Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Towards More Realistic Modeling of Linguistic Color Categorization

José Pedro Correia / Radek Ocelák
Published Online: 2019-08-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0013

Abstract

The ways in which languages have come to divide the visible spectrum with their color terminology, in both their variety and the apparent universal tendencies, are still largely unexplained. Building on recent work in modeling color perception and categorization, as well as the theory of signaling games, we incrementally construct a color categorization model which combines perceptual characteristics of individual agents, game-theoretic signaling interaction of these agents, and the probability of observing particular colors as an environmental constraint. We also propose a method of transparent evaluation against the data gathered in the World Color Survey. The results show that the model’s predictive power is comparable to the current state of the art. Additionally, we argue that the model we suggest is superior in terms of motivation of the principles involved, and that its explanatory relevance with respect to color categorization in languages is therefore higher. Our results suggest that the universal tendencies of color categorization cannot be explained solely in terms of the shape of the color space induced by our perceptual apparatus. We believe that only by taking the heterogeneity of the phenomenon seriously can we acquire a deeper understanding of why color categorization takes the forms we observe across languages.

Keywords: color categorization; color naming; World Color Survey; signaling games

References

  • Alexander, J. McKenzie, Brian Skyrms, and Sandy L. Zabell. “Inventing New Signals.” Dynamic Games and Applications, 2:1 (2012), 129–45.Google Scholar

  • Baronchelli, Andrea, Tao Gong, Andrea Puglisi, and Vittorio Loreto. “Modeling the Emergence of Universality in Color Naming Patterns.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, (2010), 2403–7.Google Scholar

  • Baylor, Denis. “Colour Mechanisms of the Eye.” In Colour: Art and Science, edited by Trevor Lamb and Janine Bourriau, 103–26. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Belpaeme, Tony. “Color Category Learning in Naming-Game Simulations.” Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology. (2014), 1–5.Google Scholar

  • Berlin, Brent, and Paul Kay. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar

  • Cook, Richard, Paul Kay, and Terry Regier. “WCS Data Archives.” 2013 (accessed January). URL: http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/wcs/data.html.

  • Correia, José Pedro. “COM model and data analysis scripts,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1428652.Crossref

  • Correia, José Pedro. “COM1 results,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1411267.Crossref

  • Correia, José Pedro. “COM2 results,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1411268.Crossref

  • Correia, José Pedro. “COM3 results,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1411269.Crossref

  • Correia, José Pedro. “RKeK results,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1411252.Crossref

  • Correia, José Pedro. “RKK results,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1411250.Crossref

  • Correia, José Pedro. “WCS majority maps,” July 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1411240.Crossref

  • Dedrick, Don. Naming the Rainbow: Colour Language, Colour Science, and Culture. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Dedrick, Don. “Explanation(s) and the Patterning of Basic Colour Words Across Languages and Speakers.” In Progress in Colour Studies, Vol. Ii: Psychological Aspects, edited by Nicola Pitchford and Carole P. Biggam, 1–11. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Dowman, Mike. “Explaining Color Term Typology with an Evolutionary Model.” Cognitive Science. 31:1 (2007), 99–132.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Fairchild, Mark. Color Appearance Models. The Wiley-IS&T Series in Imaging Science and Technology. Chichester, England: Wiley, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Fraley, Chris, Adrian Raftery, and Luca Scrucca. Mclust: Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Density Estimation. 2014. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mclust.

  • Franke, Michael, Gerhard Jäger, and Robert van Rooij. “Vagueness, Signaling and Bounded Rationality.” In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2010, edited by Takashi Onoda, Daisuke Bekki, and Eric McCready, 45–59. Springer, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Franke, Michael, and José Pedro Correia. “Vagueness and Imprecise Imitation in Signalling Games.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 69:4 (2018), 1037–67.Google Scholar

  • Franke, Michael, and Elliott Wagner. “Game Theory and the Evolution of Meaning.” Language and Linguistics Compass. 8:9 (2014), 359–72.Google Scholar

  • Huttegger, Simon. “How Much Rationality Do We Need to Explain Conventions?” Philosophy Compass. 9:1 (2014), 11–21.Google Scholar

  • Jäger, Gerhard. “Natural Color Categories Are Convex Sets.” In Logic, Language and Meaning - 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, December 16-18, 2009, Revised Selected Papers, edited by Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager, and Katrin Schulz, 11–20. 2010.Google Scholar

  • Jäger, Gerhard, and Robert van Rooij. “Language Structure: Psychological and Social Constraints.” Synthese. 159 (2007), 99–130.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, Kimberly. “Where in the World Color Survey is the support for the Hering primaries as the basis for color categorization?” In Color Ontology and Color Science, edited by Jonathan Cohen and Mohan Matthen, 179–202. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, Kimberly, and Natalia Komarova. “Evolutionary Models of Color Categorization. I. Population Categorization Systems Based on Normal and Dichromat Observers.” Journal of the Optical Society of America. 26 (2009), 1414–23.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, Kimberly, and Natalia Komarova. “Evolutionary Models of Color Categorization. II. Realistic Observer Models and Population Heterogeneity.” Journal of the Optical Society of America. 26 (2009), 1424–36.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, Kimberly, and Roy G. D’Andrade. “It’s Not Really Red, Green, Yellow, Blue: An Inquiry into Perceptual Color Space.” In Color Categories in Thought and Language, edited by Clyde Laurence Hardin and Luisa Maffi, 295–319. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Kallens, Pablo Andrés Contreras, Rick Dale, and Paul E. Smaldino. “Cultural Evolution of Categorization.” Cognitive Systems Research. 52 (2018), 765-774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kay, Paul. “Synchronic Variability and Diachronic Change in Basic Color Terms.” Language in Society. 4 (1975), 257–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kay, Paul, and Luisa Maffi. “Color Appearance and the Emergence and Evolution of Basic Color Lexicons.” American Anthropologist. 101 (1999), 743–60.Google Scholar

  • Kay, Paul, and Chad McDaniel. “The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Terms.” Language. 54 (1978), 610–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kay, Paul, and Terry Regier. “Resolving the Question of Color Naming Universals.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (2003), 9085–9.Google Scholar

  • Kay, Paul, Brent Berlin, Luisa Maffi, William R. Merrifield, and Richard Cook. The World Color Survey. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language; Information, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Kay, Paul, and Richard Cook. “World Color Survey.” In Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology, edited by Ming Ronnier Luo, 1265–71. New York: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Komarova, Natalia, Kimberly Jameson, and Louis Narens. “Evolutionary Models of Color Categorization Based on Discrimination.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 51:6 (2007), 359–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuehni, Rolf. “CIEDE2000: Milestone, or Final Answer?” COLOR Research and Application. 27 (2002), 126–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenneberg, Eric, and John Roberts. “The Language of Experience: A Study in Methodology.” In Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, Memoir 13. Baltimore: Waverly Press, 1956.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, David. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

  • Loreto, Vittorio, Animesh Mukherjee, and Francesca Tria. “On the Origin of the Hierarchy of Color Names.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (2012), 6819–24.Google Scholar

  • Lucy, John. “The Linguistics of ‘Color’.” In Color Categories in Thought and Language, edited by Clyde Laurence Hardin and Luisa Maffi, 320–46. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, John. “Colour in Language.” In Colour: Art and Science, edited by Trevor Lamb and Janine Bourriau, 175–93. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Masaoka, Kenichiro, Roy Berns, Mark Fairchild, and Farhad Moghareh Abed. “Number of discernible object colors is a conundrum.” Journal of the Optical Society of America. 30:2 (2013), 264–77.Google Scholar

  • Mollon, John. “Seeing Colour.” In Colour: Art and Science, edited by Trevor Lamb and Janine Bourriau, 127–50. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

  • O’Connor, Cailin. “The Evolution of Vagueness.” Erkenntnis. 79:4 (2014), 707–27.Google Scholar

  • Ocelák, Radek. “Carving up the Rainbow: How to Model Linguistic Categorization of Color.” Master’s thesis, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Ocelák, Radek. “The Myth of Unique Hues.” Topoi. 34:2 (2015), 513–22.Google Scholar

  • Ocelák, Radek. “‘Categorical Perception’ and Linguistic Categorization of Color.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 7:1 (2016), 55–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olmos, Adriana, and Frederick Kingdom. “A Biologically Inspired Algorithm for the Recovery of Shading and Reflectance Images.” Perception. 33:12 (2004), 1463–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Jungkyu, Sean Tauber, Kimberly Jameson, and Louis Narens. “The Evolution of Shared Concepts in Changing Populations.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology. (2018), 1-20.Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Rand, William. “Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods.” Journal of the American Statistical Association. 66:336 (1971), 846–50.Google Scholar

  • Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, and Richard Cook. “Focal Colors Are Universal After All.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (2005), 8386–91.Google Scholar

  • Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, and Naveen Khetarpal. “Color Naming Reflects Optimal Partitions of Color Space.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (2007), 1436–41.Google Scholar

  • Regier, Terry, Charles Kemp, and Paul Kay. “Word Meanings Across Languages Support Efficient Communication.” In The Handbook of Language Emergence, edited by Brian MacWhinney and William O’Grady. Hoboken, Wiley, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Roberson, Debi, Jules Davidoff, Ian Davies, and Laura R. Shapiro. “Color Categories: Evidence for the Cultural Relativity Hypothesis.” Cognitive Psychology. 50 (2005), 378–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberson, Debi, Ian Davies, and Jules Davidoff. “Color Categories Are Not Universal: Replications and Evidence Form a Stone-Age Culture.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 126 (2000), 369–98.Google Scholar

  • Saunders, Barbara. “Revisiting Basic Color Terms.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 6 (2000), 81–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saunders, Barbara. “Towards a New Topology of Color.” In Anthropology of Colour: Interdisciplinary Multilevel Modeling, edited by Robert E. MacLaury, Galina V. Paramei, and Don Dedrick, 467–79. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Saunders, Barbara, and Jaap van Brakel. “Are There Nontrivial Constraints on Colour Categorization?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20 (1997), 167–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saunders, Barbara, and Jaap van Brakel. “Colour: An Exosomatic Organ?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20 (1997), 212–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skyrms, Brian. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Skyrms, Brian. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Stalnaker, Robert. “Saying and Meaning, Cheap Talk and Credibility.” In Game Theory and Pragmatics, edited by Anton Benz, Gerhard Jäger, and Robert van Rooij, 83–100. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Steels, Luc, and Tony Belpaeme. “Coordinating Perceptually Grounded Categories Through Language: A Case Study for Colour.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 28 (2005), 469–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, Peter D., and Leo B. Jonker. “Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics.” Mathematical Biosciences. (1978), 145–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vinh, Nguyen Xuan, Julien Epps, and James Bailey. “Information Theoretic Measures for Clusterings Comparison: Variants, Properties, Normalization and Correction for Chance.” Journal of Machine Learning Research. 11 (2010), 2837–54.Google Scholar

  • Witzel, Christoph. “Misconceptions About Colour Categories.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology. (2018), 1–42.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-04-25

Accepted: 2019-06-10

Published Online: 2019-08-12

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 160–189, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0013.

Export Citation

© 2019 José Pedro Correia et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in