Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Metaphysical Subject and Logical Space: Solipsism and Singularity in the Tractatus

M. Curtis Allen
Published Online: 2018-10-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0020

Abstract

This essay presents a heterodox reading of the issue of solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (TLP), out of which the whole of the TLP can be re-read. Inspired by, though not dependent on, the themes of virtuality and singularity found in Deleuze’s ‘transcendental empiricism’ (presented as a Wittgensteinian ‘immaculate conception’), Wittgenstein’s concept of ‘logical space’ is here complexly related to the paradoxes of the ‘metaphysical subject’ and ‘solipsism,’ within which the strictures of sense are defined, and through which the logico-pictorial scaffolding of the TLP precipitates its own systematic dissolution. It shows how nonsense envelopes not only not idle chatter, and metaphysical confusion, but sense itself.

Keywords: Deleuze; Wittgenstein; sense; nonsense; phase space; Hintikka; realism; idealism; transcendental; the mystical

References

  • Boltzmann, Ludwig. Lectures on Gas Theory. Trans. Stephen G. Brush. New York: Dover Publications, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Boltzmann, Ludwig. Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems. Trans. Paul Foulkes. Ed. Brian McGuiness. Boston: D. Reidel, 1974.Google Scholar

  • Carnap, Rudolf. The Logical Syntax of Language. Trans. Amethe Smeaton. Peru, IL: Open Court, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Trans. Mark Lester. New York: Columbia UP, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Griffin, James. Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1964.Google Scholar

  • Floyd, Juliet. “The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” Philosophies of Loneliness, 79-108. Ed. Leroy S. Rouner. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998. Online.Google Scholar

  • Hertz, Heinrich. The Principles of Mechanics. Trans. D. E. Jones and J. T. Walley. New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar

  • Hacker, P. M. S. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. London: Oxford UP, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, Kelly. “Darstellungen in the Principles of Mechanics and the Tractatus: The Representation of Objects in Relation in Hertz and Wittgenstein.” Perspectives on Science 10:1 (2002): 28-68.Google Scholar

  • Harré, Rom. “Wittgenstein: Science and Religion.” Philosophy 76:2 (2001), 211 - 237.Google Scholar

  • Hintikka, Jaakko. “On Wittgenstein’s ‘Solipsism’.” Mind 67:265 (1958), 88-91.Google Scholar

  • Kallenberg, Brad. “Rethinking Fideism Though the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Engineering Outlook.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71:1 (2012), 55-73.Google Scholar

  • Kenny, Anthony. Wittgenstein. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 2006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nolte, David D. “The Tangled Tale of Phase Space.” Physics Today 63:4 (2010), 33-38.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Jonathan Cape, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Pârvu, Ilie. “‘Meine Grundgedanke ist…’ The Structural Theory of Representation as the Metaphysics of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.” Synthese 129:2 (2001), 259-274.Google Scholar

  • Pears, D. F. “Wittgenstein’s Treatment of Solipsism in the Tractatus.” Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana De Filosofía 6:16/17(1972), 57-84.Google Scholar

  • Pihlström, Sami. “A Solipsist in a Real World.” Dialectica 50:4 (2005), 275-90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swoyer, Chris. “Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning.” Synthese 87:3 (1991), 449-508.Google Scholar

  • Tang, Hao. “Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61:244 (2011), 598-607.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Jason. The Facts in Logical Space: A Tractarian Ontology. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Mark. “Wittgenstein: Physica sunt, Non Leguntur.” Philosophical Topics 25:2 (1997), 289-316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weisstein, Eric W. “Singularity.” MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource. Online. 22 Apr. 2017. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Singularity.html.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Notebooks, 1914-1916: 2nd Edition. Ed. G. H. v. Wright. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Chicago: U. Chicago, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden [and F. P. Ramsey]. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul, 1922.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-17

Accepted: 2018-09-20

Published Online: 2018-10-30

Published in Print: 2018-10-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 277–289, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0020.

Export Citation

© by M. Curtis Allen, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in