published in Print: 2017-10-26


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 178–218, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0010.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in