Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Trinitarian Theology between Religious Walls in the Writings of Raimon Panikkar

Christopher Denny
Published Online: 2016-05-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0030

Abstract

The Theology Without Walls (TWW) project attempts to interpret spiritual experiences without subjecting them to a priori criteria from religious traditions, but TWW does not substitute universalized secular criteria for religious criteria. Some have promoted “multiple religious belonging” as a prism through which to interpret the experiences of people participating in more than one spiritual path. Yet the concept of multiple religious belonging still presumes a framework in which communal traditions coordinate one’s spiritual experiences. For TWW, however, belonging does not have to be religious or interreligious or multireligious. The manner in which practitioners thematize, or refuse to thematize, their journeys is not a prerequisite for participation in TWW. Is TWW then a sect of the disaffiliated that rejects communal encounters and traditions? How does TWW operate in practice? Raimon Panikkar’s writings on the Trinity demonstrate how a theologian/practitioner well versed in two traditions responds to what he calls “the cosmotheandric experience” by articulating how trinitarian presence is not primarily a doctrine but contrasting facets of reality to which Christianity and Hinduism bear witness. Panikkar’s work is a model of how scholars working with TWW can engage with traditions and simultaneously remain attentive to the particularities of everyday reality.

Keywords: Trinity; comparative theology; theology of religions; interreligious dialogue; Theology Without Walls

References

  • Bhagavad Gita. Translated by Barbara Stoler Miller. New York: Bantam, 1986. Google Scholar

  • Cornille, Catherine, ed. Many Mansions? Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2002. Google Scholar

  • Cousins, Ewert H. “Panikkar’s Advaitic Trinitarianism.” In The Intercultural Challenge of Raimon Panikkar, edited by Joseph Prabhu, 119—30. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1996. Google Scholar

  • Dupuis, Jacques. Toward a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1997. Google Scholar

  • Finke, Roger and Rodney Stark. The Churching of America: Winners and Losers in Our Church Economy, 1776—2005. Rev. ed. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005. Google Scholar

  • Grimes, William. “Raimon Panikkar, Catholic Theologian, Is Dead at 91.” New York Times, September 4, 2010. Google Scholar

  • Heim, S. Mark. Salvations: Truth and Difference in Religion. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1995. Google Scholar

  • Hick, John. God Has Many Names. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1982. Google Scholar

  • Hick, John. An Interpretation of Religion, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004. Google Scholar

  • Hick, John, ed. The Myth of God Incarnate. London: SCM, 1977. Google Scholar

  • Jerolmack, Colin and Douglas Porpora. “Religion, Rationality, and Experience: A Response to the New Rational Choice Theory of Religion.” Sociological Theory 22:1 (2004), 140—60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D. Paul. “From Religious Markets to Religious Communities: Contrasting Implications for Applied Research.” Review of Religious Research 44:4 (2003), 325—40. Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Keith E. Rethinking the Trinity and Religious Pluralism: An Augustinian Assessment. Strategic Initiatives in Evangelical Theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2011. Google Scholar

  • Katz, Nathan. “The State of the Art of Hindu-Jewish Dialogue.” In Indo-Judaic Studies in the Twenty-First Century: A View from the Margin, edited by Nathan Katz, Ranabir Chakravarti, Braj M. Sinha, and Shalva Weil, 113—26. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Google Scholar

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. Philosophical Fragments. In Philosophical Fragments, Johannes Climacus. Edited and translated by Howard Hong and Edna Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985. Google Scholar

  • Knitter, Paul. No Other Name? A Critical Survey of Christian Attitudes to World Religions. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1985. Google Scholar

  • Lindbeck, George. The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984. Google Scholar

  • MacPherson, Camilia Gangasingh. A Critical Reading of the Development of Raimon Panikkar’s Thought on the Trinity. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1996. Google Scholar

  • McCutcheon, Russell T. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. The Cosmotheandric Experience: Emerging Religious Consciousness. Edited by Scott Eastham. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1993. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. The Intrareligious Dialogue. Rev. ed. New York: Paulist, 1999. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. Myth, Faith, and Hermeneutics: Cross-Cultural Studies. New York: Paulist, 1979. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. “On Christian Identity: Who Is a Christian?” In Many Mansions? Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity, edited by Catherine Cornille, 121—44. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2002. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. The Rhythm of Being. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2010. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. The Trinity and the Religious Experience of Man: Icon—Person—Mystery. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1973. Google Scholar

  • Panikkar, Raimon. Worship and Secular Man. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1973. Google Scholar

  • Phan, Peter. Being Religious Interreligiously: Asian Perspectives on Interfaith Dialogue. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2004. Google Scholar

  • Phan, Peter. “Multiple Religious Belonging: Opportunities and Challenges for Theology and Church.” Theological Studies 64:3 (2003), 495—519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prabhu, Joseph, ed. The Intercultural Challenge of Raimon Panikkar. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1996. Google Scholar

  • Race, Alan. Thinking about Religious Pluralism: Shaping Theology of Religions for Our Times. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015. Google Scholar

  • Rahner, Karl. “Anonymous Christians.” In Concerning Vatican Council II, trans. Karl H. Kruger and Boniface Kruger, 390—98. Vol. 6, Theological Investigations. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1966. Google Scholar

  • Rahner, Karl. “Observations on the Problem of the ‘Anonymous Christian’.” In Ecclesiology, Questions in the Church, the Church in the World, trans. David Bourke. Vol. 14, Theological Investigations. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1976. Google Scholar

  • Rahner, Karl. The Trinity. Translated by Joseph Donceel. New York: Crossroad, 1997. Google Scholar

  • Sinha, Braj M. “Divine Anthropos and Cosmic Tree: Hindu and Jewish Mysticism in Comparative Perspective.” In Indo-Judaic Studies in the Twenty-First Century: A View from the Margin, edited by Nathan Katz, Ranabir Chakravarti, Braj M. Sinha, and Shalva Weil, 93—112. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Google Scholar

  • Smith, Wilfrid Cantwell. The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991. Google Scholar

  • Stark, Rodney and William Sims Bainbridge. A Theory of Religion. Vol. 2, Toronto Studies in Religion. New York: Peter Lang, 1987. Google Scholar

  • Williams, Rowan. “Trinity and Pluralism.” In Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered, edited by Gavin D’Costa, 3—15. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1990. Google Scholar

About the article


Received: 2016-01-20

Accepted: 2016-03-31

Published Online: 2016-05-24


Citation Information: Open Theology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0030.

Export Citation

©2016 Christopher Denny. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in