Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

What Lies Underneath a Political Speech?: Critical Discourse Analysis of Thai PM’s Political Speeches Aired on the TV Programme Returning Happiness to the People

Jonathan Rante Carreon
  • Department of English, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Samutprakarn, Thailand
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dr Chavalin Svetanant
Published Online: 2017-12-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0032

Abstract

The main goal of the study is to critically investigate the major elements of the political speeches of the Thai Prime Minister, Gen Prayuth Chan-ocha. Informed by van Dijk’s (1997) concept of Political Discourse Analysis, a corpus, composed of 10,672 word types and 325,398 word tokens, was examined for keywords related to the addressor, the addressee, and the political speech itself. The words with the highest relative frequencies were iteratively categorised into themes and a dialogic investigation was conducted on a portion of the original Thai version. The findings reveal that keywords relating to information conveyed by the addressor accounted for 62.86% (N=154) followed by keywords relating to functions of language at 22.04% (N=54). The high frequencies of these words shed light on the justification of the political, economic and social agenda, which were conveyed by the junta government using deontically modalised language. The quantitative and qualitative data analysis also indicate that the English and Thai speeches target different audiences. This discrepancy implicitly reflects an awkward situation where the military government attempts to present a good image to the international community while imposing actual military governance in the country.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis; deontic modality; keyword analysis; dialogic positioning; political speech

References

  • Al-Majali, Wala. 2015. Discourse analysis of the political speeches of the ousted Arab Presidents during the Arab Spring Revolution using Halliday and Hasan’s Framework of Cohesion. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(14): 96-108.Google Scholar

  • Aston, Guy, Lou Burnard. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Paul, Tony McEnery. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2): 197-226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, Paul, Tony McEnery (eds). 2015. Corpora and Discourse: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, M. Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination: four essays. M. Holquist, (ed). C. Emerson & M. Holquist, (trans). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen. 1994. Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied linguistics, 15(2), 169-189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating structure and use. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Michael. S. 2009. De-constructing Race and Identity in US Presidential Discourse: Barack Obama’s Speech on Race. Atlantis Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies. 75-94.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Gillian, George Yule. 1983. Teaching the spoken language (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan, Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse: An introductory essay. Modality in grammar and discourse.14:503-517.Google Scholar

  • Carreon, Jonathan Rante, Richard Watson Todd, John Knox. 2013a. Medical tourism communication of a Thai private hospital website. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice. 8(2): 165-185.Google Scholar

  • Carreon, Jonathan Rante, Richard Watson Todd. 2013b. Conflicts between prioritizing medical care and profit-making for a Thai hospital. International Journal of Language Studies. 7(1).Google Scholar

  • Chan-o-cha, Prayuth. (19 September, 2014). Return happiness to people. TV Program of the National Council for Peace and Order. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gd9Zt7MWY (13.08.2015).Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Springer.Google Scholar

  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Springer.Google Scholar

  • Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Chilton, Paul, Hailong Tian, & Ruth Wodak (eds). 2012. Discourse and Socio-political Transformations in Contemporary China. John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Collins, Chik, Peter E. Jones. 2006. Analysis of discourse as a form of history writing: A critique of Critical Discourse Analysis and an illustration of a cultural-historical alternative. Atlantic Journal of Communication. 14 (1-2): 51-69.Google Scholar

  • Cook, Karen S. 2001. Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar

  • De Fina, Anna. 1995. Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 15(3), 379-410.Google Scholar

  • Dylgjeri, Ardita. The function and importance of discourse markers in political discourse. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Educational Sciences (ICES 2014) 24-25 April, Tirana, Albania. 553-557.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2002. Analysing Discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language: Language in social life series. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of critical discourse analysis. 5: 121-138.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2000. Discourse, Social Theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2): 163-195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freisinger, Randall. 1982. Cross-disciplinary writing programs: Beginnings. Language Connections: Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. 3-13.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Mark A, Elizabeth Dugan, Beiyao Zheng, Aneil K. Mishra. 2001. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, Can it be measured, and Does it matter? The Milbank Quarterly. 79(4): 613-639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hammersley, Martyn. 1997. On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Language and Communication 17: 237-248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hunston, Susan. 2010. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hunston, Susan. 2004. Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. Corpora and Discourse, 9, 157-188.Google Scholar

  • Jabeen, Farhat, M. Asim Rai, Sara Arif. 2011. A corpus based study of discourse markers in British and Pakistani speech. International Journal of Language Studies. 5(4), 69-86.Google Scholar

  • Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. Eloquence in an electronic age: The transformation of political speechmaking. Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

  • Jewitt, Carey. ed. 2009. The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 28-39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Peter E. 2004. Discourse and the materialist conception of history: Critical comments on Critical Discourse Analysis. Historical Materialism. 12(1): 9-125.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Peter E. 2007. Why there is no such thing as critical discourse analysis. Language and Communication. 27: 337-368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, Peter E., Chik Collins. 2006. Political analysis versus Critical Discourse Analysis in the treatment of ideology: Some implications for the study of communication. Atlantic Journal of Communication. 14(1-2): 28-50.Google Scholar

  • Kazemian, Bahram, Somayyeh Hashemi. 2014. Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s 2012 speeches: Views from systemic functional linguistics and rhetoric. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 4(6): 1178-1187.Google Scholar

  • Klebanov, Beata Beigman, Daniel Diermeier, Eyal Beigman. 2008. Lexical cohesion analysis of political speech. Political Analysis. 16(4): 447-463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kress, Gunther. 2009. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kress, Gunther R., Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Krippendorff, Klaus. 2012. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 3rd Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 1991. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research, 25-32.Google Scholar

  • Landis, J. Richard, Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33: 159-174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maalej, Zouheir A. 2012. The ‘Jasmine Revolt’ has made the ‘Arab Spring’: A critical discourse analysis of the last three political speeches of the ousted president of Tunisia 1. Discourse & Society. 23(6): 679-700.Google Scholar

  • Machin, David. 2013. What is multimodal critical discourse studies?. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), pp.347-355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, R. James, Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Mio, Jeffrey Scott. 1997. Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and symbol, 12(2), 113-133.Google Scholar

  • Mulderrig, Jane. 2003. Consuming education: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of social actors in New Labour’s education policy. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 1: 96-123. Available [Online]: http://www.jceps.com/PDFs/01-1-04.pdf on 20 October, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Murdoch, Lindsay. Thai PM Prayuth jokes he has power to ‘execute’ journalists. The Sydney Morning Herald: World, 26th March 2015. http://www.smh.com.au/world/thai-pm-prayuth-jokes-he-has-power-to-execute-journalists-20150326-1m84rx.html (13.08.2015).Google Scholar

  • Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke, 14.Google Scholar

  • Niedrich, Anastacia. 2011. Removing Categorical Constraints on Equal Employment Opportunities and Anti-Discrimination Protections. Mich. J. Gender & L. 18: 25.Google Scholar

  • Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, Janneke Diepeveen. 2010. On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1): 16-34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Obeng, Samuel Gyasi. 1997. Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(1), 49-83.Google Scholar

  • O’Halloran, Kieran. 2007. Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics. 28(1): 1-24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Partington, Alan. 2004. “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International journal of corpus linguistics. 9(1), 131-156.Google Scholar

  • Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, Charlotte Taylor. 2013. Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpusassisted discourse studies (CADS). Vol. 55. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Rayson, Paul, Garside, Roger. 2000. Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Annual meeting of the ACL: Proceedings of the workshop on comparing corpora. 9: 1-6.Google Scholar

  • Roberts, Carlos A., Mara S. Aruguete. 2000. Task and socioemotional behaviors of physicians: A test of reciprocity and social interaction theories in analogue physician-patient encounters. Social Science & Medicine. 50(3): 309-315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seidel, Gill. 1985. Political Discourse Analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Scott, Mike. 1997. PC analysis of keywords - and key keywords. System. 25(2): 233-245. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scott, Mike. 2000. Focusing on the text and its key words. In Burnard, Lou, Tony McEnery (eds.), Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective 2. 103-122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Stubbs, Michael. 1997. Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In Ryan, Ann, Alison Wray (eds.), Evolving Models of Language. 100-116. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Svetanant, Chavalin. 2009. Revealing Linguistic Power: Discourse Practice toward “Youth” in Japanese and Thai Newspapers. Japan Review. 21: 225-240.Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society. 4(2): 249-283.Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, Teun. A. 1997. What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 11(1): 11-52.Google Scholar

  • van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. New forms of writing, new visual competencies. Visual studies, 23(2), pp.130-135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors in discourse. In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, Coulthard, Malcolm (eds.), Text and practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. 32-70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Voloshinov, N.Valentin. 1995. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, Bakhtinian Thought - an Introductory Reader. D. Dentith, L. Matejka & I.R. Titunik, (trans). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wang, Junling. 2010. A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 1(3): 254-261.Google Scholar

  • Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak. 2007 eds. Critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Widdowson, Henry. G. 1995. Discourse analysis: a critical view. Language and Literature. 4(3): 157-172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, R. R. Peter. 2015. Appraisal website: www.grammatics.cm/appraisal.Google Scholar

  • Widdowson, Henry. G. 1998. The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics. 19: 136-151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, George M. 1991. Reference and pronominal descriptions. The Journal of philosophy, 88(7), 359-387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wodak, Ruth. 2015. Performing Europe: backstage versus frontstage politics in the European Parliament. In C Carter & M Lawn (eds), Governing Europe’s spaces: European Union re-imagined. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 27-55.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, Ruth, and Paul Chilton. 2005 eds. A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Vol. 13. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, 2009 eds. Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage.Google Scholar

  • Zaiontz, Charles. 2016. Real statistics using Excel: Cohen’s Kappa. http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/cohens-kappa/ (10.07.2016).Google Scholar

  • Zupnik, Yael-Janette. 1994. A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 21(4), 339-383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-03-03

Accepted: 2017-11-15

Published Online: 2017-12-22

Published in Print: 2017-12-20


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 638–655, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0032.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in