Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Revising Whitehead’s Notion of Society in the Light of Contemporary Physics

Marc A. Pugliese
Published Online: 2015-09-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2015-0015

Abstract

This article argues that Joseph A. Bracken’s revisions of Alfred North Whitehead’s derivative notion of “society” are plausible in view of developments in physics since Whitehead. In particular, Bracken argues that Whitehead’s derivative notion of “society” should rather be a category of existence equiprimordial with “actual entity,” and that contemporary actual entities in concrescence do influence each other as they directly prehend the society as a nexus. The article begins with Whitehead’s view of the metaphysical project as empirical, tentative, and subject to ongoing revision. Next, the essay explains Whitehead’s view of societies and contemporary actual entities. Following this is a survey of developments in physics since Whitehead that are relevant to his understanding of “society” and contemporary actual entities. The article then explains how Bracken differs from Whitehead on these points and argues that the physics developments corroborate Bracken’s proposed revisions to Whitehead. The essay ends with a restatement of Whitehead’s view of metaphysics as provisional and in need of ongoing revision.

Keywords: Alfred North Whitehead; Joseph A. Bracken; Process Philosophy; Process Theology; Process Thought; Metaphysics; Ontology; Philosophical Theology; Fundamental Theology; Thomism; Substance; Science and Religion; Physics

References

  • Aristotle. Categories. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 Volumes, edited by Jonathan Barnes and translated by W. D. Ross, 1:3–24. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 Volumes, edited by Jonathan Barnes and translated by W. D. Ross, 2:1552–1728. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. Google Scholar

  • Aspect, Alain, Jean Dalibard, and Gérard Roger. “Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalites Using Time-varying Analyzers.” Physical Review Letters 49 (1982): 1039–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Auyang, Sunny Y. Foundations of Complex Systems Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Google Scholar

  • Bell, John S. “La nouvelle cuisine.” In Between Science and Technology, edited by A. Sarlemijn and P. Kroes, 97–118. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, 1990. Google Scholar

  • Bell, John S. “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox.” Physics 1 (1964): 195–200. Google Scholar

  • Birkhoff, Garrett, and John Von Neumann. “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics.” Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 37:4 (1936): 823–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Born, Max. Atomic Physics. New York: Hafner, 1957. Google Scholar

  • Born, Max. The Restless Universe. New York: Dover, 1951. Google Scholar

  • Bohm, David. Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1957. Google Scholar

  • Bohm, David. Quantum Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951. Google Scholar

  • Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge, 1980. Google Scholar

  • Bohm, D. J., and B. J. Hiley. “On the Intuitive Understanding of Nonlocality as Implied by Quantum Theory.” Foundations of Physics 5:1 (1975): 95–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bohr, Niels. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Authentic Subjectivity and Genuine Objectivity.” Horizons 11 (Fall 1984): 290–303. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. Christianity and Process Thought: Spirituality for a Changing World. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2006. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. The Divine Matrix: Creativity as Link Between East and West. In the Faith Meets Faith: An Orbis Series in Interreligious Dialogue series. Maryknoll: Orbis, 1995. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Energy Events and Fields.” Process Studies 18 (Fall 1989): 153–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. God: Three Who Are One. In the Engaging Theology: Catholic Perspectives series, edited by Tetha Wiley. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2008. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Images of God within Systematic Theology.” Theological Studies 63:2 (June 2002): 362–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Intersubjectivity and the Coming of God.” Journal of Religion 83:3 (July 2003): 381–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “The Issue of Panentheism in the Dialogue with the Non-believer.” Studies in Religion/Sciences-religieuses 21:2 (1992): 207–18. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. The One in the Many: A Contemporary Reconstruction of the God–World Relationship. Grand Rapids,: Eerdmans, 2001. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights: A Process Approach.” Cogito 1:1 (March 1983): 51–73. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Proposals for Overcoming the Atomism Within Process-Relational Metaphysics.” Process Studies 23 (Spring 1994): 10–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. Society and Spirit: A Trinitarian Cosmology. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press, 1991. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Spirit and Society: A Study of Two Concepts.” Process Studies 15 (Winter 1986): 244–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Substance—Society—Natural System: A Creative Rethinking of Whitehead’s Cosmology.” International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (1985): 3–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Supervenience: Two Proposals/Supervenience and Basic Christian Beliefs.” Zygon 36 (2001): 137–52. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “The Theology of God of Elizabeth A. Johnson.” In Things New and Old: Essays on the Theology of Elizabeth A. Johnson, edited by Phyllis Zagano and Terrence W. Tilley, 21–38. New York, NY: Crossroad, 1999. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. The Triune Symbol. Persons, Process and Community. In the College Theology Society Studies in Religion series. Lanham: University Press of America, 1985. Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. What Are They Saying About the Trinity? New York: Paulist Press, 1979. Google Scholar

  • Brillouin, Léon. Wave Propagation and Group Velocity. New York: Academic Press 1960. Google Scholar

  • Burgers, J. M. “The Measuring Process in Quantum Theory.” Reviews of Modern Physics 35 (January 1963): 145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clauser, J. F., and A. Shimony. “Bell’s Theorem. Experimental Tests and Implications.” Reports on Progress in Physics 41 (1978): 1881–1927. Google Scholar

  • Cushing, James T. and Ernan McMullin, editors. Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s Theorem. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989. Google Scholar

  • Diener, G. “Superluminal group velocities and information transfer.” Physics Letters A 223:S (1996): 327–31. Google Scholar

  • Eckle, P., A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. Dörner, H. G. Muller, M. Büttiker, and U. Keller. “Attosecond Ionization and Tunneling Delay Time Measurements in Helium.” Science 322:5907 (2008): 1525–29. Google Scholar

  • Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 47 (1935): 777–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finkelstein, David. Quantum Relativity: A Synthesis of the Ideas of Einstein and Heisenberg. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996. Google Scholar

  • Freedman, Stuart J., and John F. Clauser. “Experimental Test of Local Hidden Variable Theories.” Physical Review Letters 28 (1972): 938–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gröblacher, Simon, Tomasz Paterek, Rainer Kaltenbaek, Časlav Brukner, Marek Żukowski, Markus Aspelmeyer and Anton Zeilinger. “An Experimental Test of Non-local Realism.” Nature 446 (2007): 871–75. Google Scholar

  • Heisenberg, Werner. Across the Frontiers. New York: Harper and Row, 1974. Google Scholar

  • Heisenberg, Werner. “The Development of the Interpretation of Quantum Theory.” In Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, edited by Wolfgang Pauli, 12–29. New York: McGraw-Hill 1955. Google Scholar

  • Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper Perennial, 2007. Google Scholar

  • Heisenberg, Werner, Max Born, Erwin Schrödinger and Pierre Auger. On Modern Physics. New York: Clarkson Potter, 1961. Google Scholar

  • Jungerman, John A. “Evidence for Process in the Physical World.” In Physics and Whitehead, edited by Timothy E. Eastman and Hank Keeton, 47–55. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003. Google Scholar

  • Kim, Yoon-Ho, Rong Yu, Sergei P. Kulik, Yanhua Shih, and Marlan O. Scully. “A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser.” Physical Review Letters 84:1 (2000): 1–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Low, Francis E. “Comments on apparent superluminal propagation.” Annals of Physics 7:7–8 (1998): 660–61. Google Scholar

  • Maa, Xiao-Song, Johannes Koflera, Angie Qarrya, Nuray Tetika, Thomas Scheidla, Rupert Ursina, Sven Ramelowa, Thomas Herbsta, Lothar Ratschbachera, Alessandro Fedrizzia, Thomas Jenneweina, and Anton Zeilingera. “Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA of the United Sciences of the United States of America 10:4 (January 2013): 1221–26. Google Scholar

  • Nimtz, Günter. “Tunneling Confronts Special Relativity.” Foundations of Physics 41:7 (2011): 1193–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pugliese, Marc A. “Orthodoxy or Orthopraxy? Recent Developments in Physics and Joseph A. Bracken as Revisionist Whiteheadian.” In Seeking Common Ground: Evaluation and Critique of Joseph Bracken’s Comprehensive Worldview, Festschrift in Honor of Joseph A. Bracken, S. J., edited by Marc A. Pugliese and Gloria L. Schaab, 97–116. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2012. Google Scholar

  • Razavy, Moshen. Quantum Theory of Tunneling. River Edge: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2003. Google Scholar

  • Rowe, M. A., D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C. A. Sackett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland. “Experimental Violation of a Bell’s Inequality with Efficient Detection.” Nature 409 (2001): 791–94. Google Scholar

  • Shimony, Abner. “Bell’s Theorem.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Google Scholar

  • Shimony, Abner. “The Methodology of Synthesis: Parts and Wholes in Low-energy Physics.” In Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, edited by R. Kargon and P. Achinstein, 399–424. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987. Google Scholar

  • Shimony, Abner. “Quantum Physics and the Philosophy of Whitehead.” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 2, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, 307–30. New York: Humanities Press, 1965. Google Scholar

  • Sokolovski, D. “Why does relativity allow quantum tunneling to ‘take no time’?” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 460:2042 (2004) 499–506. Google Scholar

  • Stapp, Henry P. “Are Superluminal Connections Necessary?” Il Nuovo Cimento 40B (1977): 190–204. Google Scholar

  • Stapp, Henry P. “Dialogue for Part III.” In Physics and Whitehead, edited by Timothy E. Eastman and Hank Keeton, 187–95. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003. Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, A. M., A.M., Kwiat, P.G. Chiao and R.Y. Chiao. “Measurement of the Single-Photon Tunneling Time.” Physical Review Letters 71:708 (1993): 708–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teller, Paul. “Relativity, Relational Holism, and the Bell Inequalities.” In Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, edited by J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin, 208–23. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989. Google Scholar

  • Tugendhat, Ernst TI KATA TINOS. Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber Verlag, 1958. Google Scholar

  • Von Neumann, John. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, translated by Robert T. Beyer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. Google Scholar

  • Watson, Andrew. “Quantum Spookiness Wins, Einstein Loses in Photon Test.” Science 277 (1997): 481. Google Scholar

  • Weihs, Gregor, Thomas Jennewein, Christoph Simon, Harald Weinfurter and Anton Zeilinger. “Violation of Bell’s Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions.” Physical Review Letters 81 (1998): 5039–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wheeler, John Archibald. “Information, physics, quantum: The search for links.” In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, edited by Wojciech H. Zurek. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley, 1990. Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, John Archibald. “The ‘Past’ and the ‘Delayed-Choice’ Double-Slit Experiment.” In Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, edited by A. R. Marlow. 9–48. New York: Academic Press, 1978. Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Macmillan, 1933; reprint, Free Press, 1967. Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Macmillan, 1929; corrected edition, New York: Free Press, 1978. Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan, 1925; reprint, Free Press, 1967. Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Symbolism, Its Meaning and Effect. New York: Macmillan, 1927; reprint, Bronx: Fordham University Press, 1985. Google Scholar

  • Winful, Herbert G. “Tunneling time, the Hartman effect, and superluminality: A proposed resolution of an old paradox.” Physics Reports 436 (1–2) (2006): 1–69. Google Scholar

  • Witten, Edward. “Duality, Spacetime and Quantum Mechanics.” Physics Today (May 1997): 28–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article


Received: 2015-08-03

Accepted: 2015-08-31

Published Online: 2015-09-21


Citation Information: Open Theology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2015-0015.

Export Citation

©2015 Marc A. Pugliese. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in