Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Myth of Religious Experience Revisited

A Reply to “The Demystification of Nick Zangwill’s ‘Myth of Religious Experience’” by Manuel Fasko

Nick Zangwill
Published Online: 2017-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0046

Abstract

This article replies to Manuel Fasko’s “The Demystification of Nick Zangwill’s ‘Myth of Religious Experience’” (2017), showing how author’s argument against the possibility of religious experience presented in “The Myth of Religious Experience” (2004) remains in tact.

Keywords: religious experience; God; religion; perception; infinity

References

  • Descartes, Rene. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, edited and translated from the original Latin and French by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch. 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. [Vol. II contains the Meditations.]Google Scholar

  • Fasko, Manuel. “The Demystification of Nick Zangwill’s ‘Myth of Religious Experience’”, Open Theology 3 (2017): 370-379.Google Scholar

  • Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, Bertrand. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, London: Routledge, 1948.Google Scholar

  • Zangwill, Nick. “The Myth of Religious Experience”, Religious Studies 40 (2004): 1-22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-09-19

Accepted: 2017-10-06

Published Online: 2017-10-28

Published in Print: 2017-10-26


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 600–602, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0046.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in