Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Heidegger, the Given, and the Second Nature of Entities

Graham Bounds
Published Online: 2018-10-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0019

Abstract

In this paper I draw from Martin Heidegger’s phenomenology of the 1920s to outline some basic features of his theory of intentionality that I believe have not been fully appreciated or utilized, and that allow for both novel and fruitful interventions in questions about meaning, the relationship between mind and the world, and epistemic justification, principally as they appear in John McDowell’s synoptic project in Mind and World. I argue that while elements of McDowell’s picture are ultimately unsatisfying and problematic, much of his conceptual framework can and should be put into dialogue with Heidegger’s, and that in so doing we make available powerful resources for amending the McDowellian account. Moreover, these emendations have attractive implications for his distinctive desiderata. In particular, they provide original conceptions of normativity’s place in nature, of the boundaries of the space of reasons, and of the relationship between the answerability of thought both to the world and to human beings as a rational community.

Keywords: McDowell; Sellars; interpretation; conceptualism; realism; pragmatism; intentionality; disclosure; phenomenology; meaning

References

  • Blattner, William. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

  • BonJour, Laurence. “The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 30:5 (1976), 281-312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carman, Taylor. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Carman, Taylor. “Was Heidegger a Linguistic Idealist?” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 45:2 (2002), 205-215.Google Scholar

  • Dahlstrom, Daniel. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Dahlstrom, Daniel. “Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications.” The Review of Metaphysics, 47:4(1994), 775-795.Google Scholar

  • Denker, Alfred. “Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time: A Carefully Planned Accident?” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time. Edited by Mark A. Wrathall, 54-83. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • deVries, Willem A. Wilfrid Sellars. New York, NY: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Dreyfus, Hubert. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Golob, Sacha. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom, and Normativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Gregor, Brian. “Formal Indication, Philosophy, and Theology: Bonhoeffer’s Critique of Heidegger.” Faith and Philosophy, 24:2 (2007), 185-202.Google Scholar

  • Guignon, Charles. “Being as Appearing: Retrieving the Greek Experience of Phusis.” In A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics. Edited by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt, 34-56. London, UK: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Guignon, Charles. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Haugeland, John. “The Intentionality All-Stars.” In Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, 127-170. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Haugeland, John. “Letting Be.” In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Edited by Joseph Rouse, 167-178. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Haugeland, John. “Truth and Rule-Following.” In Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, 305-361. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Translated by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. The Metaphysics Foundations of Logic. Translated by Michael Heim. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Off the Beaten Track. Translated and edited by Julian Young and KennethGoogle Scholar

  • Haynes, 1-56. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiations into Phenomenological Research. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. “Seminar in Zähringen.” In Four Seminars. Translated by Andrew Mitchell and Francois Raffoul, 63-84. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Kisiel, Theodore. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Kisiel, Theodore. Heidegger’s Way of Thought: Critical and Interpretive Signposts. New York, NY: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Lafont, Cristina. Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Translated by Graham Harman. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Livingston, Paul. The Logic of Being: Realism, Truth, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

  • McDowell, John. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given.” In Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars, 256-272. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • McDowell, John. “Comments.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 31:3 (2000), 330-43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

  • McDowell, John. “Responses.” In John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature. Edited by Jakob Lindgaard, 200-267. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar

  • McDowell, John. “Sellars on Perceptual Experience.” In Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars, 256-272. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Okrent, Mark. “On Layer Cakes: Heidegger’s Normative Pragmatism Revisited.” In Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology. Edited by Ondřej Švec and Jakub Čapek, 21-38. New York, NY: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Rorty, Richard. “The Very Idea of Human Answerability to the World: John McDowell’s Version of Empiricism.” In Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3, 138-153. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Rouse, Joseph. Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Sachs, Carl. Intentionality and the Myths of the Given: Between Pragmatism and Phenomenology. New York, NY: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997. van Buren, John. The Young Heidegger: Rumor of the Hidden King. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Wrathall, Mark A. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Wrathall, Mark A. “Heidegger on Human Understanding.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time. Edited by Mark A. Wrathall, 177-200. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-13

Accepted: 2018-08-28

Published Online: 2018-10-23

Published in Print: 2018-10-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 256–274, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0019.

Export Citation

© by Graham Bounds, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in