Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham

Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Deleuze and Heidegger on Truth And Science

Michael James Bennett
Published Online: 2018-09-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0013


Deleuze and Guattari’s manner of distinguishing science from philosophy in their last collaboration What is Philosophy? (1991) seems to imply a hierarchy, according to which philosophy is more adequate to the reality of virtual events than science is. This suggests, in turn, that philosophy has a better claim than science to truth. This paper clarifies Deleuze‘s views about truth throughout his career. Deleuze equivocates over the term, using it in an “originary” and a “derived” sense, probably under the influence of Henri Bergson, who does similarly. Moreover, William James and pragmatism were to Bergson what the early analytic philosophers Frege and Russell are to Deleuze: excessively scientistic foils whose confusions about truth arise as a result of failing to distinguish science from philosophy. By situating Deleuze’s conception of truth in relation to the early Heidegger’s, which it to some extent resembles, the paper concludes by suggesting that, surprisingly, neither kind of truth Deleuze licenses applies to science, while both apply to philosophy. Science is indifferent to truth in the way that some of Deleuze‘s readers have incorrectly wanted to say that he thinks philosophy is.

Keywords: Deleuze; truth; science; adequation; sense; Heidegger


  • Allen, Barry. Truth in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Allen, Barry. “The Use of Useless Knowledge: Bergson Against the Pragmatists.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43, no. 1 (2013): 37-59.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Allen, Barry. “The Deleuze-Rorty Pas de deux.” In Deleuze and Pragmatism, edited by Sean Bowden, Simone Bignall, and Paul Patton, 163-79. New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by W. D. Ross. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Beistegui, Miguel. Truth and Genesis: Philosophy as Differential Ontology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Bennett, Michael James. Deleuze and Ancient Greek Physics: The Image of Nature. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Bennett, Michael James. “Deleuze, Developmental Systems Theory, and the Philosophy of Nature.” In Deleuze and Evolutionary Theory, edited by Michael J. Bennett and Tano Posteraro. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Bergson, Henri. The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by Mabelle L. Andison. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Bergson, Henri. “On the Pragmatism of William James: Truth and Reality.” In Key Writings, edited by John Mullarkey and KeithGoogle Scholar

  • Ansell Pearson, 267-73. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Bergson, Henri. “Bergson-James Correspondence.” In Key Writings, edited by John Mullarkey and Keith Ansell Pearson, 357-65. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Boundas, Constantin V. “Martin Heidegger.” In Deleuze’s Philosophical Lineage, edited by Graham Jones and Jon Roffe, 321-38. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Chase, James and Jack Reynolds. “The Fate of Transcendental Reasoning in Contemporary Philosophy.” In Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides, edited by Jack Reynolds et al., 27-52. New York: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Dahlstrom, Daniel O. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

  • De Landa, Manuel. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. New York: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Bergsonism. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. New York: Zone Books, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Translated by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations, 1972-1990. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Proust and Signs: The Complete Text. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Continuum, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. What is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchill. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “On Sense and Reference.” In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Translated by Max Black and Peter Geach, 56-78. New York. Blackwell, 1952.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. “On the Essence of Truth.” In Pathmarks, edited by William McNeill, 136-54. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Heidegger: Basic Writings, edited by David Farrell Krell, 143-212. New York: Harper Collins, 1993.Google Scholar

  • James, William. Pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allan W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Lambert, Gregg. The Non-Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. New York: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Translated by R.J. Hollingdale and Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Penguin Classics, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “Vagueness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1, no. 2 (1923): 84-92.Google Scholar

  • Skirke, Christian. “Tugendhat’s Idea of Truth.” European Journal of Philosophy 22, no. 4 (2016): 831-54.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, Daniel W. “Deleuze’s Concept of the Virtual and the Critique of the Possible.” Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 9 (2009): 34-43.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Daniel W. “Analytics: On the Becoming of Concepts.” In Essays on Deleuze, 122-45. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Somers-Hall, Henry. “Sartre and the Virtual: A Deleuzian Interpretation of The Transcendence of the Ego.” Philosophy Today 50 (2006): 126-32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stengers, Isabelle. “Deleuze and Guattari’s Last Enigmatic Message.” Angelaki 10, no. 2 (2005): 151-67.Google Scholar

  • Tugendhat, Ernst. “Heidegger’s Idea of Truth.” In The Heidegger Controversy, edited by Richard Wolin, 247-63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Voss, Daniela. Conditions of Thought: Deleuze and the Transcendental Ideas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Voss, Daniela. “Deleuze’s Rethinking of the Notion of Sense.” Deleuze Studies 7, no. 1 (2013): 1-25.Google Scholar

  • Widder, Nathan. “John Duns Scotus.” In Deleuze’s Philosophical Lineage, edited by Graham Jones and Jon Roffe, 27-43. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Wrathall, Mark. “The Conditions of Truth in Heidegger and Davidson.” The Monist 82, no. 2 (1999): 304 -23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wrathall, Mark. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-28

Accepted: 2018-08-16

Published Online: 2018-09-14

Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 173–190, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0013.

Export Citation

© by Michael James Bennett, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in