Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Assessing the Intellectual Value of New Genre Public Art

Elisa Caldarola
Published Online: 2019-01-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0003

Abstract

Suzanne Lacy introduced the term ‘New Genre Public Art’ (NGPA) to refer to art practices that depart from those traditional of public art (such as installing works in parks and plazas) and focus instead on the direct engagement of artists with audiences to deal with pressing socio-political issues. In this paper, I argue that some works of NGPA should be valued for the intellectual value grounded in their artistic features, not dissimilarly to works of conceptual art. In developing my argument, I take distance from Vid Simoniti’s recent account of ‘Socially Engaged Art’, offer a thorough analysis of Thomas Hirschhorn’s Bataille Monument (2002) and Kathrin Bohm’s and Stefan Saffer’s Mobile Porch (1999), and submit that both such works qualify as good works of NGPA.

Keywords: aesthetics; philosophy; art in the public sphere; public art; dialogic art; public sphere; public engagement; temporary art; durational approaches to public art; Habermas

References

  • Abell, Catharine. “Genre, Interpretation and Evaluation”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 115:1 (2015), 25-40.Google Scholar

  • Bishop, Claire. Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Böhm, Kathrin. “Public works”. In Contemporary Art. From Studio to Situation, edited by Claire Doherty, 162-167. London: Black Dog, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Cray, Wesley. “Conceptual Art, Ideas, and Ontology”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 72:2 (2018), 235-245.Google Scholar

  • Dodd, Julian. “The Ontology of Conceptual Art. Against the Idea Idea”. In Art, Mind, and Narative. Themes from the Work of Peter Goldie, edited by Julian Dodd, 241-260. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Goldie, Peter and Schellekens, Elisabeth. Who’s Afraid of Conceptual Art? New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Hirschhorn, Thomas. “Bataille Monument”. In Contemporary Art. From Studio to Situation, edited by Claire Doherty, 134-147. London: Black Dog, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Lacy, Suzanne. Mapping the Terrain. New Genre Public Art. Winnipeg: Bay Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Simoniti, Vid. “Assessing Socially Engaged Art”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 76:1 (2018), 71-82.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-11-01

Accepted: 2018-11-08

Published Online: 2019-01-18

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 22–29, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0003.

Export Citation

© by Elisa Caldarola, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in