Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Modest Reflections on the Term ‘Religious Experience’

Michael Durham Torre
Published Online: 2017-07-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0028

Abstract

The paper urges a reconsideration of the term “religious experience,” as it is presently used in textbooks in the Philosophy of Religion (to which it first refers). The term needs to include not only what might be termed “extraordinary” religious experience (as used in those texts), but the “ordinary” experience of most who practice a religion, and it needs to assess such experience not so much as a “proof” of God (or a “Transcendent Reality”), but rather as a credible witness to what it affirms. The central portion of the paper then investigates how “experience” was used and understood-as a conscious term of analysis-by Plato, Aristotle, and Aquinas. It then argues that this understanding of “experience” can be applied successfully to refer to “religious experience,” whether “ordinary” or “extraordinary”: it argues that such an understanding would fit well any phenomenological description of what most people mean by their “religious experience.” It concludes that there is work to be done both to develop adequate criteria to discern how credible religious experience is, as a witness to its object, and to apply such criteria to major religions.

Keywords : experience; praxis; subjective; immediate; credible

References

  • Alston, William P. “God and Religious Experience.” In Philosophy of Religion: A Guide to the Subject, edited by Brian Davies, 65-69. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas. Aristotle’s De Anima (in the version of William of Moerbeke and the commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas), translated by Kenelm Foster, O.P., and Silvester Humphries, O.P., with an introduction by Ivo Thomas, O.P. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas. Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, translated by C.I. Litzinger, O.P., foreword by Ralph McInerny. Notre Dame, Indiana: Dumb Ox Books, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas. Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, translated by John P. Rowan. Chicago: Regnery, 1961.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas. Commentary on the Posterior Analytics of Aristotle, translated by Fr. Larcher, O.P. Albany, New York: Magi, 1970.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, translated with notes by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume I, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Davies, Brian. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Davies, Brian. Philosophy of Religion: A Guide to the Subject. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Longmans, 1925 [1902].Google Scholar

  • Kessler, Gary E. Studying Religion: An Introduction Through Cases. New York: McGraw Hill, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Petersen, Michael, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger. Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Plato. Laches and Charmides, translated by Rosamund Kent Sprague. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Pojman, Louis P. and Michael Rea. Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, 5th edition. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Pojman, Louis P. Philosophy of Religion. Mountain View, California: Mayfield, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Quinn, Philip L. and Charles Taliaferro. A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, William L. Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Schleiermacher, Friedrich. The Christian Faith. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976 [1830].Google Scholar

  • Smart, Ninian. The Religious Experience of Mankind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969.Google Scholar

  • Stewart, Melville T. Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology of Contemporary Views. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Taliaferro, Charles. Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Westphal, Merold. “A Phenomenological Account of Religious Experience.” In Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings, 5th edition, edited by Michael Petersen, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger, 79-86. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Yandell, Keith E. “Religious Experience.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Philip L. Quinn and Charles Taliaferro, 367-75. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Zagzebski, Linda and Timothy D. Miller. Readings in Philosophy of Religion: Ancient to Contemporary. Chicester, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-05-09

Accepted: 2017-06-19

Published Online: 2017-07-18

Published in Print: 2017-01-26


Citation Information: Open Theology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0028.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in