Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Phenomenology’s Rejects: Religion after Derrida’s Denegations

Jason W. Alvis
Published Online: 2017-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0045

Abstract

Religion, as well as any individuals’ volitionally chosen ‟worldview,” generally get conceived solely in affirmative terms of value. ‟Religion” has been conceptualized almost solely on the terms of axiology: as the experience of ‟the greatest” holiness (Otto), the purely valuable sacred (Eliade); the most ‟ultimate concern” (Tillich); the symbols accepted to order life (Geertz), or the binding of oneself to deep value (Müller). Yet there are limitations of such axiomatic thinking, limitations that can be exemplified through an interpretation of Derrida’s ‟globolatinization,” which he described as a system of thought that promotes a universalism of pseudo or petit-valuations, and punishes those resistant and inflexible to them in the name of toleration. This essay investigates what happens when this ‟axiomatic” register (i.e. a reduction to a set of values) gets displaced in order to conceptualize religion also in terms of the nonvaluable or ‟rejected.” Rejection entails the paradox that what is rejected often speaks to a deeper reality of what in fact is desired. Thus, what we reject usually says infinitely more about us than what we claim to value and affirm. This essay interprets Derrida’s essay ‟How to Avoid Speaking: Denials” alongside his ‟Faith and Knowledge” in order to offer a Derridean conception of religion on the terms of a rejection that amounts to a double-affirmation or de-negation.

Keywords: Phenomenology; Denial; Derrida; Religion; Theory; Denegation; Faith; Knowledge; Globalization

References

  • Alvis, Jason W. Marion and Derrida on the Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things. Springer Press, 2016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coward, Harold G., Toby Foshay, and Jacques Derrida. Derrida and Negative Theology. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “A Certain Impossible Possibility of Saying the Event” in The Late Derrida. Ed. Mitchell, W. J. T., and Arnold I. Davidson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. Comment ne pas parler. Dénégations, en Psyché. Inventions de l’autre. Paris: Éditions Galilée, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “Faith and Knowledge: The Two Sources of ‘Religion’ Within the Limits of Reason Alone” in Religion. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “A Conversation with Jacques Derrida” in Deconstruction in a Nutshell, ed. John D. Caputo. New York: Fordham University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “From Restricted to General Economy” in Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “Force of Law: the Mystical Foundation of Authority” in Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, ed. Drucilla Cornell. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “How to Avoid Speaking: Denials” in Derrida and Negative Theology, eds. Harold G Coward and Toby Foshay Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “How to Avoid Speaking: Denials” in Psyche: Inventions of the Other Volume II. eds. Peggy Kamuf and Elizabeth Rottenberg. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques. “Khora” in On the Name, ed. Thomas Dutoit. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques and Jean-Luc Marion. God, the Gift, and Postmodernism, eds. John D Caputo, and Michael J. Scanlon. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Freud, Sigmund. “Negation” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, vol 19, ed. James Strachey et al. London: The Hogart Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1953-74.Google Scholar

  • Geertz, Clifford. “Religion as a Cultural System” in The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books Press, 1973.Google Scholar

  • Goh, Irving. The Reject: Community, Politics, and Religion after the Subject. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Hart, Kevin, and Yvonne Sherwood (eds.). Derrida and Religion: Other Testaments. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness, trans. Jeffrey Kosky. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Müller, Friedrich Max. Natural Religion, Gifford Lectures vol. 1. 1888-1892. London and New York: Longmans Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

  • Nass, Michael. Derrida From Now On. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Norris, Christopher. Derrida. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Raschke, Carl. “Derrida and the Return of Religion: Religious Theory after Postmodernism.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 6:2 (2005): 1-16.Google Scholar

  • Sloterdijk, Peter. God’s Zeal: The Battle of the Three monotheisms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Tillich, Paul. Theology of Culture. Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

  • Tweed, Thomas. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-06-06

Accepted: 2017-09-14

Published Online: 2017-10-28

Published in Print: 2017-10-26


Citation Information: Open Theology, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0045.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in