Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham

Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Signals and Spite in Fluctuating Populations

Rory Smead / Patrick Forber
Published Online: 2019-07-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0014


Spite (in the biological or evolutionary sense) is behavior that harms others at a cost to the actor. The presence of spite in human and animal populations presents an evolutionary puzzle. Recent work has suggested small populations and pre-play signaling can have a significant effect on the evolution of spite. Here, we use computational methods to explore these factors in fluctuating populations that may go extinct. We find that the presence of spite can make a population significantly more likely to go extinct, but that this does not preclude the possibility of spite reliably evolving. Additionally, we find that the stochastic effects of small fluctuating populations allow for the evolution and predominance of signal-mediated conditional spite across a wide range of conditions. These results suggest that directed harm, even if costly, can play a significant early role in the evolution of social behaviors and this provides a possible origin for punishment.

Keywords: Spite; Game Theory; Signaling; Conditional Behavior; Finite Populations; Punishment


  • Alexander, Jason McKenzie. The Structural Evolution of Morality. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Barrett, Jeffrey A. and Brian Skyrms. “Self-assembling games.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 68:2 (2017), 329-353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borges, Jorge Luis. Collected fictions. Penguin Books New York, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Robert, Herbert Gintis, Samuel Bowles, and Peter J. Richerson. “The evolution of altruistic punishment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100:6 (2003), 3531-3535.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. “Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups.” Ethology and sociobiology. 13:3 (1992), 171-195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forber, P and R Smead. “The evolution of fairness through spite.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281:1780 (2014), 20132439.Google Scholar

  • Forber, Patrick, and Rory Smead. “An evolutionary paradox for prosocial behavior.” The Journal of Philosophy. 111:3 (2014), 151-166.Google Scholar

  • Forber, Patrick, and Rory Smead. “The Evolution of Spite, Recognition, and Morality.” Philosophy of Science. 83:5 (2016), 884-896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • West, Stuart A., and Andy Gardner. “Altruism, spite, and greenbeards.” Science. 327:5971 (2010), 1341-1344.Google Scholar

  • Grim, Patrick, Robert Rosenberger, Adam Rosenfeld, Brian Anderson, and Robb E. Eason. “How simulations fail.” Synthese. 190:12 (2013), 2367-2390.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, William D. “The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.” Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7:1 (1964),1-16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, William, D. “Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model.” Nature. 228:5277 (1970), 1218-1220.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, W D. “Selection of selfish and altruistic behavior in some extreme models.” In Narrow Roads of Gene Land: The Collected Papers of W. D. Hamilton Volume 1: Evolution of Social Behaviour, 198–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

  • Hawlena, Hadas, Farrah Bashey, and Curtis M. Lively. “The evolution of spite: Population structure and bacteriocin-mediated antagonism in two natural populations of Xenorhabdus bacteria.” Evolution. 64:11 (2010), 3198-3204.Google Scholar

  • Huttegger, Simon M. and Kevin J. S. Zollman “Methodology in biological game theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 64:3 (2003), 637-658.Google Scholar

  • Inglis, R. Fredrik, Andy Gardner, Pierre Cornelis, and Angus Buckling. “Spite and virulence in the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106:14 (2009), 5703-5707.Google Scholar

  • Jensen, Keith. “Punishment and spite, the dark side of cooperation.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365:1553 (2010), 2635-2650.Google Scholar

  • Lehmann, Laurent, Marcus W. Feldman, and François Rousset. “On the evolution of harming and recognition in finite panmictic and infinite structured populations.” Evolution. 63:11 (2009). 2896-2913.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marlowe, Frank W., J. Colette Berbesque, Clark Barrett, Alexander Bolyanatz, Michael Gurven, and David Tracer. “The ‘spiteful’ origins of human cooperation.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 278:1715 (2010). 2159-2164.Google Scholar

  • Matthewson, John, and Michael Weisberg. “The structure of tradeoffs in model building.” Synthese. 170:1 (2009). 169-190.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • McAuliffe, Katherine, Peter R. Blake, and Felix Warneken. “Children reject inequity out of spite.” Biology letters. 10:12 (2014). 20140743.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nakao, Hisashi, and Edouard Machery. “The evolution of punishment.” Biology & Philosophy. 27:6 (2012), 833-850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, Scott K. “Anti-social and social behaviour of adolescent Yellow-rumped Caciques (Icterinae: Cacicus cela).” Animal Behaviour. 36:5 (1988), 1482-1495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robson, Arthur J. “Efficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash and the secret handshake.” Journal of theoretical Biology. 144:3 (1990), 379-396.Google Scholar

  • Skyrms, Brian. Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Skyrms, Brian. The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Skyrms, Brian. “Evolution and the social contract.” The Tanner lecture on human values, University of Michigan, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Skyrms, Brian. Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Smead, Rory. “The evolution of cooperation in the centipede game with finite populations.” Philosophy of Science. 75:2 (2008), 157-177.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Smead, Rory, and Patrick Forber. “The coevolution of recognition and social behavior.” Scientific reports. 6 (2016). 25813.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Smead, Rory, and Patrick Forber. “The evolutionary dynamics of spite in finite populations.” Evolution. 67:3 (2013), 698-707. Sterelny, Kim. The evolved apprentice. MIT press, 2012.Google Scholar

  • West, Stuart A., and Andy Gardner. “Altruism, spite, and greenbeards.” Science. 327:5971 (2010), 1341-1344.Google Scholar

  • Zollman, Kevin JS. “Talking to neighbors: The evolution of regional meaning.” Philosophy of Science. 72:1 (2005), 69-85.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-04-30

Accepted: 2019-06-17

Published Online: 2019-07-26

Published in Print: 2019-01-01

Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 137–146, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0014.

Export Citation

© 2019 Rory Smead et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in