Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Rhetoric and Reception of John Milbank’s Radical Orthodoxy: Privileging Prejudice in Theology?

Paul Hedges
  • University of Winchester
Published Online: 2014-09-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/opth-2014-0004

Abstract

This paper uses Douglas Pratt’s typology of religious extremism and fundamentalism to argue that John Milbank’s Radical Orthodoxy employs styles of rhetoric and representation of the religious Other that have clear affinities with such ideologies. While clearly demarcating Milbank’s theology from what is normally termed fundamentalism or extremism, the paper shows that nevertheless similar rhetoric and judgements are employed that suggests that his theology is at best unhelpful, and at worst potentially dangerous. Focusing upon Milbank’s early work, the paper suggests that such rhetoric can be found through much of his writings, but notes that a different approach can be detected in his most recent writings. Suggestions for more productive modes of theological encounters with the religious Other are advanced, which suggest how the ideology of Radical Orthodoxy may be in potential sympathy with such ideas.

Keywords: John Milbank; Radical Orthodoxy; extremism; Theology of Religions; Douglas Pratt; religious Other; fundamentalism

References

  • Allen, Charles W. “Radical Orthodoxy in the Parish: OR, Postmodern Critical Augustinianism for Dummies.” Encounter, 64 (2003), 219-29.Google Scholar

  • Almond, Gabriel, Emmanuel Sivan, and R. Scott Appleby. “Fundamentalisms: Genus and Species.” In Fundamentalisms Comprehended, edited by Marty, Martin E. and Scott R. Appleby, 399-424. Volume 5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Appleby, R. Scott. The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence and Reconciliation. Lanham, MA, New York, and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Bauschke, Martin. “Islam: Jesus and Muhammad as Brothers.” In Christian Approaches to Other Faiths, edited by Paul Hedges and Alan Race, 191-210. London, SCM, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Bhogal, Balbinder Singh. “Sikh Dharam and Postcolonialism: Hegel, Religion, and Žižek.” Australian Religion Studies Review, 25:2 (2012), 185-213.Google Scholar

  • Brecht, Maria. Virtue in Dialogue: Belief, Religious Diversity, and Women’s Interreligious Encounter. Princeton theological Monograph Series. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Frank Burch. “Radical Orthodoxy and the Religions of Others.” Encounter, 63:1-2 (2002), 45-53.Google Scholar

  • Cheetham, David. “Liberal Pluralism, Radical Orthodoxy and the Right Tone of Voice.” Sophia, 45:2 (2006), 81-97.Google Scholar

  • Cheetam, David and Cartledge, Mark. “Introduction.” In Intercultural Theology, edited by David Cheetham and Mark Cartledge, 1-10. London: SCM, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Clatworthy, Jonathan. “Introduction” [to Linda Woodhead, “Questionning the Bishops’ Guidance on Same-Sex Marriage.”] Modern Believing, 55:3 (2014), 283-5.Google Scholar

  • Clooney, Francis X. Comparative Theology: Deep Learning Across Religious Borders. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Coco, Angela and Paul Hedges. “Belonging, Behaving, Believing, Becoming: Religion and Identity.” In Controversies in Contemporary Religion, edited by Paul Hedges, 163-190. Volume I. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Cox, James. The Invention of God in Indigenous Societies. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Crockett, Clayton. “Introduction.” In Secular Theology: American radical theological thought edited by Clayton Crockett, 1-9. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

  • D’Costa, Gavin. Christianity and World Religions: Disputed Questions in the Theology of Religions. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

  • D‘Costa, Gavin, ed. Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered: The Myth of a Pluralistic Theology of Religions. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Eck, Diana. Encountering God: A Spiritual Journey from Bozeman to Banaras. Boston: Beacon Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Egnell, Helene. Other Voices: A Study of Christian Feminist Approaches to Religious Plurality East and West. Uppsala: Studia Missionalia Svecana, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Emerson, Michael and David Hartman. “The Rise of Religious Fundamentalism”. Annual Review of Sociology, 32 (2006), 127-44.Google Scholar

  • Firestone, Reuven. “Can Those Chosen by God Dialogue with Others?”. In Contemporary Muslim-Christian Encounters: Diversity, Developments, Dialogues, edited by Paul Hedges. London and New York: Bloomsbury, forthcoming 2015.Google Scholar

  • Fletcher, Jeannine Hill. Monopoly on Salvation?: A Feminist Approach to Religious Pluralism. New York and London: Continuum, 2006.Francisco, Adam S. “Luther’s Knowledge of and Attitude Towards Islam”. In The Routledge Reader in Christian-Muslim Relations, edited by Mona Siddiqui, 129-53. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Hankey, Wayne J. & Hedley, Douglas, eds. Deconstructing Radical Orthodoxy: Postmodern Theology, Rhetoric and Truth Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Heck, Paul L. Common Ground: Islam, Christianity and Religious Pluralism. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Hedges, Paul. “The Theology of Religions Typology Defended: what it can and cannot do”. In Twenty-First Century Theologies of Religions: Retrospection and New Frontiers, edited by Elizabeth Harris, Paul Hedges, and Shanthi Hettiarachchi. Leiden: E. J. Brill, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Hedges, Paul. “Radical Orthodoxy and the Closed Western theological Mind: The Poverty of Radical Orthodoxy in Intercultural and Interreligious Perspective.” In The Poverty of Radical Orthodoxy, edited by Lisa Isherwood and Marko Zlomislic, 119-43. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Hedges, Paul. “Book Review: The Future of Love: Essays in Political Theology. By John Milbank.” The Heythrop Review, 55:3 (2012), 545-8.Google Scholar

  • Hedges, Paul. Controversies in Interreligious Dialogue and the Theology of Religions. London: SCM, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Hedges, Paul. “Is John Milbank’s Radical Orthodoxy a form of Liberal Theology? A Rhetorical Counter.” The Heythrop Journal, 51:5 (2010), 795-818.Google Scholar

  • Hedges, Paul. Preparation and Fulfilment: A History and Study of Fulfiment Theology in Modern British Thought in the Indian Context. Bern and Oxford: Peter Lang, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Hemming, Laurence. “Quod Impossible Est! Aquinas and Radical Orthodoxy.” In Radical Orthodoxy? – A Catholic Enquiry, edited by Laurence Hemming, 76-93. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Hick, John. The Rainbow of Faiths. London: SCM, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Hick, John. An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Hick, John and Paul F. Knitter, eds. The Myth of Christian Uniqueness: Towards a Pluralistic Theology of Religion. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Hyman, Gavin. The Predicament of Postmodern Theology: Radical Orthodoxy or Nihilist Textualism. London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Isherwood, Lisa and Zlomislic, Marko, eds. The Poverty of Radical Orthodoxy. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Janz, Paul D. “Radical Orthodoxy and the New Culture of Obscurantism.” Modern Theology, 20 (2004), 362–405.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Gareth. “Review of The Word Made Strange.” Reviews in Religion and Theology, 2 (2007), 6.Google Scholar

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. London and Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Kiblinger, Kristin Beise. “Relating Theology of Religions and Comparative Theology”. In The New Comparative Theology: Interreligious Insights from the Next Generation, edited by Francis X. Clooney, 21-42. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Kirkland, Russell. Taoism: The Enduring Tradition. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Knitter, Paul F. “The Pluralist Path: Where We’ve Been, and Where We’re Going”. In Twenty-First Century Theologies of Religions: Retrospection and New Frontiers, edited by Elizabeth Harris, Paul Hedges, and Shanthi Hettiarachchi. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Knitter, Paul F. Without the Buddha I could not be a Christian. Oxford: Oneworld, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Knitter, Paul F. Introducing Theologies of Religions. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Krogt, Christopher van der. “The Rise of Fundamentalisms.” In Controversies in Contemporary Religion, edited by Paul Hedges, 1-38. Volume 3. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2014.Google Scholar

  • McMahon, Christopher. “Theology and the Redemptive Mission of the Church: A Catholic Response to Milbank’s Challenge.” The Heythrop Journal, 51:5 (2010), 781-794.Google Scholar

  • Markham, Ian. A Theology of Engagement. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “The Legitimacy and Genealogy of Secularization in Question.” In Radical Secularization?, edited by Stijn Latré, Walter Van Herck, and Guido Vanheeswijck, 83-127. London and New York: Bloomsbury, forthcoming 2015 (I have used a pre-publication draft of this chapter whose page numbers may not match the final version).Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “Paul against Biopolitics.” In Paul’s New Moment: Continental Philosophy and the Future of Christian Theology, John Milbank, Slavoj Žižek, and Creston Davis, 21-70. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. The Future of Love: Essays in Political Theology. London: SCM, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “The Gift of Ruling.” New Blackfriars, 85: 996 (2004), 212-38.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “Christ the Exception.” New Blackfriars, 82: 969 (2001), 541-56.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “Knowledge: The theological critique of philosophy in Hamann and Jacobi.” In Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, edited by John Milbank, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock, 21-37. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “History of the One God.” The Heythrop Journal, 38 (1997), 371-400.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. The Word Made Strange. Oxford: Blackwells, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. “The End of Dialogue”. In Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered: The Myth of a Pluralistic Theology of Religions, edited by Gavin D’Costa, 174-90.Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John. Theology and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Milbank, John, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock. “Introduction: Suspending the material: the turn of radical orthodoxy.” In Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, edited by John Milbank, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock, 1-20. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Miller, Ron. “Judaism: Siblings in Strife.” In Christian Approaches to Other Faiths: An Introduction, edited by Paul Hedges and Alan Race, 176-90. London: SCM Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Niles, T. D. “Karl Barth, a Personal Memory.” The South East Asian Journal of Theology, Fall (1969), 10-13.Google Scholar

  • Oliver, Simon. “Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: from participation to late modernity.” In The Radical Orthodoxy Reader, edited by John Milbank and Simon Oliver, 3-27. London: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar

  • O’Neill, Maura. Women Speaking, Women Listening: Women in Interreligious Dialogue. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Pieris, Aloysius. Fire and Water: Basic Issues in Asian Buddhism and Christianity. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Phan, Peter C. Being Religious Interreligiously: Asian Perspectives on Interfaith Dialogue. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Pratt, Douglas. The Church and Other Faiths: The World council of Churches, the Vatican, and Interreligious Dialogue. Bern and Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Pratt, Douglas. “Religion and Terrorism: Christian Fundamentalism and Extremism.” Terrorism and Political Violence, 22:3 (2010), 438-56.Google Scholar

  • Pratt, Douglas. “Religious Fundamentalism: A Paradigm for Terrorism?.” Australian Religion Studies Review, 20:2 (2007), 195–215.Google Scholar

  • Pratt, Douglas. “Exclusivism and Exclusivity: A Contemporary Theological Challenge.” Pacifica, 20 (2007), 291-306.Google Scholar

  • Pratt, Douglas. ‘‘Terrorism and Religious Fundamentalism: Prospects for a Predictive Paradigm.’’ Marburg Journal of Religion, 11, no. 1 (June 2006). http://web.uni-marburg.de/religionswissenschaft/journal/mjr/.Google Scholar

  • Race, Alan. Christians and Religious Pluralism: Patterns in the Christian theology of religions. London: SCM, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Randall, Katherine Yafiah. “Loving the Enemy: An Alternative Narrative on Jewish-Muslim Relations.” In Controversies in Contemporary Religion, edited by Paul Hedges, 39-60. Volume 3. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Ramsbotham, Oliver, Tom Woodhouse, and Hugh Miall. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Ruether, Rosemary Radford, and Grau Marion, eds. Interpreting the Postmodern: Responses to ‘Radical Orthodoxy. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. Transformation by Integration: How Inter-faith Encounter Changes Christianity. London: SCM, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. “Pluralisms: How to Approach Religious Diversity Theologically.” In Christian Approaches to Other Faiths: An Introduction, edited by Paul Hedges and Alan Race, 85-110. London: SCM Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. “Exclusivism, Inclusivism, Pluralism: The Tripolar Typology: Clarified and Reaffirmed.” In The Myth of Religious Superiority: A Multifaith Exploration, edited by Paul F. Knitter, 13-27. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Schreiter, Robert. The New Catholicity: Theology between the Global and Local. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Graeme. “Mission and Radical Orthodoxy.” Modern Believing, 44:1 (2003), 47-57.Google Scholar

  • Strange, Daniel. “Exclusivisms: ‘Indeed their Rock is Not Like Our Rock’”. In Christian Approaches to Other Faiths: An Introduction, edited by Paul Hedges and Alan Race, 36-62. London: SCM Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Swidler, Leonard. “The History of Inter-Religious Dialogue.” In The Wiley-Blackwell companion to Inter-Religious Dialogue, edited by Catherine Cornille, 3-19. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Ustorf, Werner. “The Cultural Origins of ‘Intercultural’ Theology.” In Intercultural Theology, edited by David Cheetham and Mark Cartledge, 11-28. London: SCM, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Valkenberg, Pim. “Learned Ignorance and Faithful Interpretation of the Qur’an in Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464).” In Learned Ignorance: Intellectual Humility among Jews, Christians, and Muslims, edited by James Heft, Reuven Firestone and Omid Safi, 34-52. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Ward, Graham. “Intercultural Theology and Political Discipleship.” In Intercultural Theology, edited by David Cheetham and Mark Cartledge, 29-42. London: SCM, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Ward, Graham. Cultural Transformation and Religious Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Wisse, Maarten. “Book Review: Deconstructing Radical Orthodoxy.” Ars Disputandi, 8 (2008), 10-17.Google Scholar

  • Zapf, Dieter and Einsaren, Ståle. “Bullying in the workplace: Recent trends in research and practice – an introduction.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10:4 (2001), 369-373. Google Scholar

About the article


Received: 2014-04-29

Accepted: 2014-07-28

Published Online: 2014-09-19


Citation Information: Open Theology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/opth-2014-0004.

Export Citation

©2014 Paul Hedges. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in