Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Ehrhart, Sabine

1 Issue per year


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-9969
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Modal Adverbs in FDG: Putting the Theory to the Test

Evelien Keizer
Published Online: 2018-11-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0019

Abstract

One of the distinctive features of the theory of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) is that it distinguishes various hierarchically organized layers of analysis, each of which is provided with a slot for modifiers relevant at the layer in question. Linear placement of these modifiers is determined by the layer to which they belong, with the ordering of elements taking place in a top-down, outward-inward manner. The model, in other words, makes predictions concerning the (relative) clausal position of different types of modifiers. In addition, the model places constraints on the occurrence of different types of modifiers in embedded environments (e.g. within the complement of certain types of verbs). Finally, the model places constraints on which modifiers can be expected to co-occur in coordinated constructions. The aim of the present paper is to test these predictions by examining the function, position and distribution of ten adverbs expressing various kinds of modality. Data from the British National Corpus (BYU-BNC) is used (i) to determine whether the predictions following from the overall organization of the FDG model are supported by empirical data; and (ii) to refine, where necessary, the classifications of modal adverbs proposed in the literature.

Keywords: Functional Discourse Grammar; modal adverbs; coordination; embedding; word order

References

  • Bastos, Sandra D. G., Vânia C. C. Galvão, Sebastião C. L. Gonçalves, Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher Kees Hengeveld, Gisele C. Sousa, Valéria Vendrame. 2007. The expressibility of modality in representational complement clauses in Brazilian Portuguese. In: Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize Mattos, Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Advances in Functional Discourse Grammar. Special issue of Alfa - Revista de Lingüística 51(2). 189-212.Google Scholar

  • Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8 (2). 337-350.Google Scholar

  • Boland, Annerieke. 2006. Aspect, Tense and Modality: Theory, Typology, Acquisition (PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114. 683-710.Google Scholar

  • Dall‘Aglio Hattnher, Marize Mattos, Kees Hengeveld. 2016. The grammaticalization of modal verbs in Brazilian Portuguese: A synchronic approach. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 15 (1). 1-14. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc.Google Scholar

  • Declerck, Renaat. 1988. Studies on copular sentences, clefts and pseudoclefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press/Fortis Publications.Google Scholar

  • Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Giomi, Riccardo. 2014. Tense, time location and the Episode. A revised approach to temporal expression in FDG. Paper presented at the Third international Conference on Functional Discourse Grammar, 17-20 September 2014, University of Jaén, Spain.Google Scholar

  • Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, Peter, Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts: Syntax and Semantics 3, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Hacquard, Valentine & Alexis Wellwood, 2012. Embedding epistemic modals in English: a corpus-based study. Semantics & Pragmatics Volume 5, Article 4: 1-29.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, M.A.K., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edition, revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Haumann, Dagmar. 2007. Adverb Licensing and Clause Structure in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees. 1988. Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6. 227-269.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Discourse Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25. 127-157.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees. 1997. Adverbs in Functional Grammar. In: Wotjak, Gerd (ed.), Toward a Functional Lexicology, 126-136. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees. 2013. A new approach to clausal constituent order. In: Mackenzie, J. Lachlan, Hella Olbertz (eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, 15:38 Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Hengeveld, Kees. This issue.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees, J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hengeveld, Kees, Marize Mattos Dall‘Aglio Hattnher. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53(3). 479-524. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, Francis R. 1979. The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and Modality in English. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey Pullum (eds.). 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2008. Prosody and function of English comment clauses. Folia Linguistica 42 (1). 83-134.Google Scholar

  • Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2009. English comment clauses: position, prosody, and scope. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34 (1). 49-75.Google Scholar

  • Keizer, Evelien. 2015. A Functional Discourse Grammar for English. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Keizer, Evelien. 2018. Truth-conditionality and non-restrictiveness in FDG. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Functional Discourse Grammar, Salvador, Brazil, 26-28 September 2018.Google Scholar

  • Kemp, Lois. This issue.Google Scholar

  • Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1996. Adverb syntax and phrase structure. In: di Scullio, Anne-Marie (ed.), Configurations: essays on structure and interpretation, 99-127. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

  • Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2004. The feature-based theory of adverb syntax. In: Austin, Jennifer R., Stefan Engelberg, Gisa Rauh (eds.), Adverbials, The interaction between Meaning, Context and Syntactic Structure [Linguistik Aktuel/Linguistics Today 70], 205-252. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2015. Comparative adverb syntax. A cartographic approach. In: Pittner, Karin, Daniela Elsner, Fabian Barteld (eds.), Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects (Studies in Language Companion Series), 207-238. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2014. Stacks and layers: horizontal and vertical scope and the distinction between episode and stateof- affairs. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Functional Discourse Grammar, 17-20 September 2014, University of Jaén, Spain.Google Scholar

  • Mittwoch, Anita, Rodney Huddleston, Peter Collins. 2002. The clause: adjuncts. In: Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, 663-784. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nelson, Gerald, Sean Wallis, Bas Aarts. 2002. Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. A Cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Olbertz, Hella, Sandra D. G. Bastos. 2013. Objective and subjective deontic neccesity in FDG - evidence from Spanish auxiliary expressions. In Mackenzie, J. Lachlan, Hella Olbertz (eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, 277-300. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K., Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Adjectives and adverbs. In: Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, 525-595. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Karin Aijmer. 2007. The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in language 26 (1). 125-163.Google Scholar

  • Vismans, Roel. 1994. Modal patterns in Dutch directives: a study in Functional Grammar. Studies in Language and Language Use 11. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-09

Accepted: 2018-07-19

Published Online: 2018-11-10


Citation Information: Open Linguistics, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 356–390, ISSN (Online) 2300-9969, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0019.

Export Citation

© by Evelien Keizer, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in