Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Myself, Only Moreso

Conditions for the Possibility of Transreligious Theology

J. R. Hustwit
Published Online: 2016-04-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0018

Abstract

Transreligious theologians are posed with a number of difficult questions. First, how can I understand the beliefs and practices of a worldview I do not share? Then, once I begin to construct and synthesize truth claims, how normative are the source traditions? Finally, how do we transreligious theologians judge truth claims as better and worse? By offering answers to these questions using a model of critical interreligious appropriation, we may find a basis for a critical transreligious theology that avoids naïve syncretisms and pernicious incommensurability.

Keywords: comparative theology; interreligious dialogue; interfaith dialogue; hermeneutics; Gadamer; Ricoeur; transreligious theology

References

  • Funtowicz, Silvio and Jerome R. Ravetz. “Emergent Complex Systems.” Futures (1994) 26:6. 568-582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Myth in the Age of Science.” In Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics, 91-102. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. Yale Studies in Hermeneutics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999. Google Scholar

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd revised edition. Edited by Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum Books, 2000. Google Scholar

  • Hustwit, J. R. Interreligious Hermeneutics and the Pursuit of Truth. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014. Google Scholar

  • Jovian Archive Media. “About Ra Uru Hu.” http://www.jovianarchive.com/Newcomers#ra. Accessed January 10, 2016. Google Scholar

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Google Scholar

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Translated by Georges Van Den Abbeele. Theory and History of Literature. Volume 46, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1988. Google Scholar

  • Ramanuja. Sribhasya. In Scriptures of the East. 2nd edition. Edited by James Fieser and John Powers. New York: McGraw Hill, 2004. Google Scholar

  • Ricoeur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1975. Google Scholar

  • Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Ft. Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976. Google Scholar

  • Tracy, David. The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism. New York: Crossroad Books, 1981. Google Scholar

About the article


Received: 2016-01-26

Accepted: 2016-03-21

Published Online: 2016-04-26


Citation Information: Open Theology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0018.

Export Citation

©2016 J. R. Hustwit. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in