Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Quine, Davidson, Relative Essentialism and the Question of Being

Samuel C. Wheeler
Published Online: 2018-08-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0009

Abstract

Relative essentialism, the view that multiple objects about which there are distinct de re modal truths can occupy the same space at the same time, is a metaphysical view that dissolves a number of metaphysical issues. The present essay constructs and defends relative essentialism and argues that it is implicit in some of the ideas of W. V. Quine and Donald Davidson. Davidson’s published views about individuation and sameness can accommodate the common-sense insights about change and persistence of Aristotle and Kripke. Aristotle and Kripke have to give up unmediated direct reference resting on a unique correct articulation of reality into entities. Davidson has to acknowledge a distinction between descriptions giving accidental and those giving essential features of an object. Quine and Davidson were in a position to be a relative essentialist, but were over-impressed by supervenience. The relative essentialist view of beings developed from Quine and Davidson strongly suggests the Heideggerian distinction between beings and Being, and is the perspective from which analytic philosophy can engage that topic. Relative essentialism also connects analytic philosophy to Derrida’s thinking about differance.

Keywords: Quine; Davidson; Kripke; Aristotle; supervenience; sorites; essentialism; necessity; truth; mental events; Being; Heidegger; Derrida; differance

References

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Apostle, H.G. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1966.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Translated by Apostle, H.G. Peripatetic Press, Grinnell, Iowa, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. On the Soul. Translated by Apostle, H.G. Peripatetic Press, Grinnell, Iowa, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “Emeroses by Other Names.”The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 63, No. 24, 1966 778-780.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “Truth and Meaning”. In Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 1984. 17-36.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “What Metaphors Mean.” In Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 1984. 245-264.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” In Davidson Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press, 1980. 105-122.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “True to the Facts”. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 66, No. 21, Sixty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division (Nov. 6, 1969), 748-764/.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “Mental Events”. In Davidson Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press, 1980. 207-227.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 1984. 183-198.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 93, No. 6, 1996. 263-278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, Donald. Truth and Predication. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 2005.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “Differance.” In Derrida, Margins of Philosophy. U of Chicago Press, 1982. 1-27.Google Scholar

  • Geach, P.T. “Identity,” in Geach, Logic Matters. Oxford: Blackwell, 1972. 238-247.Google Scholar

  • Goodman, Nelson. “The New Riddle of Induction,” In Goodman, Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Harvard UniversityPress, 1955. 63-83.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. The Origin of the Work of Art”, in Off the Beaten Track, edited and translated by Julian Young and KennethGoogle Scholar

  • Haynes. Cambridge UP, 2002. 1-56.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. “What is Metaphysics?” in Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, revised and expanded edition, London: Routledge, 1993. 93-110.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith, 1933.Google Scholar

  • Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity, Harvard UP, 1980.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. “On What There Is.” In Quine, W. V. From a Logical Point of View, Harvard UP, 1953. 1-19.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. “Reference and Modality.” In Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, 1953. 139-159.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. “Three Grades of Modal Involvement.” In Quine, The Ways of Paradox and other Essays. Harvard University Press, 1976. 158-176.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. Word and Object. Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

  • Quine, W. V. “Ontological Relativity” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press 1969. 26-68..Google Scholar

  • Stalnaker, Robert. Mere Possibilities. Princeton UP, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Tarski, Afred. “The Concept of Truth In Formalized Languages,” in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford UP, 1956.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel. “Reference and Vagueness.” Synthese, Volume 30, 1976. 367-379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel. “Megarian Paradoxes as Eleatic Arguments”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 20:3. 287-295. 1983.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel. “Derrida’s Differance and Plato’s Different”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59, 1999. 999-1013.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel. Deconstruction as Analytic Philosophy, Stanford UP, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel. “Remembering Donald Davidson: His 1967 Undergraduate Philosophy of Language Course.” In Baghramian, ed. Donald Davidson: Life and Words. Routledge, 2012. 65-70.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Samuel. Neo-Davidsonian Metaphysics: From the True to the Good. Routledge, 2013.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-09

Accepted: 2018-07-31

Published Online: 2018-08-25


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 115–128, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0009.

Export Citation

© by Samuel C. Wheeler, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in