Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

CiteScore 2018: 0.37

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.975

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Language about God in Whitehead’s Philosophy

Dissimilarities and Similarities between Aquinas and Whitehead

Palmyre M.F. Oomen
Published Online: 2015-10-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2015-0018

Abstract

The way Whitehead speaks of God in his ‘philosophy of organism,’ and the evaluation thereof, is the subject of this article. The background of this issue is the position - broadly shared in theology, and here represented by Aquinas - that one should not speak ‘carelessly’ about God. Does Whitehead violate this rule, or does his language for God express God’s otherness and relatedness to the world in a new intriguing way? In order to answer this question an introduction into Whitehead’s philosophy is given, and especially into his category of existence, the ‘actual entity.’ For Whitehead God is an actual entity, and so is the most trivial puff of existence. His perception of the similarity and greater dissimilarity between God and the worldly actual entities (and clusters thereof) is analyzed. In the main and final section of this article these insights are used as a tool to decrypt Whitehead’s God-language. Here the status of Whitehead’s and Aquinas’ statements about God are compared, Whitehead’s ideas concerning the analogical character of concrete language are discussed, and it is argued that in Whitehead’s philosophy too there is no discourse about God without a shift or breakdown of the ‘ordinary’ meaning of language.

Keywords: Alfred North Whitehead; Thomas Aquinas; language about God; analogy; God as one actual entity; reversal of God’s poles

References

  • Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae (1267-1273). Translations I have used: New English Translation of St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae (Summa Theologica), by Alfred J. Freddoso (http://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/summa-translation/TOC-part1.htm), and The Summa Theologica, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Benziger Bross, edition 1947). Google Scholar

  • Burrell, David. Analogy and Philosophical Language. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1973. Google Scholar

  • Christian, William A. An Interpretation of Whitehead’s Metaphysics. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1967 (1st ed. 1959). Google Scholar

  • De Pater, Wim A. Analogy, Disclosures, and Narrative Theology (translated by D.K. Wilken). Leuven: Acco, 1988. Google Scholar

  • Ferré, Frederick. Language, Logic, and God. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1961. Google Scholar

  • Ferré, Frederick. “Analogy in Theology.” Lemma in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol I, edited by P. Edwards. Macmillan & Free Press: New York, 1967, 94-97. Google Scholar

  • Franklin, Stephen T. Speaking from the Depths: Alfred North Witehead’s Hermeneutical Metaphysics of Propositions, Experience, Symbolism, Language and Religion. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1990. Google Scholar

  • Hartshorne, Charles. “The Idea of God - Literal or Analogical?” Christian Scholar 29/2 (1956): 131-136. Google Scholar

  • Hartshorne, Charles. “Three Strata of Meaning in Religious Discourse.” In Charles Hartshorne. The Logic of Perfection and Other Essays in Neoclassical Metaphysics. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1962, 133-147. Google Scholar

  • Johnson, A.H. “Some Conversations with Whitehead Concerning God and Creativity.” In Explorations in Whitehead’s Philosophy, edited by L.S. Ford & G.L. Kline. New York: Fordham University Press, 1983, 3-13. Google Scholar

  • Ogden, Schubert M. “What Sense Does It Make to Say «God Acts in History?».” Journal of Religion 43 (1963): 1-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ogden, Schubert M. “The Experience of God: Critical Reflections on Hartshorne’s Theory of Analogy.” In Existence and Actuality: Conversations with Ch. Hartshorne, edited by J.B. Cobb, Jr. & F.I. Gamwell. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984, 16-37. (=Ch. II). Google Scholar

  • Oomen, Palmyre M.F. “The Prehensibility of God’s Consequent Nature.” Process Studies 27/1-2 (1998): 108-133. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/13029686/The_Prehensibility_of_God_s_Consequent_Nature. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oomen, Palmyre. “God’s Power and Almightiness in Whitehead’s Thought.” Open Theology 1 (2015): 277-292. Google Scholar

  • Palmer, Humphrey. Analogy. London: Macmillan, 1973. Google Scholar

  • Ramsey, Ian T. Religious Language: An Empirical Placing of Theological Phrases. London: SCM Press, 1957. Google Scholar

  • Reinelt, Herbert R. “Whitehead and Theistic Language.” Christian Scholar 50 (1967): 222-234. Google Scholar

  • Reinelt, Herbert R. “A Whiteheadian Doctrine of Analogy.” Modern Schoolman 48 (1970-1971): 327-342. Google Scholar

  • Rikhof, Herwi. “Over God praat je niet zomaar.” [“About God you should not speak carelessly”] Tijdschrift voor Geestelijk Leven 43/2 (1987): 190-203. Google Scholar

  • Rikhof, H.W.M. Over God spreken: Een tekst van Thomas van Aquino uit de Summa Theologiae (I, Q.13) [Speaking about God: A Text of Thomas Aquinas from the Summa Theologiae (I, Q.13)]. Delft: Meinema, 1988. Google Scholar

  • Ross, J.F. Portraying Analogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. Google Scholar

  • Suchocki, Marjorie. “The Metaphysical Ground of the Whiteheadian God.” Process Studies 5/4 (1975): 237-246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, Owen C. “Analogy at Impasse.” Encounter 45/2 (1984): 95-109. Google Scholar

  • Tracy, David. “The Analogical Imagination in Catholic Theology.” In D. Tracy & J.B. Cobb, Jr. Talking About God: Doing Theology in the Context of Modern Pluralism. New York: Seabury Press, 1983, 17-28. (=Ch. II). Google Scholar

  • Tracy, David. “Analogy and Dialectic: God‑Language.” In D. Tracy & J.B. Cobb, Jr. Talking About God: Doing Theology in the Context of Modern Pluralism. New York: Seabury Press, 1983, 29-38. (=Ch. III). Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press, 1967 (1st ed. 1925). (=SMW). Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion in the Making. New York: Meridian, 1960 (1st ed. 1926). (=RM). Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. (Corrected edition, edited by D.R. Griffin & D.W. Sherburne). New York: Free Press, 1978 (1st ed. 1929). (=PR). Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1967 (1st ed. 1933). (=AI). Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press, 1968 (1st ed. 1938). (=MT). Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. “Immortality.” In The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, edited by P.A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor, 1951, 682-700 (1e ed. 1941). (=Imm). Google Scholar

About the article


Received: 2015-09-01

Accepted: 2015-09-21

Published Online: 2015-10-14


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2015-0018.

Export Citation

©2015 Palmyre M.F. Oomen. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in