Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question

Richard Waltereit
Published Online: 2018-05-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0004

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss critically the traditional view of reanalysis, taking into account recent debates about the concept. In particular, I argue that the debate about reanalysis tends to conflate two interpretations of reanalysis: reanalysis as a type of language change among other ones, and reanalysis as the recognition or “ratification” of any kind of change. I offer a possible explanation of that potential confusion. I then illustrate this distinction using the history of the French est-ce que question as a case study. I report original diachronic research on the history of that construction. Further, I discuss implications both at a conceptual-theoretical level and at a practical level for further diachronic research. The paper concludes with a summary and discussion of the findings.

Keywords: Reanalysis; Language change; interrogatives; Conventionalization

References

  • Armstrong, Nigel (2001). Social and stylistic variation in spoken French. A comparative approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ball, Rodney (2000). Colloquial French grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Behnstedt, Peter (1973). Viens-tu? Est-ce que tu viens? Tu viens? Formen und Strukturen des direkten Fragesatzes im Französischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

  • BFM = Base de français médiéval. Lyon : ENS de Lyon, Laboratoire IHRIM, 2016, <txm.bfm-corpus.org>.Google Scholar

  • Brunot, Ferdinand, & Bruneau, Charles (1969). Précis de grammaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Masson Et Cie.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Lyle (1998). Historical linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Coseriu, Eugenio (1978[1957]). Sincronía, diacronía e historia. El problema del cambio lingüistico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

  • Coveney, Aidan (1996). Variability in spoken French: a sociolinguistic study of interrogation and negation. Exeter: Elm Bank.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William (2000). Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • De Smet, Henrik (2009). Analysing reanalysis. In Lingua: International review of general linguistics, 119(11), 1728-1755.Google Scholar

  • De Smet, Henrik (2013). Does innovation need reanalysis?. In E. Coussé & F. von Mengden (Ed.), Usage-based approaches to language change (pp. 23-48). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Detges, Ulrich, & Waltereit, Richard (2002). Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis. A semantic - pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. In Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 21(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Detges, Ulrich, & Waltereit, Richard (2008). Syntactic change from within and from without syntax. In U. Detges & R. Waltereit (Ed.), The Paradox of grammatical change. Perspectives from romance (pp. 13-30). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Eckardt, Regine (2006). Meaning change in grammaticalization. An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: University Press. Google Scholar

  • Ehmer, Oliver & Rosemeyer, Malte (to appear) : Contrast and inferences in but-prefaced partial interrogatives: a synchronic and diachronic analysis of SpanishGoogle Scholar

  • Foulet, Lucien (1921). Comment ont évolué les formes de l’interrogation. In Romania, 47, 243-348. FRANTEXT = www.frantext.frGoogle Scholar

  • Greive, Artur (1974). Neufranzösische Formen der Satzfrage im Kontext. Mainz/Wiesbaden: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar

  • Hansen, Maj-Britt M. (2001). Syntax in interaction. Form and function of yes/no interrogatives in spoken standard French. Studies in Language, 25(3), 463-519. DOI: 10.1075/sl.25.3.04mosCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, Maj-Britt M. (2008). Particles at the semantics, pragmatics interface: synchronic and diachronic issues. A study with special reference to the French phrasal adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Harris, Alice C., & Campbell, Lyle (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin (1998). Does grammaticalization need reanalysis?. In Studies in Language, 22(2), 315-351. DOI: 10.1075/sl.22.2.03hasCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heine, Bernd (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Ed.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83-101). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, Egbert (1980). Strukturen der Frage im Französischen: Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchungen zur direkten Frage im Französischen des 15. Jahrhunderts (1450-1500). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

  • Koch, Peter (2004): Metonymy between pragmatics, reference and diachrony. In metaphorik.de, 07, 6-54.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William (2007). Transmission and diffusion. In Language, 83, 344-387.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Langacker, Ronald W. (1977). Syntactic reanalysis. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanism of syntactic change (pp. 57-139). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Lapesa, Rafael (2000). Estudios de morfosintaxis histórica del español. Madrid: GredosGoogle Scholar

  • Myers, Lindsy L. (2007). Wh-interrogatives in spoken French. A corpus based analysis of their form and function (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/3235/myersl19237.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar

  • Nilsenová, Marie (2006). Rises and falls. Studies in the semantics and pragmatics of intonation. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. A. Hendrick, & M. F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior (pp 178-203). Chicago: Chicago Ling. Soc.Google Scholar

  • Ohala, John J. (1989). Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In L.E. Breivik & E.H. Jahr (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the study of its causes (pp. 173-198). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Schulze, Alfred (1888). Der altfranzösische direkte Fragesatz: Ein Beitrag zur Syntax des Französischen. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar

  • Schwenter, Scott & Waltereit, Richard (2010). Presupposition accommodation and language change. In K. Davidse, H. Cuyckens, L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification, and grammaticalization (pp. 75-102). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Seelbach, Dieter (1983). Linguistik und französischer Grammatikunterricht: Eine Einführung für Lehrende und Studierende. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

  • Söll, Ludwig (1971). Der neufranzösische direkte Fragesatz in einem Corpus der Kindersprache. In E. Coseriu & W-D. Stempel (Ed.), Sprache und Geschichte. Festschrift für Harri Meier zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 493-506). München: Fink.Google Scholar

  • Timberlake, Alan (1977). Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanism of syntactic change (pp. 141-177). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Traugott, Elizabeth C., & Dasher, Richard B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Waltereit, Richard (1999). Reanalyse als metonymischer Prozeß. In J. Lang & I. Neumann-Holzschuh (Ed.), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen (pp. 19-29). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Whitman, John (2012). Misparsing and syntactic reanalysis. In A. van Kemenade & N. de Haas (Ed.), Historical Linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Nijmegen, 10-14 August 2009 (pp. 69-88). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.320.04whiCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-08-08

Accepted: 2018-03-16

Published Online: 2018-05-24


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 56–69, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0004.

Export Citation

© 2018 Richard Waltereit, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in