Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Flexible Believers in the Netherlands: A Paradigm Shift toward Transreligious Multiplicity

Manuela Kalsky
Published Online: 2017-07-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0027

Abstract

The Netherlands has undergone a radical religious transformation through secularization, individualization and migration. Expressions of Christian belief are no longer strictly defined by the Church and hybrid forms of religiosity incorporating other religions have emerged. After a brief sketch of Dutch religious plurality, the author focuses on interviews with ‘flexible believers’, people who combine elements from different religious traditions and worldviews. Through interviews, she discovers a number of characteristics of these multiple religious believers (MRB) - interviewees - such as ritual praxis, identity-making processes and belonging - and reflects on their impact for the wider picture of religiosity in today‘s post-Christian Dutch network society. She concludes that hybrid forms of lived religion like mrb, present a challenge to traditional concepts of religious identity and belonging. They require a paradigm shift from an ‘either/or’ to a relational ‘as well as’ approach within a rhizomatic network of meaning.

Keywords : multiple religious belonging; hybrid religiosity; religious transformation; transreligious diversity; lived religion; rhizomatic thinking

References

  • Benima, Tamarah. “Twee handen op Gods buik”. In: Kalsky, Manuela, Overdijk, Ida, Van der Spek, Inez. Moderne devoties: Vrouwen over geloven. Amsterdam: De Prom, 2005, 28-38.Google Scholar

  • Bernhardt, Reinhold. “Synkretismus’ als Deutekategorie multireligiöser Identitätsbildungen”. In: Bernhard, Reinhold, Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (eds.). Multiple religiöse Identität: Aus verschiedenen religiösen Traditionen schöpfen. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2008, 267-290.Google Scholar

  • Berghuijs, Joantine. “Multiple religious belonging in the Netherlands: an empirical approach to hybrid religiosity”. Open Theology, 3, 2017, 19-37.Google Scholar

  • Bernts, Ton, Dekker, Gerard, De Hart, Joep. God in Nederland 1996 -2006. Kampen: Ten Have, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Bernts, Ton, Berghuijs, Joantine. God in Nederland 1966-2015. Utrecht: Ten Have, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Cornille, Catherine. Many Mansions? Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. New York: Orbis Books, Maryknoll, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Crul, Maurice, Schneider, Jens, Lelie, Frans. Superdiversiteit: Een nieuwe visie op integratie. Amsterdam: CASA/VU University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • D’Costa, Gavin, Thompson, Ross (eds.). Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmation, Objections, Explorations. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Davie, Grace. “Believing without Belonging: Is This the Future of Religion in Britain?” Social Compass, Vol. 37:4 (1990), 455-469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles, Guattari, Félix. Rhizom. Berlin: Merve Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, Gilles, Guattari, Félix. Tausend Plateaus. Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie. Berlin:Merve Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Drew, Rose. Buddhist and Christian?: An Exploration of dual belonging. London/New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Drew, Rose. “Chasing two Rabids: Dual Belonging and the Question of Salvation/Liberation”. In: D’Costa, Gavin, Thompson, Ross (eds.). Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmation, Objections, Explorations. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing, 2016, 13-30.Google Scholar

  • Droogers, André. Religion at Play: A Manifesto. Eugene (OR): Cascade Books, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Feldmeier, Peter. “Theology Without Walls: Sic et Non”. Open Theology 2, 2016, 223-228.Google Scholar

  • Geldof, Dirk. Superdiversity in the heart of Europe: How migration changes our society. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Grung, Anne Hege. Gender justice in Muslim-Christian readings: Christian and Muslim women in Norway making meaning of texts from the Bible, the Koran, and the Hadith. Leiden, Boston: Brill, Rodopi, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela. Christaphanien: Die Re-Vision der Christologie aus der Sicht von Frauen in unterschiedlichen Kulturen. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela. “Embracing Diversity. Reflections on the Transformation of Christian Identity”. Studies in Interreligious Dialogue 17 (2007) 2, 221-231.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela. “Religiöse Flexibilität: Eine Antwort auf kulturelle und religiöse Vielfalt”. In: Bernhardt, Reinhold, Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (eds.). Multiple religiöse Identität: Aus verschiedenen religiösen Traditionen schöpfen. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2008, 219-242.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela, Von Kellenbach, Katharina. “Interreligious Dialogue and the Development of a Transreligious Identity”. In: Esser, Annette, Von Kellenbach, Katharina, Mehlhorn, Annette, Biberstein, Sabine, Gasser, Christine, Rapp, Ursula (eds.). Feminist Approaches to Interreligious Dialogue. Journal of the European Society of Women in Theological Research. Vol. 17, 2009, 41-58.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela. “In Search of a ‘New We’ in the Netherlands: Interreligious Multimedia Projects and their Contribution to Social Coherence”. In: Van der Braak, André, Wei, Dedong, Zhu, Caifan (eds.). Religion and Social Cohesion. Western, Chinese and Intercultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2015, 169-179.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela, Pruim, Frieda. “Flexibel geloven: Zingeving voorbij de grenzen van religies”. Vught: Skandalon 2014.Google Scholar

  • Kalsky, Manuela. “Bausteine für eine dialogische Theologie.” In: Amipur, Katajun, Knauth, Th., Roloff, Carola, Weisse, Wolfram (Hrsg.). Perspektiven dialogischer Theologie. Offenheit in den Religionen und eine Hermeneutik des interreligiösen Dialogs. Münster/New York: Waxmann, 2016, 335-343.Google Scholar

  • Katz Miller, Susan. Being Both: Embracing Two Religons in One Interfaith Family. Boston/Beacon Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Keller, Catherine. On the Mystery: Discerning Divinity in Process. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Keller, Catherine, Schneider, Laurel (eds.). Polydoxy: Theology of Multiplicity and Relation. London, New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

  • McGuire, Meredith B. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Meir, Ephraim. Differenz und Dialog. Münster: Waxmann Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Moyaert, Marianne, Geldhof, Joris (eds.). Ritual Participation and Interreligious Dialogue: Boundaries, Transgressions and Innovations. London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Nissen, Peter. “The Holistic Revolution: Contemporary Transformations of Religiosity in the Netherlands”. In: Kalsky, Manuela, Nissen, Peter (eds.). A Glance in the Mirror: Dutch and Polish religious cultures. Münster: Lit-Verlag, 2012, 23-37.Google Scholar

  • Oostveen, Daan F. “Multiple Religious Belonging: Hermeneutical Challenges for Theology of Religions”. Open Theology, 2017, 3, 38-47.Google Scholar

  • Pieper, Jos, Bisschops, Anke, Putman, Willem, Van IJssel, Suzette (2013) “Bezoekers van christelijke spirituele centra in Nederland”. In: K. de Groot, Kees, Pieper, Jos, Putman, Willem (eds.) Zelf zorgen voor je ziel. De actualiteit van christelijke spirituele centra. Almere: Parthenon, 2013, 71-115.Google Scholar

  • Schneider, Laurel. Beyond Monotheism: A Theology of Multiplicity. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Sointu, Eeva, Woodhead, Linda. “Spirituality, Gender and Expressive Selfhood”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Vol. 47:2, 2008, 259-276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, Charles. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, Charles. The Secular Age. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Thatamanil, John J. “Eucharist Upstairs, Yoga Downstairs: On Multiple Religious Participation”. In: Rajakuma, Peniel Jesudason Rufus, Dayam, Joseph Prabhakar (eds.). Many yet One?: Multiple Religious Belonging. Geneva: World Council of Churches Publications, 2016, 5-26.Google Scholar

  • Thatamanil, John J. “Transreligous Theology as the Quest for Interreligious Wisdom: Defining, Defending, and Teaching Transreligious Theology”. Open Theology 2, 2016, 354-362.Google Scholar

  • Van der Braak, André. “Meervoudige religieuze binding: Van een dualistisch wij-zij-denken naar een inclusief non-dualistisch denken”. In: Kalsky, Manuela (ed.). Alsof ik thuis ben. Samenleven in een land vol verschillen. Almere: Parthenon, 2013, 307-321.Google Scholar

  • Van IJssel, Suzette. “Meer geloven op één kussen? Meervoudige levensbeschouwelijke verbondenheid in Nederland”. In: Kalsky, Manuela (ed.). Alsof ik thuis ben. Samenleven in een land vol verschillen. Almere: Parthenon, 2013, 271-287.Google Scholar

  • Von Brück, Michael, Einheit der Wirklichkeit. Gott, Gotteserfahrung und Meditation im hinduistisch-christlichen Dialog. München: Kaiser, 1986.Google Scholar

  • Von Brück, Michael, “Identität und Widerspruch”. In: Bernhard, Reinhold, Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (eds.). Multiple religiöse Identität: Aus verschiedenen religiösen Traditionen schöpfen. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2008, 291-328.Google Scholar

  • Wildman, Wesley J. “Theology Without Walls: The Future of Transreligious Theology”. Open Theology 2, 2016, 242-247.Google Scholar

  • Zock, Hetty. “Religious Voices in the Dialogical Self: Towards a Conceptual-Analytical Frame on the Basis of Hubert Hermans’s Dialogical Self Theory”. In: Religious Voices in Self-Narratives. Making Sense of Life in Times of Transition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013, 11-35.Google Scholar

  • Zulehner, Paul. “Spirituelle Dynamik in säkularen Kulturen? Deutschland - Österreich - Schweiz”. In: Religionsmonitor 2008. Gütersloh: Gütershoher Verlagshaus, 2008, 152-156.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-05-08

Accepted: 2017-06-07

Published Online: 2017-07-14

Published in Print: 2017-01-26


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 345–359, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0027.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
brimadevi van Niekerk
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 2018, Volume 74, Number 3

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in