Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Problem of Causality in Object-Oriented Ontology

C.J. Davies
Published Online: 2019-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0010

Abstract

Object-oriented ontologists understand relations of cause and effect to be sensory or aesthetic in nature, not involving direct interaction between objects. Four major arguments are used to defend an indirect view of causation: 1) that there are analogies between perception and causation, 2) that the indirect view can account for cases of causation which a direct view cannot, 3) an Occasionalist argument that direct interaction would make causation impossible, and 4) that the view simply fits better with object-oriented ontology’s own premises. However, each argument is fallacious or otherwise unconvincing. The first affirms the consequent. The second fails because the relevant cases can easily be accounted for with a direct view. The third makes false assumptions about the relation between parts and wholes. And the fourth can also be used to argue against object-oriented ontology. Many of these problems can be traced to the methodological aspects of object-oriented ontology and might be avoided by emphasizing the role of non-argumentative justification in metaphysics.

Keywords: metaphysics; causality; realism; objects

References

  • Betsky, Aaron. “The Triple O Play.” Architect. 18 October 2017. Accessed March 4, 2019. https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/the-triple-o-play_o.

  • Bryant, Levi R. The Democracy of Objects. London: Open Humanities Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Cogburn, Jon. “Aesthetics as First Philosophy: Sense-Making after Speculative Realism.” Unpublished draft. Accessed 20 April 2019. https://www.academia.edu/22685785/Aesthetics_as_First_Philosophy_Sense_Making_After_Speculative_Realism.

  • Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. What is Philosophy?, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Eastham, Ben. “OOO! The Return to Objects.” Elephant, vol. 31 (2018). Accessed February 7, 2019. https://elephant.art/returnof-objects/.

  • Ennis, Paul J. “Interview with Ian Bogost” in Post-Continental Voices: Selected Interviews. Alresford: Zero Books, 2010, 48-63.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Circus Philosophicus. London: Zero Books, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Malden: Polity, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Alresford: Zero Books, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Alresford: Zero Books, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Morton, Timothy. Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality. London: Open Humanities Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Nagarjuna. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way, trans. Jay L. Garfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Putnam, Hilary. Words and Life, ed. James Conant. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, (1979), 335-341.Google Scholar

  • Schaffer, Jonathan. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review, vol. 119, no. 1, (2010), 31-76.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-03-21

Accepted: 2019-05-28

Published Online: 2019-06-15

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 98–107, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0010.

Export Citation

© 2019 C.J. Davies et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in