Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Two Meanings of Sound Symbolism

Hilke Elsen
Published Online: 2017-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0024

Abstract

This article deals with sound symbolism and the ways to interpret sound symbolic phenomena. Sound symbolism appears to be a universal phenomenon but linguists tend to neglect it or offer heterogeneous approaches and definitions. This paper is concerned with the role of motivation, as assumed in cases like cuckoo, and the question whether some sound symbolic effects might be the result of acquired statistical knowledge about the language system. The author argues that several aspects of sound symbolism such as natural/iconic or habitual relationships between sound and (facets of) referents interact but should be considered separately to gain a more realistic insight into the working of sound symbolism.

Keywords: Iconicity; definitions; size-sound symbolism; names; language universals; phonestheme

References

  • Abelin, Asa 1999. Studies in Sound Symbolism. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 17. Goteburg.Google Scholar

  • Abelin, Asa 2012. Relative frequency and semantic relations as organizing principles for the psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Hart, Christopher. Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings I. 128-145. Google Scholar

  • Akita, Kimi 2011. Toward a phonosemantic definition of iconic words. Michelucci, Pascal, Fischer, Olga, Ljungberg, Christina. Semblance and Signification. Iconicity in Language and Literature 10. Amsterdam et al. 3- 8.Google Scholar

  • Akita, Kimi 2013. The lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical correlates. Ellestrom, Lars, Fischer, Olga, Ljungberg, Christina. Iconic Investigations. Iconicity in Language and Literature 12. Amsterdam et al. 331-349. Google Scholar

  • Aksholakova, Assem 2014. Proper name as a clue symbol of identity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 112. 467- 471. Google Scholar

  • Anderson, Earl R. 1998. A Grammar of Iconism. Madison/London. Google Scholar

  • Bergen, Benjamin K. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80.2. 290-311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1958. Le symbolisme des voyelles significations des “I”. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 55. 403-423, 461-481. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1962. La brillance des voyelles. Archivum Linguisticum 14. 1-13. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1964a. Nouvelles recherches sur le symbolisme des voyelles. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 61. 75-88. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1964b. L’opposition des consonnes sourdes et muettes a-t-elle une valeur symbolique? Vie et langage 147. 367-370. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1965a. Dernieres recherches sur le symbolisme vocalique de la petitesse. Revue philosophique 155. 41-56. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1965b. Pop, fop, pof, fof. Vie et langage 159. 311-317. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1966a. Si les “r” etaient des “l”. Vie et langage 173. 468-474. Google Scholar

  • Chastaing, Maxime 1966b. Si les “r” etaient des “l”. Vie et langage 174. 502-507. Google Scholar

  • Childs, George T. 1994. African ideophones. Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols, John Ohala. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge. 178-204. Google Scholar

  • Childs, George T. 2015. Sound symbolism. Taylor, John R. The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford. 284-302. Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David 1995. Phonaesthetically speaking. English Today 42. 11.2. 8-12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. Ezra Pound among the Mawu. Ideophones and iconicity in Siwu. Michelucci, Pascal, Olga, Fischer, Ljungberg, Christina. Semblance and Signification. Iconicity in Language and Literature 10. Amsterdam et al. 39-54. Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass. 6/10. 654-672.Google Scholar

  • Dingemanse, Mark, Schuerman, Will, Reinisch, Eva, Tufvesseon, Sylvia, Mitterer, Holger 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language. 92/2. 117-133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drellishak, Scott 2006. Statistical Techniques for Detecting and Validating Phonesthemes. Seattle, WA. Google Scholar

  • Elsen, Hilke 2008. Phantastische Namen. Die Namen in Science Fiction und Fantasy zwischen Arbitrarität und Wortbildung. Tübingen.Google Scholar

  • Elsen, Hilke 2016. Einführung in die Lautsymbolik. Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Ertel, Suitbert 1969. Psychophonetik. Untersuchungen über Lautsymbolik und Motivation. Gottingen.Google Scholar

  • Etzel, Stefan 1983. Untersuchungen zur Lautsymbolik. Dissertation Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar

  • Feist, Jim 2013. “Sound symbolism” in English. Journal of Pragmatics 45.1. 104-118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fonagy, Ivan 1963. Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague.Google Scholar

  • French, Patrice L. 1976. Toward an explanation of phonetic symbolism. Word 28.3. 305-322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, Ohala, John 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Hough, Carole 2000. Towards an explanation of phonetic differentiation in masculine and feminine personal names. Journal of Linguistics 36. 1-11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hutchins, Sharon Suzanne 1998. The Psychological Reality, Variability, and Compositionality of English Phonesthemes. Dissertation. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

  • Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide 2006. Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. München.Google Scholar

  • Imai, Mutsumi, Kita, Sotaro 2014. The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 369. 2013.0298. 1-13.Google Scholar

  • Ivanova, Gergana 2006. Sound-symbolic approach to Japanese mimetic words. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 26. 103-114.Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, Roman 1971. Why “mama” and “papa”? Jakobson, Roman. Selected Writings I. Phonological Studies. Second, expanded edition. The Hague/Paris. 538-545 (orig. 1959).Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, Roman, Waugh, Linda R. 1987. The Sound Shape of Language. Berlin et al.Google Scholar

  • Jendraschek, Gerd 2002. Semantische Eigenschaften von Ideophonen im Türkischen. München.Google Scholar

  • Jespersen, Otto 1933. Symbolic value of the vowel i. Jespersen, Otto. Linguistica. Selected Papers in English, French and German by Otto Jespersen. 283-303 (orig. 1922).Google Scholar

  • Joseph, Brian D. 1994. Modern Greek ts: Beyond sound symbolism? Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, Ohala, John. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge. 222-236.Google Scholar

  • Kantartzis, Katerina, Imai, Mutsumi, Kita, Sotaro 2011. Japanese sound symbolism facilitates word learning in Englishspeaking children. Cognitive Science 35.3. 575-586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Kong-On 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13.1. 67-75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohler, Wolfgang 1929. Gestalt Psychology. New York.Google Scholar

  • Levickij, Viktor V. 2013. Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Glottotheory 4/1. 72-91.Google Scholar

  • Lieberson, Stanley, Bell, Eleanor O. 1992. Children’s first names: An empirical study of social taste. American Journal of Sociology 98.3. 511-554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieberson, Stanley, Mikelson, Kelly S. 1995. Distinctive African American names: An experimental, historical, and linguistic analysis of innovation. American Sociological Review 60.6. 928-946. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lyons, John 1977. Semantics I. Cambridge et al.Google Scholar

  • Magnus, Margaret 2001. What’s in a Word? Studies in Phonosemantics. Dissertation Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar

  • Müller, Hermann 1935. Experimentelle Beiträge zur Analyse des Verhältnisses von Laut und Sinn. Potsdam/Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999. The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28. 225-252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oelkers, Susanne 2003. Naming Gender. Empirische Untersuchungen zur phonologischen Struktur von Vornamen im Deutschen. Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, Ohala, John. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge. 325-347.Google Scholar

  • Oszmiańska, Aleksandra 2001. Sound symbolism as a universal drive to associate sound with meaning: A comparison between English and Japanese. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 37. 147-155.Google Scholar

  • Parault, Susan J., Parkinson, Meghan 2008. Sound symbolic word learning in the middle grades. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33.4. 647-671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterfalvi, Jean-Michel 1964. Etude du symbolisme phonetique par l’appariement de mots sans signification a des figures. L’année psychologique 64.2. 411-432.Google Scholar

  • Peterfalvi, Jean-Michel 1965. Les recherches experimentales sur le symbolisme phonetique. L’année psychologique 65.2. 439-474.Google Scholar

  • Peterfalvi, Jean-Michel. 1970. Recherches expérimentales sur le symbolisme phonétique. Paris.Google Scholar

  • Rosch, Eleanor H. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. Moore, T. E. Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York/London. 111-144.Google Scholar

  • Rüdebusch, Frauke, Ewels, Andrea-Eva 2016. Vornamen im Wandel der Zeit. Der Deutschunterricht 1/2016. 2-14.Google Scholar

  • Sapir, Edward 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12. 225-239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shinohara, Kazuko, Kawahara, Shigeto (to appear). A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The image of size. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 36. Berkeley. (Paper delivered 2010).Google Scholar

  • Simner, Julia, Hubbard, Edward M. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. OxfordGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, Insup Kim 1966. Kritik an Ertels und Dorsts expressiver Lautsymbolik. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 13. 100-109.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, Patrick D., Estes, Zachary 2011. Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64.12. 2392-2404.Google Scholar

  • Thorndike, Edward L. 1945a. The association of certain sounds with pleasant and unpleasant meaning. Psychological Review 52. 143-149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thorndike, Edward L. 1945b. On Orr’s hypotheses concerning the front and back vowels. The British Journal of Psychology 36.1. 10-14.Google Scholar

  • Ultan, Russell 1978. Size-sound symbolism. Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A., Moravcsik, Edith A. Universals of Human Language II. Phonology. Stanford. 525-568Google Scholar

  • Usnadze, Dimitri 1924. Ein experimenteller Beitrag zum Problem der psychologischen Grundlagen der Namengebung. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 5.1. 24-43.Google Scholar

  • Voeltz, Erhard F. K., Kilian-Hatz, Christa 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam et al.Google Scholar

  • Volke, Stefan 2007. Sprachphysiognomik. Grundlagen einer leibphänomenologischen Beschreibung der Lautwahrnehmung. Freiburg/München.Google Scholar

  • Whissell, Cynthia 1999. Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills 89. 19-48.Google Scholar

  • Whissell, Cynthia 2000. Phonoemotional profiling: A description of the emotional flavour of English texts on the basis of the phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills 91. 617-648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whissell, Cynthia 2001a. Sound and emotion in given names. Names 49.2. 97-120. Google Scholar

  • Whissell, Cynthia 2001b. Cues to referent gender in randomly constructed names. Perceptual and Motor Skills 93. 856-858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yoshida, Hanako 2012. A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism in children’s verb learning. Journal of Cognition and Development 13.2. 232-265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-03-29

Accepted: 2017-09-24

Published Online: 2017-10-28

Published in Print: 2017-10-26


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 491–499, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0024.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in