Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
Weitere Optionen …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
Alle Formate und Preise
Weitere Optionen …

Badiou and Frege: A Continental Critique of Logical Form

Joseph M. Spencer
Online erschienen: 29.08.2018 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0008

Abstract

Various critiques of important (early) analytic thinkers made by Alain Badiou in the late 1960s have been largely overlooked by continental philosophers and entirely overlooked by analytic philosophers. This paper looks in detail at Badiou’s 1969 essay ‟Mark and Lack,” providing an exposition and clarification of his direct and sustained critique of Gottlob Frege’s supposed ideological (rather than scientific) philosophical commitments. Badiou’s intellectual context is analyzed in some detail, not only explaining his theoretical debt to his then-master Louis Althusser, but also clarifying his understandings of the notions of ‟the scientific” and ‟the ideological” in light of the projects of Gaston Bachelard and Georges Canguilhem. A philosophical exposition of Badiou’s point-by-point critique of Frege’s conception of logic follows. Finally, the paper concludes with an analysis of the more general relevance of Badiou’s half-century-old critiques in light of developments in contemporary analytic metaphysics, especially those indebted to W. V. O. Quine and Donald Davidson. In essence, Davidson’s Fregean reconfiguration of Tarski’s work on truth (more explicit than, but not unrelated to, Quine’s work) places contemporary analytic metaphysics within the scope of what Badiou directly criticizes. It is suggested that Badiou’s critique find a place in discussions of analytic metaphysics.

Keywords: Gottlob Frege; Alain Badiou; Donald Davidson; Alfred Tarski; ideology; philosophy of science; analytic metaphysics; analytic-continental dialogue; Gaston Bachelard; Georges Canguilhem

References

  • Althusser, Louis. For Marx. Trans. Ben Brewster. New York: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Althusser, Louis. The Future Lasts Forever: A Memoir. Ed. Olivier Corpet and Yann Moulier Boutang. Trans. Richard Veasey. New York: The New Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Althusser, Louis. On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Trans. G. M. Goshgarian. New York: Verso, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Althusser, Louis. “Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists” and Other Essays. Ed. Gregory Elliott. Trans. Ben Brewster et al. New York: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Bachelard, Gaston. L’activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1951.Google Scholar

  • Bachelard, Gaston. Les intuitions atomostiques: essai de classification. Paris: J. Vrin, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Bachelard, Gaston. The New Scientific Spirit. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Badesa, Calixto. The Birth of Model Theory: Löwenheim’s Theorem in the Frame of the Theory of Relatives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Being and Event. Trans. Oliver Feltham. New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. The Concept of Model: An Introduction to the Materialist Epistemology of Mathematics. Ed. and trans. Zachary Luke Fraser and Tzuchien Tho. Melbourne: re.press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Conditions. Trans. Steven Corcoran. New York: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. “Formulas of L’Étourdit.” In Alain Badiou and Barbara Cassin, There’s No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lessons on Lacan, trans. Susan Spitzer and Kenneith Reinhard (New York: Columbia University Press, 2017), 45-62.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Infinite Thought: Truth and the Return of Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Oliver Feltham and Justin Clemens. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Logics of Worlds: Being and Event II. Trans. Alberto Toscano. New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. “Mark and Lack.” Trans. Zachary Luke Fraser and Ray Brassier. In Concept and Form: Key Texts from the “Cahiers pour l’Analyse”, 2 vols., ed. Peter Hallward and Knox Peden (New York: Verso, 2012), 1:159-85.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. “Marque et Manque: à propos du Zéro.” Cahiers pour l’Analyse 10.8 (Winter 1969): 150-73.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Metapolitics. Trans. Jason Barker. New York: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Number and Numbers. Trans. Robin Mackay. Malden, MA: Polity, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Pocket Pantheon: Figures of Postwar Philosophy. Trans. David Macey. New York: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. “The (Re)commencement of Dialectical Materialism.” In The Adventure of French Philosophy, ed. and trans. Bruno Bosteels (New York: Verso, 2012), 133-70.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. The Subject of Change: Lessons from the European Graduate School. Ed. Duane Rousselle. New York: Atropos Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain. Theory of the Subject. Trans. Bruno Bosteels. New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain, and Gilles Haéri. In Praise of Mathematics. Trans. Susan Spitzer. Malden, MA: Polity, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Badiou, Alain, and Élisabeth Roudinesco. Jacques Lacan, Past and Present: A Dialogue. Trans. Jason E. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Berto, Francesco. There’s Something about Gödel: The Complete Guide to the Incompleteness Theorem. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Berto, Francesco, and Matteo Plebani. Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide. New York: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Bosteels, Bruno. Badiou and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Canguilhem, Georges. A Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings of Georges Canguilhem. Ed. François Delaporte. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Zone Books, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Canguilhem, Georges. Knowledge of Life. Ed. Paola Marrati and Todd Meyers. Trans. Stefanos Geroulanos and Daniela Ginsburg. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language.” Trans. Arthur Pap. In Logical Positivism, ed. A. J. Ayer (New York: Free Press, 1959), 60-81.Google Scholar

  • Carnap, Rudolf. “Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science.” In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Volume I, ed. Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, and Charles W. Morris (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938), 42-62.Google Scholar

  • Carnap, Rudolf. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar

  • Cassin, Barbara. “Ab-sense, or Lacan from A to D.” In Alain Badiou and Barbara Cassin, There’s No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lessons on Lacan, trans. Susan Spitzer and Kenneith Reinhard (New York: Columbia University Press, 2017), 3-43Google Scholar

  • Coffa, J. Alberto. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “The Method of Truth in Metaphysics.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 199-214.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 183-98.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “Radical Interpretation.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 125-39.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “True to the Facts.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 37-54.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “Truth and Meaning.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 17-36.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. Truth and Predication. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Dummett, Michael. Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Dummett, Michael. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Dummett, Michael. “Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59.1 (1959): 141-62.Google Scholar

  • Earman, John. “Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, ed. Paul Horwich (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993), 9-36.Google Scholar

  • Fink, Bruce. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System. Ed. and trans. Montgomery Furth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “Boole’s Logical Calculus and the Concept-Script.” In Posthumous Writings, ed. Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, and Friedrich Kaulbach, trans. Peter Long and Roger White (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), 9-46.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. The Foundations of Arithmetic. 2nd rev. ed. Trans. J. L. Austin. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “Function and Concept.” In Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. Brian McGuinness, trans. Max Black et al (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 137-56Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “Logical Investigations.” In Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. Brian McGuinness, trans. Max Black et al (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 351-406.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “Notes for Ludwig Darmstaedter.” In Posthumous Writings, ed. Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, and Friedrich Kaulbach, trans. Peter Long and Roger White (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), 253-57.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “On Concept and Object.” In Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. Brian McGuinness, trans. Max Black et al (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 182-94.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “On Sense and Meaning.” In Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. Brian McGuinness, trans. Max Black et al (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 157-77.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Ed. Gottfried Gabriel et al. Trans. Hans Kaal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

  • Gabriel, Gottfried, and Wolfgang Keinzler, eds. “Diary: Written by Professor Dr. Gottlob Frege in the Time from 10 March to 9 April 1924.” Trans. Richard L. Mendelsohn. Inquiry 39 (1996): 303-42.Google Scholar

  • Glock, Hans-Johann. What Is Analytic Philosophy? New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Hahn, Hans, Otto Neurath, and Rudolf Carnap. “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis [The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle].” In Otto Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology, ed. Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen (Boston: D. Reidel Publishing, 1973), 299-318.Google Scholar

  • Hallward, Peter. Badiou: A Subject to Truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Hallward, Peter, and Knox Peden, eds. Concept and Form. 2 vols. New York: Verso, 2012.Google Scholar

  • James, William. The Principles of Psychology. 2 vols. New York: Dover Publications, 1950.Google Scholar

  • Johnston, Adrian. Prolegomena to Any Future Materialism, Volume One: The Outcome of Contemporary French Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability.” In The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1933, with an Autobiographical Interview, ed. James Conant and John Haugeland (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 33-57.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, William S. Louis Althusser and the Traditions of French Marxism. New York: Lexington Books, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Livingston, Paul M. Philosophy and the Vision of Language. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Miller, Jacques-Alain. “Suture.” Trans. Zachary Luke Fraser and Ray Brassier. In Concept and Form: Key Texts from the “Cahiers pour l’Analyse”, 2 vols., ed. Peter Hallward and Knox Peden (New York: Verso, 2012), 1:91-101.Google Scholar

  • Milne, Peter. “Frege’s Folly: Bearerless Names and Basic Law V.” In The Cambridge Companion to Free, ed. Michael Potter and Tom Ricketts (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 465-508.Google Scholar

  • Nagel, Ernest, and James R. Newman. Gödels Proof. New York: New York University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

  • Plato. Parmenides. Trans. Mary Louise Gill and Paul Ryan. In Plato: Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997), 359-97.Google Scholar

  • Pluth, Ed. Badiou: A Philosophy of the New. Malden, MA: Polity, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. O. “On What There Is.” In Quintessence: Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W. V. Quine, ed. Roger F. Gibson, Jr. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004), 177-92.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In Quintessence: Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W. V. Quine, ed. Roger F. Gibson, Jr. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004), 31-53Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. O. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960.Google Scholar

  • Rancière, Jacques. Althusser’s Lesson. Trans. Emiliano Battista. New York: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Reck, Erich H., and Steve Awodey, eds. Frege’s Lectures on Logic: Carnap’s Student Notes, 1910-1914. Trans. Erich H. Reck and Steve Awodey. Chicago and LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.” In Logic and Knowledge (New York: Routledge, 1997), 321-43.Google Scholar

  • Soames, Scott. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Soames, Scott. “The Place of Willard Van Orman Quine in Analytic Philosophy.” In “Analytic Philosophy in America,” and Other Historical and Contemporary Essays (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014), 104-38.Google Scholar

  • Spencer, Joseph M. “Formalism and the Notion of Truth.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Tarski, Alfred. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd ed., ed. John Corcoran, trans. J. H. Woodger (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1983), 152-278.Google Scholar

  • Tarski, Alfred. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. New York: Dover Publications, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Tarski, Alfred. “The Semantic Conception of Truth, and the Foundations of Semantics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4.3 (March 1944): 341-76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tho, Tzuchien, and Giuseppe Bianco, eds. Badiou and the Philosophers: Interrogating 1960s French Philosophy. Trans. Tzuchien Tho and Giuseppe Bianco. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Weiner, Joan. Frege. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Weiner, Joan. Frege in Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel C., III. “Davidson, Derrida, and Difference.” In Dialogues with Davidson: Acting, Interpreting, Understanding, ed. Jeff Malpas (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011), 29-42.Google Scholar

  • Wolin, Richard. The Wind from the East: French Intellectuals, the Cultural Revolution, and the Legacy of the 1960s. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Wrathall, Mark A. “The Conditions of Truth in Heidegger and Davidson.” In Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 40-56.Google Scholar

Artikelinformationen

Erhalten: 06.06.2018

Angenommen: 31.07.2018

Online erschienen: 29.08.2018


Quellenangabe: Open Philosophy, Band 1, Heft 1, Seiten 94–114, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0008.

Zitat exportieren

© by Joseph M. Spencer, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Kommentare (0)