Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Meinong’s Multifarious Being and Russell’s Ontological Variable: Being in Two Object Theories across Traditions at the Turn of the 20th Century

Ivory Pribram-Day
Published Online: 2018-11-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0023

Abstract

This paper discusses the problems of an ontological value of the variable in Russell’s philosophy. The variable is essential in Russell’s theory of denotation, which among other things, purports to prove Meinongian being outside of subsistence and existence to be logically unnecessary. I argue that neither Russell’s epistemology nor his ontology can account for the ontological value of the variable without running into qualities of Meinongian being that Russell disputed. The problem is that the variable cannot be logically grounded by Russell’s theory of denotation. As such, in so far as being is concerned, Meinong and Russell’s theories are much closer than is typically thought. The arguments are supported with concerns raised by Russell, Frege, and Moore regarding the ontological value of the variable. The problem can be summarised as follows: the variable is the fundamental denoting-position of a formal theory that is meant to explain the structure of the ontological. If such a formal theory is meant to ground the ontological, then the formal must also represent the actual structure of the ontological. Yet the variable, the fundamental symbol of denotation in a theory that defines objects, is ontologically indefinable.

Keywords: Object Theory; Philosophy of Language; History of Analytic Philosophy; Logic; Theory of Denotation

References

  • Albertazzi, Liliana, Dale Jacqette and Roberto Poli. “Meinong in His and Our Times.” In The School of Alexius Meinong, edited by Liliana Albertazzi, Dale Jacquette and Roberto Poli, 3-48. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Benoist, Jocelyn and Markus Gabriel. Talk presented to Philosophie et Psychoanalyse, Paris: Université Paris 1 Panthéon, February 3rd, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. “Meinong, Alexius (1853-1920).” Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by D. M. Borchert. 2nd ed. (2006), Vol. 6, Detroit: Macmillan, 1967.Google Scholar

  • Findlay, John N. Meinong’s Theory of Objects. London: Oxford University Press, 1933.Google Scholar

  • Frege, Gottlob. “Begriffschrift: A Formula Language, Modeled Upon that of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought.” In Frege and Godel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic, edited and translated by Jean Van Heijenoort, 1-81. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1912.Google Scholar

  • Grattan-Guiness, Ivor. “Bertrand Russell on his paradox and the multiplicative axiom. An unpublished letter to Philip Jourdain.” Journal of Philosophical Logic. 6:2 (1972), 103-110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell’s Critique of Meinong’s Theory of Objects.” Grazer Philosophische Studien. 25 (1985-86), 375-401.Google Scholar

  • Grossmann, Reinhart. Meinong. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar

  • Hylton, Peter. “Russell’s Substitutional Theory.” Synthese. 45:1 (1980), 1-31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lambert, Karel. Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong’s Theory of Objects and its Significance in Contemporary Philosophica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Marek, Johann. “Alexius Meinong.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2009 <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meinong/>.Google Scholar

  • Meinong, Alexius. “The Theory of Objects.” In Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, edited by Roderick M. Chisholm, translated by Isaac Levi, D.B. Terrell, and Roderick M Chisholm, 76-117. Glencoe: Free Press, 1904.Google Scholar

  • Meinong, Alexius. “Object of Higher Order and Their Relationship to Internal Perception.” In Alexius Meinong on Objects of Higher Order and Husserl’s Phenomenology, translated by Marie Luise Schubert, 137-208. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978.Google Scholar

  • Meinong, Alexius. Über Annehmen: Zweite Auflage. Leibzig, Der Universität Graz, 1910.Google Scholar

  • Meinong, Alexius.“Über Gegenstandstheorie.” In Untersuchungen Zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, 1-50. Leibzig: Der Universität Graz, 1904.Google Scholar

  • Parsons, Terence. “Are There Nonexistent Objects?” American Philosophical Quarterly. 19:12 (Oct 1982), 365-371.Google Scholar

  • Pasniczek, Jacek. The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic. Dordrecht, London, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Rapaport, William. “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox.” Noûs. 12: 2 (1978), 153-180.Google Scholar

  • Routley, Richard (Richard Sylvan). Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond. An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items, Canberra: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, 1980.Google Scholar

  • Routley, Richard and Valerie Routley. “Rehabilitating Meinong’s theory of objects”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie.27:104/105 (1973), 224-254.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 11 (1910), 108-28.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell: Foundations of Logic 1903-1905, edited by Alasdair Urquhart. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “Classes.” In Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell: Foundations of Logic 1903-1905, edited by Alasdair Urquhart, 3-37. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions.” In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell 4: Foundations of Logic 1903-1905, edited by Alasdair Urquhart, 431-474. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “My Mental Development.” In The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, edited by Robert E. Egner and Lester E. Denonn. Oxon, Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “On Denoting.” Mind. 14:56 (1905), 479-493.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “On Fundamentals.” In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell 4: Foundations of Logic 1903-1905, edited by Alasdair Urquhart, 359-413. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “On the Nature of Acquaintance. II. Neutral Monism.” The Monist 24:2 (1914), 161-87.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. “On the Relations of Universals and Particulars.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series 12 (1911), 1-24.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. Principles of Mathematics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1903.Google Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. The problems of philosophy. London: Oxford University Press, 1912.Google Scholar

  • Simons, Peter. “Logic in the Brentano School.” In The School Franz Brentano, edited by M. Libardi, Roberto Poli, Liliana Albertazzi. Netherlands: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Smiley, Timothy. “The Theory of Descriptions”. Studies in the Philosophy of Logic and Knowledge, edited by John MacDowell. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Janet Farrell. “The Russell-Meinong Debate.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45:3 (1985), 305-350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strawson, P.F. “On Referring”. Mind. 59:235 (1950), 320-344.Google Scholar

  • Suter, Ronald. “Russell’s Refutation of Meinong in ‘On Denoting’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 27:4 (1967), 512-516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-25

Accepted: 2018-09-30

Published Online: 2018-11-08

Published in Print: 2018-10-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 310–326, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0023.

Export Citation

© by Ivory Pribram-Day, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in