Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Philosophy

Editor-in-Chief: Harman, Graham


Covered by:
DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
ERIH PLUS

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8875
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Precariousness and Philosophical Critique: Towards an Open-Field Combat with Harman’s OOO

André Arnaut
Published Online: 2019-09-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0024

Abstract

Philosophical critiques are prone to relapse into a sort of entrenchment in which the basic elements of a philosophy are kept from exposure, so that instead of advancing, philosophy easily becomes compartmentalized into specific trends. This article thus seeks the conditions of a non-entrenched, open-field philosophical critique in general and, in particular, of an open-field critique of Harman’s OOO (object-oriented ontology). For that purpose, the idea of precariousness is introduced, which is then confronted with some ideas concerning philosophical critique and practice, in particular those of François Laruelle. Since we can find in Harman’s OOO an outline of what we call here an open-field critique, the field of combat against Harman will be the one concerning the idea of an open field itself.

Keywords: metaphilosophy; critique; metaphysics; flat ontology; non-philosophy; Graham Harman; François Laruelle

References

  • Bensusan, Hilan. Being Up for Grabs: On Speculative Anarcheology. London: Open Humanities Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Bells and Whistles: More Speculative Realism. Winchester: Zero Books, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Dante’s Broken Hammer: The Ethics, Aesthetics, and Metaphysics of Love. London: Repeater Books, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Chicago: Open Court, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. “On Vicarious Causation.” Collapse 2 (2007), 171-205.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: re-press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Winchester: Zero Books, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Chicago: Open Court, 2002. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Winchester: Zero Books, 2010. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: Zero Books, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Laruelle, François. Dictionary of Non-Philosophy. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2013. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

  • Laruelle, François. Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-Philosophy. London: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. “Irréductions.” In Pasteur: Guerre et Paix des Microbes. Paris: La Découverte, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno, Graham Harman, and Peter Erdélyi. The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Winchester: Zero Books, 2011. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. Autrement qu’Être ou Au-delà de l’Essence. The Hague and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.Google Scholar

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. De l’Existence à l’Existant. Paris: Vrin, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Meillassoux, Quentin. Après la Finitude: Essai sur la Nécessité de la Contingence. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2006.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-05-31

Accepted: 2019-08-21

Published Online: 2019-09-18

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Philosophy, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 312–323, ISSN (Online) 2543-8875, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0024.

Export Citation

© 2019 André Arnaut, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in