Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Atmospheric Whereby: Reflections on Subject and Object

Andreas Rauh
Published Online: 2019-07-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0017

Abstract

Atmospheres constitute an ordinary perceptual phenomenon that can become a new experience, as the former are more than the sum of single-sensory perceptual factors. Drawing on the terminological pair ‘subject’ and ‘object’ and its interdependencies, the atmospheric phenomenon can be approached in an essayistic fashion (and by means of applying an aesthetic focus in the broadest sense). In so doing, it becomes clear that the atmosphere serves as a condition for the emergence as well as actualization of special perception. Based on Gernot Böhme’s research and further studies, specific (ontological) determinants are identified and differentiated according to the definitional facets of the ‘and’, the ‘in-between’ and the ‘whereby’ or ‘in what way’. These considerations demonstrate to what extent perception precedes the separation of subject and object in that the atmospheric ‘whereby’ is responsible for creating tuned spaces and situations. Turning to the objects of perception and their concomitant ecstasies as well as to the subject of perception with its reception helps to clarify which components of an atmosphere work in what way. In this context, methods of exploratory involvement and participation (in the Parcours Commenté but even more so in the Aesthetic Fieldwork) gain in importance in order to explore atmospheres from a lifeworld perspective.

Keywords: atmosphere; aesthetics; subject; object; in-between; ecstasies; reception; phenomenology

References

  • Anderson, Ben.  “Affective atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society. 2, 2 (2009), 77-81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Augoyard, Jean-François. “La construction des atmosphères quotidiennes: l’ordinaire de la culture.” Culture et Recherche. 114-115 (2007-2008), 58-60.Google Scholar

  • Böhme, Gernot. Atmosphäre. Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Böhme, Gernot. Aisthetik. Vorlesungen über Ästhetik als allgemeine Wahrnehmungslehre. München: Fink, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Böhme, Gernot. The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. London/New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. Objektivität. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Griffero, Tonino. Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Huizing, Klaas. “Der Tru(e)man der Mediengesellschaft” In Atmosphäre(n). Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff, edited by Rainer Goetz, Stefan Graupner, 162-174. München: kopäd, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Löw, Martina. Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Menke, Christoph. “Subjektivität” In Ästhetische Grundbegriffe, Bd. 5/7, edited by Karlheinz Barck et al., 734-786. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Pfister, Dieter. Atmosphäre und Ort. Zur Wissenschaft und Praxis des Raumverständnisses und der Raumentwicklung zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Topologie, 1: München, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Pfrang, Agnes, and Rauh, Andreas. “Lernatmosphären” In Handbuch Schweigendes Wissen. Erziehung, Bildung, Sozialisation und Lernen, edited by Anja Kraus et al., 783-792. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Rauh, Andreas. Die besondere Atmosphäre. Ästhetische Feldforschungen. Bielefeld: transcript, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Rauh, Andreas. “In the Clouds: On the Vagueness of Atmospheres” Ambiances [En ligne]. (2017) DOI: 10.4000/ambiances.818CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rauh, Andreas. Concerning Astonishing Atmospheres. Aisthesis, Aura, and Atmospheric Portfolio. Milano: Mimesis International, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Seel, Martin. Ästhetik des Erscheinens. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Thibaud, Jean-Paul. “La méthode des parcours commentés” In L‘espace urbain en methods, edited by Michèle Grosjean, Jean-Paul Thibaud, 79-99. Marseille: Éditions Parenthèses, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Ulber, Marie. Landschaft und Atmosphäre. Künstlerische Übersetzungen. Bielefeld: transcript, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Weidinger, Jürgen. “Designing Atmospheres in Landscape Architecture” In Designing Atmospheres, edited by Jürgen Weidinger, 19-39. Berlin: TU Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-04-05

Accepted: 2019-06-14

Published Online: 2019-07-26

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 147–159, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0017.

Export Citation

© 2019 Andreas Rauh, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in