Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham

Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Obstinate Real: Barad, Escobar, and Object-Oriented Ontology

Michael Feichtinger
Published Online: 2019-06-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0009


Relational ontologies that postulate the primacy of relations over their relata may seem like a contrary and incompatible approach to object-oriented ontology (OOO). Therefore, this paper aims to clarify the relationship between Barad’s and Escobar’s relational ontologies and Harman’s OOO by comparing and contrasting the relative coherences between them. After outlining the central assumptions of the different accounts, I discuss the problems of relational ontologies with regard to several ethical, political, and posthumanist issues. I argue that OOO is able to avoid their pitfalls without rejecting the major benefits of relational ontologies. After a critique of the pluralization of worlds within relational ontologies, I argue for the rejection of the concept of world(s) in favor of understanding space and time as emerging from polar tensions within the quadruple objects. Consequently, this highlights the potential of OOO to encounter the Anthropocene beyond scientific realism and to account for the plurality of reality without granting any hegemonic access to it. This paper, therefore, argues for a conceptualization of ontological difference without one or many worlds.

Keywords: speculative realism; new materialism; Barad; One-World World; Harman; Escobar; critical posthumanism; Meillassoux; postcolonial studies; Anthropocene


  • Ainsworth, Peter Mark, “What is ontic structural realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010), 50-57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barad, Karen, “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” parallax 20:3 (2014), 168-187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Bertet, Patrice et al. “A complementarity experiment with an interferometer at the quantum-classical boundary.” Nature, 411:10 (2001), 166-170.Google Scholar

  • Bonneuil, Christophe. “The geological turn: narratives of the Anthropocene.” In The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis. Rethinking modernity in a new epoch, edited by Clive Hamilton/Christoph Bonneuil/François Gemenne, 17-31. London/New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Caro, Mario De. “Zwei Spielarten des Realismus.” In Der Neue Realismus, edited by Markus Gabriel, 19-32. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2015.Google Scholar

  • DeLanda, Manuel & Harman, Graham. The Rise of Realism. Malden, MA: Polity, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Dussel, Enrique. Der Gegendiskurs der Moderne. Trans. Christoph Dittrich. Wien/Berlin: Turia + Kant, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Escobar, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autononmy, and the Making of the Worlds. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Escobar, Arturo. “Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial Struggles and the Ontological Dimension of the Epistemologies of the South.” Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 11:1 (2015), 11-32.Google Scholar

  • French, Steven & Ladyman, James. “Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure.” Synthese 136:1 (2003), 31-56.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Bells and Whistles. More Speculative Realism. Winchester/Washington: Zero Books, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology. A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. “On the Horror of Phenomenology: Lovecraft and Husserl.” In Collapse IV. Philosophical Research and Development, edited by Robin Mackay, 333-364. Oxford: Urbanomic, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. “On Vicarious Causation.” In Collapse II. Philosophical Research and Development, edited by Robin Mackay, 171-205. Oxford: Urbanomic, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Winchester/Washington: Zero Books, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. The Third Table / Der dritte Tisch. Berlin/Stuttgart: Hatje Cantz, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.Google Scholar

  • Hollbrand, Martin et al. (Ed.). The Ontological Turn. An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Ladyman, James. “What is structural realism?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29:3 (1998), 409-424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Law, John. “What’s Wrong with a One-World World.” Online: http://heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011WhatsWrong-WithAOneWorldWorld.pdf [last access: 16.11.2018], 2011.

  • Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude. An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. Ray Brassier. London/New York: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Morton, Timothy. Humankind. Solidarity with Nonhuman People. London/New York: Verso, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Povinelli, Elizabeth A. Geontologies. A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Putnam, Hilary. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. In Other Worlds. Essays in Cultural Politics. New York/London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-01-28

Accepted: 2019-04-18

Published Online: 2019-06-03

Published in Print: 2019-01-01

Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 86–97, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0009.

Export Citation

© 2019 Michael Feichtinger, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in